Suppr超能文献

对医学生医院访视的简短结构化观察。

Brief structured observation of medical student hospital visits.

作者信息

Pierce J Rush, Noronha Leonard, Collins N Perryman, Fancovic Edward

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.

出版信息

Educ Health (Abingdon). 2013 Sep-Dec;26(3):188-91. doi: 10.4103/1357-6283.126003.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Students' clinical, communication, and professionalism skills are best assessed when faculty directly observe clinical encounters with patients. Prior to 2009, third-year medical students at our institution had one observed clinical encounter by clinic-based faculty during a required internal medicine clerkship. These observations averaged 45 minutes, feedback was not standardized, and student and faculty satisfaction was low.

METHODS

Two hospital-based faculty members redesigned a shorter, standardized exercise during which a faculty member observed the student making rounds on a hospitalized patient that they were actively following. On a checklist, faculty recorded observations about communication (8 items), physical examination (5 items), and professionalism (4 items). Faculty provided immediate feedback.

RESULTS

Faculty's direct observation of medical students prerounding on hospitalized internal medicine patients averaged 27 minutes including the feedback to students. In one year, 67/71 (94%) students completed the exercise; records were available for 66 (99%) of these encounters. Time of observation averaged 13.5 minutes (range 3-26 minutes). Feedback averaged 13.4 minutes (range 8-25 minutes). Faculty provided feedback in the following areas (proportion of students): Communication (66/66, 100%); examination skills (63/66, 95%); and professionalism (65/66, 98%). Forty-three students (64%) completed an anonymous satisfaction survey. Thirty-nine of these (91%) found the exercise useful or very useful (average 5-point Likert score = 4.30) and 38 (88%) found it easy or very easy to schedule (average 5-point Likert score = 4.30).

DISCUSSION

Students found this exercise useful and easy to schedule. Faculty consistently provided feedback to students in areas of communication, physical examination, and professionalism.

摘要

引言

当教师直接观察学生与患者的临床接触时,对学生临床、沟通和专业技能的评估最为有效。2009年之前,我校三年级医学生在必修的内科实习期间,由临床教师进行一次观察性临床接触。这些观察平均时长为45分钟,反馈不规范,学生和教师满意度较低。

方法

两名医院教师重新设计了一个更简短、标准化的练习,在此过程中,一名教师观察学生对一名他们正在负责的住院患者进行查房。教师在一份清单上记录关于沟通(8项)、体格检查(5项)和专业素养(4项)的观察结果。教师会立即提供反馈。

结果

教师对内科住院患者查房前的医学生进行直接观察,包括对学生的反馈,平均时长为27分钟。在一年时间里,71名学生中有67名(94%)完成了该练习;其中66次(99%)有记录。观察时间平均为13.5分钟(范围3 - 26分钟)。反馈平均时长为13.4分钟(范围8 - 25分钟)。教师在以下方面提供了反馈(学生比例):沟通(66/66,100%);检查技能(63/66,95%);专业素养(65/66,98%)。43名学生(64%)完成了一项匿名满意度调查。其中39名(91%)认为该练习有用或非常有用(平均5分制李克特量表得分 = 4.30),38名(88%)认为安排该练习很容易或非常容易(平均5分制李克特量表得分 = 4.30)。

讨论

学生们认为该练习有用且易于安排。教师始终在沟通、体格检查和专业素养方面为学生提供反馈。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验