Suppr超能文献

妇产科应该成为独立的专科吗?一项对约克郡实习医生的调查。

Should obstetrics and gynaecology be separate specialities? A survey of Yorkshire trainees.

作者信息

Pandey U, Lindow S W

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull, UK.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006 May;26(4):305-6. doi: 10.1080/01443610600594807.

Abstract

A questionnaire was given to trainees attending the Yorkshire Modular training programme to determine their views on separating obstetrics and gynaecology. A total of 73 questionnaires were collected; 34% of participants were junior grade (SHO), 65% were middle grade (SpR, LAT, SSHO) and 30% of participants were male. A total of 42% of participants wanted to work in gynaecology only; 28% of participants wanted to work in obstetrics only; and only 23% wanted a combined practice. The primary reasons to prefer gynaecology was more job satisfaction than in obstetrics and better social hours of work (100%). All of the 28% of participants who wanted to work in obstetrics only, thought it is more rewarding and 100% enjoyed the challenge. In conclusion, perhaps separating obstetrics and gynaecology will make both specialties more attractive, as individuals would not be compelled to practice both. There is a possibility that this might result in better recruitment and retention in both specialities.

摘要

一份问卷被发放给参加约克郡模块化培训项目的学员,以确定他们对产科和妇科分科的看法。总共收集到73份问卷;34%的参与者为初级职称(住院医师),65%为中级职称(专科住院医师、高级住院医师培训生、资深住院医师),30%的参与者为男性。共有42%的参与者只想从事妇科工作;28%的参与者只想从事产科工作;只有23%的人希望综合执业。选择妇科的主要原因是工作满意度高于产科,且工作社交时间更好(100%)。所有只想从事产科工作的28%的参与者都认为这更有意义,100%的人喜欢其中的挑战。总之,或许将产科和妇科分科会使这两个专科更具吸引力,因为个人不会被迫同时从事这两个领域的工作。这有可能导致两个专科在招聘和留用方面都有更好的效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验