Suppr超能文献

抗高血压和降脂治疗预防心脏病发作试验(ALLHAT)期间外周动脉疾病参与者的特征及长期随访

Characteristics and long-term follow-up of participants with peripheral arterial disease during ALLHAT.

作者信息

Piller Linda B, Simpson Lara M, Baraniuk Sarah, Habib Gabriel B, Rahman Mahboob, Basile Jan N, Dart Richard A, Ellsworth Allan J, Fendley Herbert, Probstfield Jeffrey L, Whelton Paul K, Davis Barry R

机构信息

The University of Texas School of Public Health, 1200 Herman Pressler St., W-906, Houston, TX, 77030, USA,

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Nov;29(11):1475-83. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2947-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hypertension is a major risk factor for peripheral artery disease (PAD). Little is known about relative efficacy of antihypertensive treatments for preventing PAD.

OBJECTIVES

To compare, by randomized treatment groups, hospitalized or revascularized PAD rates and subsequent morbidity and mortality among participants in the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lower Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT).

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blind, active-control trial in high-risk hypertensive participants.

PARTICIPANTS

Eight hundred thirty participants with specified secondary outcome of lower extremity PAD events during the randomized phase of ALLHAT.

INTERVENTIONS/EVENTS: In-trial PAD events were reported during ALLHAT (1994-2002). Post-trial mortality data through 2006 were obtained from administrative databases. Mean follow-up was 8.8 years.

MAIN MEASURES

Baseline characteristics and intermediate outcomes in three treatment groups, using the Kaplan-Meier method to calculate cumulative event rates and post-PAD mortality rates, Cox proportional hazards regression model for hazard ratios and 95 % confidence intervals, and multivariate Cox regression models to examine risk differences among treatment groups.

KEY RESULTS

Following adjustment for baseline characteristics, neither participants assigned to the calcium-channel antagonist amlodipine nor to the ACE-inhibitor lisinopril showed a difference in risk of clinically advanced PAD compared with those in the chlorthalidone arm (HR, 0.86; 95 % CI, 0.72-1.03 and HR, 0.98; 95 % CI, 0.83-1.17, respectively). Of the 830 participants with in-trial PAD events, 63 % died compared to 34 % of those without PAD; there were no significant treatment group differences for subsequent nonfatal myocardial infarction, coronary revascularizations, strokes, heart failure, or mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Neither amlodipine nor lisinopril showed superiority over chlorthalidone in reducing clinically advanced PAD risk. These findings reinforce the compelling need for comparative outcome trials examining treatment of PAD in high-risk hypertensive patients. Once PAD develops, cardiovascular event and mortality risk is high, regardless of type of antihypertensive treatment.

摘要

背景

高血压是外周动脉疾病(PAD)的主要危险因素。关于降压治疗预防PAD的相对疗效知之甚少。

目的

通过随机治疗组比较降压和降脂治疗预防心脏病发作试验(ALLHAT)参与者中住院或接受血运重建的PAD发生率以及随后的发病率和死亡率。

设计

对高危高血压参与者进行的随机、双盲、活性对照试验。

参与者

ALLHAT随机阶段有指定下肢PAD事件次要结局的830名参与者。

干预措施/事件:ALLHAT期间报告了试验期间的PAD事件(1994 - 2002年)。通过行政数据库获得了截至2006年的试验后死亡率数据。平均随访时间为8.8年。

主要测量指标

三个治疗组的基线特征和中间结局,使用Kaplan-Meier方法计算累积事件率和PAD后死亡率,使用Cox比例风险回归模型计算风险比和95%置信区间,并使用多变量Cox回归模型检查治疗组之间的风险差异。

关键结果

在对基线特征进行调整后,与氯噻酮组相比,分配到钙通道拮抗剂氨氯地平组或ACE抑制剂赖诺普利组的参与者在临床进展性PAD风险方面均无差异(风险比分别为0.86;95%置信区间为0.72 - 1.03和风险比为0.98;95%置信区间为0.83 - 1.17)。在830名试验期间发生PAD事件的参与者中,63%死亡,而未发生PAD的参与者中这一比例为34%;在随后的非致命性心肌梗死、冠状动脉血运重建、中风、心力衰竭或死亡率方面,各治疗组之间无显著差异。

结论

在降低临床进展性PAD风险方面,氨氯地平和赖诺普利均未显示出优于氯噻酮的效果。这些发现强化了对高危高血压患者PAD治疗进行比较结局试验的迫切需求。一旦发生PAD,无论降压治疗类型如何,心血管事件和死亡风险都很高。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

10
Global Vascular Guidelines on the Management of Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.全球血管指南:慢性肢体威胁性缺血的管理。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019 Jul;58(1S):S1-S109.e33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.05.006. Epub 2019 Jun 8.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验