• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对植入上颌窦增量区的烧结多孔表面牙科种植体的回顾性研究。

Retrospective study of sintered porous-surfaced dental implants placed in the augmented sinus.

作者信息

Sohn Dong-Seok, Lee Jae-Mok, Park In-Sook, Jung Heui-Seung, Park Do-Young, Shin Im-Hee

出版信息

Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2014 Jul-Aug;34(4):565-71. doi: 10.11607/prd.1086.

DOI:10.11607/prd.1086
PMID:25006774
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze clinical and radiographic outcomes of sintered porous-surfaced dental implants placed in partially edentulous posterior maxillae. The study group consisted of 42 partially edentulous patients who received sinus augmentation using the lateral window technique or crestal approach at Catholic University Hospital of Daegu and one private clinic. The 42 patients received a total of 92 sintered porous-surfaced dental implants in the edentulous posterior maxillae. All implants were restored with fixed prostheses. Of the 92 implants, 17 implants were restored with individual (nonsplinted) crowns, while 75 implants were splinted to other implants. Panoramic views and periapical radiographs using the standardized long-cone paralleling technique were taken at the first visit, postoperatively, at the time of prosthesis seating, and at a follow-up visit. Survival rates of implants in relation to location, length, diameter, crown-to-implant (C/I) ratio, and type of prosthesis were investigated. Statistical data were analyzed using software with the chi-square test. Of the 92 implants, 8 (8.7%) were removed, and the cumulative survival rate was 91.3% after a maximum 9-year functional period (mean: 72.8 months; range: 11 to 107 months). There were no statistical differences in relation to the location of implants, C/I ratio, or type of prosthesis. However, there were statistical differences in relation to the length and diameter of implants. Average crestal bone loss was 0.68 mm at 1-year follow-up and 1.13 mm at final examination. All implants were inserted in the augmented maxillary sites. The cumulative survival rate of sintered porous-surfaced implants in posterior maxillae was 91.3%. Sintered porous-surfaced implants showed satisfactory results in the edentulous posterior maxillae.

摘要

本研究的目的是分析置于部分缺牙的上颌后牙区的烧结多孔表面牙种植体的临床和影像学结果。研究组由42例部分缺牙患者组成,这些患者在大邱天主教大学医院和一家私人诊所接受了使用侧窗技术或嵴顶入路的上颌窦提升术。这42例患者在上颌后牙区共植入了92颗烧结多孔表面牙种植体。所有种植体均采用固定修复体修复。在92颗种植体中,17颗种植体采用单冠(非联冠)修复,而75颗种植体与其他种植体联冠。在首次就诊、术后、修复体就位时以及随访时,使用标准化长锥平行技术拍摄全景片和根尖片。研究了种植体的存留率与位置、长度、直径、冠根比(C/I)以及修复体类型的关系。使用软件进行卡方检验分析统计数据。在92颗种植体中,有8颗(8.7%)被取出,在最长9年的功能期(平均:72.8个月;范围:11至107个月)后,累积存留率为91.3%。种植体的位置、C/I比或修复体类型之间无统计学差异。然而,种植体的长度和直径之间存在统计学差异。1年随访时平均嵴顶骨吸收为0.68 mm,最终检查时为1.13 mm。所有种植体均植入上颌窦提升后的部位。上颌后牙区烧结多孔表面种植体的累积存留率为91.3%。烧结多孔表面种植体在上颌后牙区缺牙区显示出令人满意的结果。

相似文献

1
Retrospective study of sintered porous-surfaced dental implants placed in the augmented sinus.对植入上颌窦增量区的烧结多孔表面牙科种植体的回顾性研究。
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2014 Jul-Aug;34(4):565-71. doi: 10.11607/prd.1086.
2
A retrospective study of sintered porous-surfaced dental implants in restoring the edentulous posterior mandible: up to 9 years of functioning.一项关于烧结多孔表面牙种植体修复下颌无牙后牙的回顾性研究:长达 9 年的功能。
Implant Dent. 2010 Oct;19(5):409-18. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3181ed2cee.
3
An assessment of crown-to-root ratios with short sintered porous-surfaced implants supporting prostheses in partially edentulous patients.对部分牙列缺损患者中支持修复体的短烧结多孔表面种植体的冠根比进行评估。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005 Jan-Feb;20(1):69-76.
4
Performance of threaded versus sintered porous-surfaced dental implants using open window or indirect osteotome-mediated sinus elevation: a retrospective report.使用开窗法或间接骨凿介导的上颌窦提升术植入螺纹状与烧结多孔表面牙科种植体的效果:一项回顾性报告。
J Periodontol. 2008 Apr;79(4):728-36. doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.070263.
5
Performance of sintered, porous-surfaced, press-fit implants after 10 years of function in the partially edentulous posterior mandible.烧结多孔表面压配式种植体在下颌后牙部分缺牙区行使功能10年后的性能表现
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2012 Oct;32(5):563-70.
6
Ultrashort sintered porous-surfaced dental implants used to replace posterior teeth.用于替换后牙的超短烧结多孔表面牙科植入物。
J Periodontol. 2008 Jul;79(7):1280-6. doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.070496.
7
Porous-surfaced dental implants in the partially edentulous maxilla: assessment for subclinical mobility.部分牙列缺失上颌骨中多孔表面牙科种植体:亚临床松动度评估
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2002 Apr;22(2):184-92.
8
Osteotome sinus floor elevation and simultaneous placement of implants--a 1-year retrospective study with Astra Tech implants.骨凿上颌窦底提升术与种植体同期植入——一项使用Astra Tech种植体的1年回顾性研究
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2008 Mar;10(1):62-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2007.00062.x.
9
Influence of crown-implant ratio on implant success rates and crestal bone levels: a 36-month follow-up prospective study.冠-植比对种植体成功率和牙槽嵴骨水平的影响:一项为期 36 个月的前瞻性研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Feb;25(2):240-51. doi: 10.1111/clr.12105. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
10
Single versus splinted short implants at sinus augmented sites: A systematic review and meta-analysis.单颗短种植体与窦底提升位点中使用支抗的短种植体的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Jun;122(3):303-310. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2020.08.013. Epub 2020 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparison of marginal bone loss, survival rate, and prosthetic complications in implant-supported splinted and nonsplinted restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.种植体支持的夹板式和非夹板式修复体的边缘骨丧失、存活率和修复体并发症的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2022 Apr-Jun;22(2):111-121. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_365_21.
2
Short Implants versus Longer Implants with Sinus Floor Elevation: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials with a Post-Loading Follow-Up Duration of 5 Years.短种植体与行上颌窦底提升的长种植体对比:一项对加载后随访期为5年的随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Materials (Basel). 2022 Jul 5;15(13):4722. doi: 10.3390/ma15134722.