Suppr超能文献

基线心房颤动周期长度对持续性心房颤动消融术急性及长期结局的影响

Impact of baseline atrial fibrillation cycle length on acute and long-term outcome of persistent atrial fibrillation ablation.

作者信息

Ammar S, Hessling G, Paulik M, Reents T, Dillier R, Buiatti A, Semmler V, Kolb C, Haller B, Deisenhofer I

机构信息

Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Lazarettstrasse 36, 80636, Munich, Germany,

出版信息

J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014 Dec;41(3):253-9. doi: 10.1007/s10840-014-9927-6. Epub 2014 Jul 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A short baseline atrial fibrillation (AF) cycle length (CL) has been associated with a worse outcome after catheter ablation for AF, whereas the impact of a long baseline AFCL is unknown. We investigated the influence of AFCL on acute and long-term success in a large series of patients undergoing catheter ablation for persistent AF.

METHODS

Overall, 177 consecutive patients undergoing catheter ablation of persistent AF using a sequential ablation approach were included in the analysis. AFCL was measured in the left atrial appendage (LAA) at baseline and following each ablation step. The primary endpoint was freedom from any atrial arrhythmia off antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) with a single ablation procedure after 12 months.

RESULTS

Mean AFCL was 164 ± 24 ms. A shorter AFCL was associated with longer AF duration, larger LA diameter, and longer procedure duration. Termination to sinus rhythm (SR) was achieved in 57 (32 %) patients. Baseline AFCL was shorter (161 ± 24 ms) in patients without AF termination compared to patients with AF termination (169 ± 23 m, p = 0.03). The primary endpoint was reached less frequently in patients with a short (<155 ms) AFCL (18 vs. 38.5 %, p = 0.006). Patients with an AFCL between 155 and 200 ms had the best outcome compared to patients with AFCL <155 or ≥200 ms (40 vs. 18 %, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a baseline AFCL between 155 and 200 ms have the best outcome after a single ablation procedure for persistent AF compared to patients with an AFCL of <155 or ≥200 ms.

摘要

背景

房颤(AF)导管消融术后,短的基线房颤周期长度(CL)与较差的预后相关,而长基线房颤CL的影响尚不清楚。我们在大量接受持续性房颤导管消融的患者中研究了房颤CL对急性和长期消融成功的影响。

方法

总共177例采用序贯消融方法进行持续性房颤导管消融的连续患者纳入分析。在基线时以及每个消融步骤后,于左心耳(LAA)测量房颤CL。主要终点为在12个月时单次消融术后停用抗心律失常药物(AAD)且无任何房性心律失常。

结果

平均房颤CL为164±24毫秒。较短的房颤CL与较长的房颤持续时间、较大的左心房直径和较长的手术时间相关。57例(32%)患者恢复窦性心律(SR)。与恢复房颤的患者相比,未恢复房颤的患者基线房颤CL较短(161±24毫秒 vs. 169±23毫秒,p = 0.03)。房颤CL短(<155毫秒)的患者达到主要终点的频率较低(18% vs. 38.5%,p = 0.006)。房颤CL在155至200毫秒之间的患者与房颤CL<155或≥200毫秒的患者相比,预后最佳(40% vs. 18%,p = 0.003)。

结论

与房颤CL<155或≥200毫秒的患者相比,房颤CL在155至200毫秒之间的患者在单次消融治疗持续性房颤后预后最佳。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验