Charbonnier B, Meyer G, Stern M, Sors H, Brochier M L
Cardiology Department, University Hospital Tours, France.
Herz. 1989 Jun;14(3):157-71.
Many investigators have reported about beneficial results with thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Streptokinase and urokinase have been used for more than 15 years, but the conditions of use of these agents still remain controversial. Optimal dosage and treatment schedule are still evolving. For streptokinase most investigators adopt a fixed dosage schedule: a loading dose of 250,000 units followed by a maintenance infusion of 100,000 units per hour for 24 to 72 hours. For urokinase numerous dosage regimens have been used such as: high dosage schedule 4,400 units per kilogram per hour for twelve to 24 hours with or without loading dose; moderate dosage 1,600 to 2,000 units per kilogram per hour for 24 hours and low dosage in bolus. With these treatments there is a trend to reduced in-hospital-mortality in massive pulmonary embolism; the early pulmonary revascularization and the hemodynamic improvement are higher than those noticed with heparin. These results are obtained with a minimum of complication essentially bleeding in 10 or 15%; most bleeding being located at puncture site. More recently, new thrombolytic agents have been used in acute pulmonary embolism. Only four studies have tested rt-PA which is effective and relatively safe, but the optimal dose regimens remain to be determined. Less information is available concerning Anisoylated Plasminogen Streptokinase Activator Complex (APSAC), the angiographic improvement seems to be rapid and important (50% on average) but the decrease of fibrinogen is important too and comparable with streptokinase. Considering the good results of thrombolytic treatment of acute submassive and massive pulmonary embolism, there is a doubt as to whether the pulmonary embolectomy has any place in the pulmonary embolism patients except in those with cardiac arrest. In the near future new thrombolytic drugs could be more efficient on pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis, and thus the bleeding risk might be decreased.
许多研究者报告了溶栓治疗急性肺栓塞患者的有益结果。链激酶和尿激酶已使用超过15年,但这些药物的使用条件仍存在争议。最佳剂量和治疗方案仍在不断发展。对于链激酶,大多数研究者采用固定剂量方案:负荷剂量250,000单位,随后以每小时100,000单位的维持输注持续24至72小时。对于尿激酶,已使用多种剂量方案,如:高剂量方案,每千克每小时4,400单位,持续12至24小时,有或无负荷剂量;中等剂量,每千克每小时1,600至2,000单位,持续24小时,以及低剂量推注。通过这些治疗,大面积肺栓塞患者的院内死亡率有降低趋势;早期肺血管再通和血流动力学改善高于肝素治疗组。这些结果在最少并发症的情况下获得,主要并发症为出血,发生率为10%或15%;大多数出血位于穿刺部位。最近,新型溶栓药物已用于急性肺栓塞。仅有四项研究测试了rt-PA,其有效且相对安全,但最佳剂量方案仍有待确定。关于茴香酰化纤溶酶原链激酶激活剂复合物(APSAC)的信息较少,血管造影改善似乎迅速且显著(平均50%),但纤维蛋白原降低也很显著,与链激酶相当。考虑到急性次大面积和大面积肺栓塞溶栓治疗的良好结果,除心脏骤停患者外,肺栓塞患者是否需要行肺栓子切除术存在疑问。在不久的将来,新型溶栓药物可能对肺栓塞和深静脉血栓形成更有效,从而降低出血风险。