University of Maryland , College Park, Maryland 20742, United States.
Anal Chem. 2014 Jul 15;86(14):6836-42. doi: 10.1021/ac403503q. Epub 2014 Jul 7.
We propose bionanoparticles as a candidate reference material for determining the mobility of nanoparticles over the range of 6 × 10(-8)-5 × 10(-6) m(2)V(-1)s(-1). Using an electrospray differential mobility analyzer (ES-DMA), we measured the empirical distribution of several bionanoparticles. All of them show monomodal distributions that are more than two times narrower than the currently used calibration particles for mobility larger than 6 × 10(-8) m(2)V(-1)s(-1) (diameters less than 60 nm). We also present a numerical method to calculate corrected distributions of bionanoparticles by separating the contribution of the diffusive transfer function. The corrected distribution is about 20% narrower than the empirical distributions. Even with the correction, the reduced width of the mobility distribution is about a factor of 2 larger than the diffusive transfer function. The additional broadening could result from the nonuniform conformation of bionanoparticles and from the presence of volatile impurities or solvent adducts. The mobilities of these investigated bionanoparticle are stable over a range of buffer concentration and molarity, with no evidence of temporal degradation over several weeks.
我们提出生物纳米粒子作为确定纳米粒子迁移率的候选参考物质,范围为 6×10(-8)-5×10(-6) m(2)V(-1)s(-1)。使用电喷雾差分迁移率分析仪 (ES-DMA),我们测量了几种生物纳米粒子的经验分布。它们都显示出单模态分布,比目前用于迁移率大于 6×10(-8) m(2)V(-1)s(-1)的校准粒子(直径小于 60nm)的分布要窄两倍以上。我们还提出了一种数值方法,通过分离扩散传递函数的贡献来计算生物纳米粒子的修正分布。修正后的分布比经验分布窄约 20%。即使进行了修正,迁移率分布的变窄程度仍比扩散传递函数大约 2 倍。这种额外的展宽可能是由于生物纳米粒子的非均匀构象以及挥发性杂质或溶剂加合物的存在造成的。这些研究中的生物纳米粒子的迁移率在缓冲浓度和摩尔浓度范围内是稳定的,在数周的时间内没有证据表明其随时间降解。