• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术中保留盆腔内筋膜:是否会影响尿失禁?

Endopelvic fascia preservation during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: does it affect urinary incontinence?

作者信息

Kwon Se Yun, Lee Jun Nyung, Kim Hyun Tae, Kim Tae-Hwan, Kim Bup Wan, Choi Gyu-Seog, Kwon Tae Gyun

机构信息

Departments of Urology.

出版信息

Scand J Urol. 2014 Dec;48(6):506-12. doi: 10.3109/21681805.2014.913259. Epub 2014 Jul 10.

DOI:10.3109/21681805.2014.913259
PMID:25008957
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Urinary incontinence has a significant impact on the quality of life after radical prostatectomy. This study aimed to determine whether preserving the endopelvic fascia influences subsequent urinary incontinence.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Consecutive patients (n = 138) who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) for prostate cancer between October 2010 and June 2012 with a minimum of 1 year follow-up were retrospectively analysed. The subjects were divided into two groups: the non-preserved endopelvic fascia group (nPE group) and the preserved endopelvic fascia group (PE group). Continence was defined as not using any pads and having no urine leakages. Continence rates at set time-points after RALP were compared using the chi-squared test. Continence recovery rates were analysed with the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. Prognostic factors of incontinence were identified using the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

The age, body mass index, preoperative prostate-specific antigen levels, prostate volume, estimated blood loss, mean operative time, Gleason score and pathological stage were not significantly different between the two study groups. The continence rate of the nPE group and PE group was 88.4% and 97.1%, respectively, at 12 months after surgery (p = 0.049), which was also significant according to the Kaplan-Meier analysis (p < 0.001). Preservation of endopelvic fascia was the only significant prognostic factor for urinary incontinence (p = 0.002, hazard ratio = 1.867) according to the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Endopelvic fascia preservation during RALP significantly enhances postoperative continence and is related to the speed of recovery of continence.

摘要

目的

尿失禁对根治性前列腺切除术后的生活质量有重大影响。本研究旨在确定保留盆腔内筋膜是否会影响随后的尿失禁情况。

材料与方法

回顾性分析2010年10月至2012年6月期间接受机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术(RALP)治疗前列腺癌且随访至少1年的连续患者(n = 138)。将研究对象分为两组:未保留盆腔内筋膜组(nPE组)和保留盆腔内筋膜组(PE组)。控尿定义为不使用任何尿垫且无尿液渗漏。采用卡方检验比较RALP术后设定时间点的控尿率。采用Kaplan-Meier法和对数秩检验分析控尿恢复率。使用Cox比例风险模型确定尿失禁的预后因素。

结果

两个研究组之间的年龄、体重指数、术前前列腺特异性抗原水平、前列腺体积、估计失血量、平均手术时间、Gleason评分和病理分期无显著差异。术后12个月时,nPE组和PE组的控尿率分别为88.4%和97.1%(p = 0.049),根据Kaplan-Meier分析也具有显著性差异(p < 0.001)。多因素分析显示,保留盆腔内筋膜是尿失禁唯一显著的预后因素(p = 0.002,风险比 = 1.867)。

