Skolnick Gary B, Naidoo Sybill D, Nguyen Dennis C, Patel Kamlesh B, Woo Albert S
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Institute, Washington University in Saint Louis School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO.
J Craniofac Surg. 2016 Sep;27(6):1498-500. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002874.
The severity of deformational plagiocephaly is frequently measured by cranial vault asymmetry (CVA). Cranial vault asymmetry is a simple linear proxy for the three-dimensional deformity. Different anthropometric landmarks have been suggested as the endpoints of the cross-cranial diagonals that determine CVA. One promising albeit counterintuitive set of digital landmarks is the frontozygomaticus and contralateral eurion. The validity of nondigital caliper measures associated with the diagonals defined by the frontozygomaticus and contralateral eurions has not been tested. In this study, the authors compare caliper measures against stereophotogrammetric measures that have been documented to correlate strongly with overall skull asymmetry.Cranial vault asymmetry was assessed by direct anthropometry with 2 different measures on 36 patients. Frontozygomaticus and contralateral eurion (fz-eu) and 30 degrees off the anteroposterior diameter (30offAP). Three-dimensional photographs were obtained and also used to quantify CVA in these subjects; digital measures of fz-eu and an overall measure of plagiocephaly (Global) were calculated. Global and 30offAP obtained at 31 patient visits in 2011 were also included.The measure best-correlated with overall Global asymmetry was digital fz-eu (R = 0.80). Caliper fz-eu was not strongly correlated with Global asymmetry (R = 0.27) or with digital fz-eu (R = 0.34). Differences between the digital and caliper fz-eu measures were 5 ± 4 mm (mean ± st. dev.). Differences between the caliper fz-eu and 30offAP measures were 6 ± 4 mm.Digital fz-eu shows an excellent correlation to Global asymmetry. However, attempts to replicate this result in the clinical setting by measuring fz-eu with calipers were unsuccessful.
变形性斜头畸形的严重程度通常通过颅穹不对称(CVA)来衡量。颅穹不对称是三维畸形的一种简单线性指标。不同的人体测量标志点被建议作为确定CVA的颅交叉对角线的端点。一组虽有前景但违反直觉的数字标志点是额颧点和对侧耳点。与由额颧点和对侧耳点定义的对角线相关的非数字卡尺测量的有效性尚未得到检验。在本研究中,作者将卡尺测量结果与已被证明与整体颅骨不对称密切相关的立体摄影测量结果进行了比较。通过直接人体测量,对36例患者采用两种不同测量方法评估颅穹不对称。额颧点和对侧耳点(fz-eu)以及与前后径成30度角(30offAP)。获取三维照片并用于量化这些受试者的CVA;计算了fz-eu的数字测量值和斜头畸形的整体测量值(Global)。还纳入了2011年31次患者就诊时获得的Global和30offAP。与整体Global不对称相关性最佳的测量值是数字fz-eu(R = 0.80)。卡尺测量的fz-eu与Global不对称(R = 0.27)或数字fz-eu(R = 0.34)的相关性不强。数字和卡尺测量的fz-eu之间的差异为5±4毫米(平均值±标准差)。卡尺测量的fz-eu与30offAP测量值之间的差异为6±4毫米。数字fz-eu与Global不对称显示出极好的相关性。然而,在临床环境中通过卡尺测量fz-eu来复制这一结果的尝试未成功。