A national questionnaire survey of consultants and middle grade doctors' perception of foundation doctors in obstetrics and gynaecology in the United Kingdom.

AIM

The aim of this study was to compare foundation doctors in obstetrics and gynaecology to the former grade of senior house officer, as perceived by their consultant and middle grade colleagues.

METHODS

A self-construct questionnaire was sent to College District Tutors in obstetrics and gynaecology in all hospitals in the United Kingdom, for circulation to all consultants and middle grade doctors in obstetrics and gynaecology in their departments.

RESULTS

A total of 155 questionnaires were returned, 143 completed and 12 indicating not having foundation doctors. Whilst about 50 % of respondents ranked the competencies of foundation year doctors as similar to that of the former senior house officer grade, the ratings were down in areas specific to obstetrics and gynaecology, such as seeing new patients in antenatal clinic, and up in general terms such as communication. General comments highlighted differences in ability and role and suggested longer attachments and less frequent changes in training structure.

CONCLUSIONS

The study highlighted the need to focus on teaching generic skills in shorter durations and reflection on whole-patient management, which are relevant to all specialities. It underlined the impact of more frequent change of doctors on service delivery and recommended having a further look at foundation training programme before making any future changes.