结论

RALP术中保留盆腔内筋膜可显著提高术后控尿能力,并与控尿恢复速度有关。

相似文献

1
Endopelvic fascia preservation during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: does it affect urinary incontinence?机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术中保留盆腔内筋膜:是否会影响尿失禁?
Scand J Urol. 2014 Dec;48(6):506-12. doi: 10.3109/21681805.2014.913259. Epub 2014 Jul 10.
2
Degree of preservation of the neurovascular bundles during radical prostatectomy and urinary continence 1 year after surgery.根治性前列腺切除术后神经血管束的保留程度与术后 1 年的尿控情况。
Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):559-68. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.011. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
3
Preservation of Endopelvic Fascia: Effects on Postoperative Incontinence and Sexual Function - A Randomized Clinical Trial.盆腔筋膜保留:对术后尿失禁和性功能的影响——一项随机临床试验
J Sex Med. 2021 Feb;18(2):327-338. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.11.003. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
4
Continence outcomes after bladder neck preservation during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP).机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术中保留膀胱颈后的控尿结果。
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2015;24(6):364-71. doi: 10.3109/13645706.2015.1027711. Epub 2015 Mar 22.
5
A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Impact of the Retzius-sparing Approach on Early Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.一项实用随机对照试验研究了保留耻骨前列腺韧带在机器人辅助前列腺根治性切除术后早期尿控恢复中的影响。
Eur Urol. 2017 Nov;72(5):677-685. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.029. Epub 2017 May 6.
6
Effect of a risk-stratified grade of nerve-sparing technique on early return of continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.风险分层神经保留技术对机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后早期控尿功能恢复的影响。
Eur Urol. 2013 Mar;63(3):438-44. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.07.009. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
7
Retzius-sparing versus standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective randomized comparison on immediate continence rates.保留Retzius 膜与标准机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:即时控尿率的前瞻性随机比较。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Jul;33(7):2187-2196. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6499-z. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
8
Appropriate preoperative membranous urethral length predicts recovery of urinary continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.术前适当的膜尿道长度可预测机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术后尿控的恢复情况。
World J Surg Oncol. 2018 Nov 16;16(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1523-2.
9
Modified Apical Dissection and Lateral Prostatic Fascia Preservation Improves Early Postoperative Functional Recovery in Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Results from a Propensity Score-matched Analysis.改良尖部解剖和侧方前列腺筋膜保留术提高机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术后早期功能恢复:倾向评分匹配分析结果。
Eur Urol. 2020 Dec;78(6):875-884. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.05.041. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
10
Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A prospective single surgeon randomized comparative study.经腹腔与腹膜外机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术:一项前瞻性单术者随机对照研究。
Int J Urol. 2015 Oct;22(10):916-21. doi: 10.1111/iju.12854. Epub 2015 Jul 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of Urinary Continence Recovery after Laparoscopic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Is Surgical Urethral Length the Only Key Factor?腹腔镜辅助根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁恢复的预测因素:手术尿道长度是唯一关键因素吗?
Life (Basel). 2023 Jul 13;13(7):1550. doi: 10.3390/life13071550.
2
Are fascial strains involved in chronic pelvic pain syndrome? An exploratory matched case-control study.筋膜劳损是否与慢性盆腔疼痛综合征有关?一项探索性的病例对照匹配研究。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2023 Mar;55(3):511-518. doi: 10.1007/s11255-022-03448-2. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
3
Dorsal Vascular Complex Nonligation Method and Preservation of Puboprostatic Ligaments and Endopelvic Fascia During Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Effect on Continence.
腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术中背侧血管复合体不结扎法及耻骨前列腺韧带和盆腔内筋膜的保留:对控尿的影响
Turk J Urol. 2022 Sep;48(5):331-338. doi: 10.5152/tud.2022.22113.
4
Longer preserved urethral length in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy significantly contributes to post-operative urinary continence recovery.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中保留更长的尿道长度对术后尿失禁的恢复有显著作用。
BJUI Compass. 2021 Nov 12;3(2):184-190. doi: 10.1002/bco2.128. eCollection 2022 Mar.
5
How to Prevent and Manage Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence: A Review.如何预防和处理前列腺切除术后尿失禁:综述
World J Mens Health. 2021 Oct;39(4):581-597. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.200114. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
6
Dorsal Vein Complex Preserving Technique During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中保留背静脉复合体技术
J Endourol Case Rep. 2020 Sep 17;6(3):220-223. doi: 10.1089/cren.2020.0021. eCollection 2020.
7
Is Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy associated with better functional and oncological outcomes? Literature review and meta-analysis.保留Retzius间隙的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术是否与更好的功能和肿瘤学结果相关?文献综述与荟萃分析。
Asian J Urol. 2019 Apr;6(2):174-182. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2018.02.001. Epub 2018 Feb 9.