Skolnick Gary B, Naidoo Sybill D, Patel Kamlesh B, Woo Albert S
From the Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Institute, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
J Craniofac Surg. 2014 Jul;25(4):1178-82. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000000809.
Deformational plagiocephaly (DP) is an asymmetry of the skull caused by extrinsic compression. With the advent of the Back to Sleep campaign, DP is of increased interest to parents and healthcare providers. Traditionally, this asymmetry has been assessed by caliper measurements. However, little consensus exists as to which caliper measures (linear) give the most accurate representation of DP. The purposes of this study are to examine different measures and to determine which have the greatest validity in the assessment of skull asymmetry.
Six linear measures were assessed using 31 three-dimensional photographs of 26 children diagnosed with DP. These measurements were compared with more encompassing measures: a head perimeter measurement, a global three-dimensional measure of hemispheric asymmetry, and the radial symmetry index. These 3 broader measures were used to determine which linear, caliper-style measurements most accurately reflect overall DP.
Intrarater reliability of the measurements varied widely (intraclass correlation coefficients from 0.42 to 0.99). Correlations between the measures also varied widely (0.10 < r < 0.95). The linear measure that best correlated with the inclusive measures of asymmetry was FZ-EU, the distance from the frontozygomaticus to the contralateral eurion (r ≥ 0.90).
These data introduce 2 digital measures that might serve as standards against which linear measures of asymmetry may be tested: Global asymmetry and head perimeter measures were strongly correlated to each other. When these 2 parameters were compared against linear measures, FZ-EU was noted to be the best linear measure of asymmetry based on these benchmarks.
变形性斜头畸形(DP)是由外部压迫导致的颅骨不对称。随着“仰卧睡眠”运动的出现,DP受到了家长和医疗服务提供者越来越多的关注。传统上,这种不对称是通过卡尺测量来评估的。然而,对于哪种卡尺测量(线性)能最准确地反映DP,几乎没有达成共识。本研究的目的是检查不同的测量方法,并确定哪些在评估颅骨不对称方面具有最大的有效性。
使用26名被诊断为DP的儿童的31张三维照片评估了六种线性测量方法。将这些测量结果与更全面的测量方法进行比较:头围测量、半球不对称的整体三维测量以及径向对称指数。使用这三种更广泛的测量方法来确定哪些线性卡尺式测量最准确地反映整体DP。
测量的评分者内信度差异很大(组内相关系数从0.42到0.99)。测量之间的相关性也差异很大(0.10 < r < 0.95)。与不对称的包容性测量最相关的线性测量是FZ-EU,即从颧额缝到对侧耳点的距离(r≥0.90)。
这些数据引入了两种数字测量方法,可作为测试不对称线性测量的标准:整体不对称和头围测量彼此高度相关。当将这两个参数与线性测量进行比较时,基于这些基准,FZ-EU被认为是不对称的最佳线性测量方法。