Suppr超能文献

玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗、贝伐单抗或阿柏西普治疗新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性患者后的全身药代动力学。

Systemic pharmacokinetics following intravitreal injections of ranibizumab, bevacizumab or aflibercept in patients with neovascular AMD.

作者信息

Avery Robert L, Castellarin Alessandro A, Steinle Nathan C, Dhoot Dilsher S, Pieramici Dante Joseph, See Robert, Couvillion Stephen, Nasir Ma'an A, Rabena Melvin D, Le Kha, Maia Mauricio, Visich Jennifer E

机构信息

California Retina Consultants, Santa Barbara, California, USA.

Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.

出版信息

Br J Ophthalmol. 2014 Dec;98(12):1636-41. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305252. Epub 2014 Jul 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Data comparing systemic exposure and systemic vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) suppression of ranibizumab, bevacizumab and aflibercept following intravitreal injection are lacking.

METHODS

Fifty-six patients with wet age-related macular degeneration received intravitreal ranibizumab (0.5 mg), bevacizumab (1.25 mg), or aflibercept (2.0 mg). Serum pharmacokinetics and plasma free VEGF were evaluated after the first and third injections.

RESULTS

Following the first dose, systemic exposure to aflibercept was 5-, 37-, and 9-fold higher than ranibizumab, whereas, bevacizumab was 9-, 310-, and 35-fold higher than ranibizumab, based on geometric mean ratio of peak and trough concentrations and area under the curve, respectively. The third dose showed accumulation of bevacizumab and aflibercept but not ranibizumab. Aflibercept substantially suppressed plasma free VEGF, with mean levels below lower limit of quantitation (10 pg/mL) as early as 3 h postdose until ≥7 days postdose. Mean free (unbound) VEGF levels with ranibizumab were largely unchanged, with mean trough level of 14.4 pg/mL compared with baseline of 17 pg/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

There are notable differences in systemic pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics among anti-VEGF treatments after intravitreal administration. All three agents rapidly moved into the bloodstream, but ranibizumab very quickly cleared, whereas bevacizumab and aflibercept demonstrated greater systemic exposure and produced a marked reduction in plasma free VEGF.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02118831.

摘要

背景

缺乏关于玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗、贝伐单抗和阿柏西普后全身暴露情况及对全身血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)抑制作用的比较数据。

方法

56例湿性年龄相关性黄斑变性患者接受玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗(0.5mg)、贝伐单抗(1.25mg)或阿柏西普(2.0mg)。在首次和第三次注射后评估血清药代动力学和血浆游离VEGF。

结果

首次给药后,基于峰浓度、谷浓度和曲线下面积的几何平均比值,阿柏西普的全身暴露量分别比雷珠单抗高5倍、37倍和9倍,而贝伐单抗分别比雷珠单抗高9倍、310倍和35倍。第三次给药显示贝伐单抗和阿柏西普有蓄积,但雷珠单抗没有。阿柏西普能显著抑制血浆游离VEGF,早在给药后3小时直至给药后≥7天,平均水平低于定量下限(10pg/mL)。雷珠单抗的平均游离(未结合)VEGF水平基本未变,平均谷浓度为14.4pg/mL,而基线水平为17pg/mL。

结论

玻璃体内给药后,抗VEGF治疗之间在全身药代动力学和药效学方面存在显著差异。所有三种药物都迅速进入血液循环,但雷珠单抗很快清除,而贝伐单抗和阿柏西普表现出更高的全身暴露量,并使血浆游离VEGF显著降低。

试验注册号

NCT02118831。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b52/4251300/9d559322c77f/bjophthalmol-2014-305252f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验