• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同意识水平颅脑损伤重症监护成人在伤害性刺激时的行为变化:一项观察性研究。

Behavioral changes in brain-injured critical care adults with different levels of consciousness during nociceptive stimulation: an observational study.

机构信息

Institute of Higher Education and Nursing Research, Lausanne University-CHUV, 1010 Lausanne, Switzerland,

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 2014 Aug;40(8):1115-23. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3380-y. Epub 2014 Jul 10.

DOI:10.1007/s00134-014-3380-y
PMID:25008977
Abstract

PURPOSE

The primary objective of this study was to describe the frequency of behaviors observed during rest, a non-nociceptive procedure, and a nociceptive procedure in brain-injured intensive care unit (ICU) patients with different levels of consciousness (LOC). Second, it examined the inter-rater reliability and discriminant and concurrent validity of the behavioral checklist used.

METHODS

The non-nociceptive procedure involved calling the patient and shaking his/her shoulder. The nociceptive procedure involved turning the patient. The frequency of behaviors was recorded using a behavioral checklist.

RESULTS

Patients with absence of movement, or stereotyped flexion or extension responses to a nociceptive stimulus displayed more behaviors during turning (median 5.5, range 0-14) than patients with localized responses (median 4, range 0-10) or able to self-report their pain (median 4, range 0-10). Face flushing, clenched teeth, clenched fist, and tremor were more frequent in patients with absence of movement, or stereotyped responses to a nociceptive stimulus. The reliability of the checklist was supported by a high intra-class correlation coefficient (0.77-0.92), and the internal consistency was acceptable in all three groups (KR 20, 0.71-0.85). Discriminant validity was supported as significantly more behaviors were observed during nociceptive stimulation than at rest. Concurrent validity was confirmed as checklist scores were correlated to the patients' self-reports of pain (r s = 0.53; 95 % CI 0.21-0.75).

CONCLUSION

Brain-injured patients reacted significantly more during a nociceptive stimulus and the number of observed behaviors was higher in patients with a stereotyped response.

摘要

目的

本研究的主要目的是描述不同意识水平(LOC)的脑损伤重症监护病房(ICU)患者在休息、非伤害性和伤害性过程中的行为频率。其次,检验了所使用行为检查表的组内信度、判别和同时效度。

方法

非伤害性过程包括呼唤患者并摇动其肩部。伤害性过程包括翻动患者。使用行为检查表记录行为频率。

结果

对伤害性刺激无运动或刻板屈肌/伸肌反应的患者在翻动时表现出更多的行为(中位数 5.5,范围 0-14),而有局部反应(中位数 4,范围 0-10)或能够自我报告疼痛的患者(中位数 4,范围 0-10)表现出较少的行为。面红、咬牙、握拳和震颤在对伤害性刺激无运动或刻板反应的患者中更为常见。检查表的可靠性得到了较高的组内相关系数(0.77-0.92)的支持,在所有三组中内部一致性均可接受(KR 20,0.71-0.85)。判别效度得到支持,因为在伤害性刺激期间观察到的行为明显多于休息时。同时效度得到证实,检查表评分与患者自我报告的疼痛相关(rs=0.53;95%CI 0.21-0.75)。

结论

脑损伤患者在伤害性刺激时反应明显更多,且刻板反应患者的观察行为数量更高。

相似文献

1
Behavioral changes in brain-injured critical care adults with different levels of consciousness during nociceptive stimulation: an observational study.不同意识水平颅脑损伤重症监护成人在伤害性刺激时的行为变化:一项观察性研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2014 Aug;40(8):1115-23. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3380-y. Epub 2014 Jul 10.
2
Detecting pain in traumatic brain-injured patients with different levels of consciousness during common procedures in the ICU: typical or atypical behaviors?在重症监护病房的常规操作过程中,检测不同意识水平的创伤性脑损伤患者的疼痛:典型行为还是非典型行为?
Clin J Pain. 2014 Nov;30(11):960-9. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000061.
3
Behaviors Indicative of Pain in Brain-Injured Adult Patients With Different Levels of Consciousness in the Intensive Care Unit.颅脑损伤重症监护患者不同意识水平的疼痛行为表现。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Apr;57(4):761-773. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.12.333. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
4
Validation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool-Neuro in brain-injured adults in the intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study.重症监护疼痛观察工具-神经在 ICU 脑损伤成人中的验证:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Crit Care. 2021 Apr 13;25(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03561-1.
5
Assessing pain in critically ill brain-injured patients: a psychometric comparison of 3 pain scales and videopupillometry.评估危重病脑损伤患者的疼痛:3 种疼痛量表和视频瞳孔计的心理测量学比较。
Pain. 2019 Nov;160(11):2535-2543. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001637.
6
Validation of Two Pain Assessment Tools Using a Standardized Nociceptive Stimulation in Critically Ill Adults.重症成人使用标准化伤害性刺激验证两种疼痛评估工具。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Oct;56(4):594-601. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.06.014.
7
Use of the critical-care pain observation tool and the bispectral index for the detection of pain in brain-injured patients undergoing mechanical ventilation: A STROBE-compliant observational study.使用重症监护疼痛观察工具和脑电双频指数检测接受机械通气的脑损伤患者的疼痛:一项符合STROBE标准的观察性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jun;97(22):e10985. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010985.
8
Validation of the critical-care pain observation tool in adult patients.成人患者重症监护疼痛观察工具的验证
Am J Crit Care. 2006 Jul;15(4):420-7.
9
An exploratory study of the bilateral bispectral index for pain detection in traumatic-brain-injured patients with altered level of consciousness.一项关于双侧脑电双频指数用于检测意识水平改变的创伤性脑损伤患者疼痛的探索性研究。
J Neurosci Nurs. 2015 Jun;47(3):166-77. doi: 10.1097/JNN.0000000000000137.
10
A Turkish Version of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool: Reliability and Validity Assessment.危重症疼痛观察工具的土耳其语版本:信度与效度评估
J Perianesth Nurs. 2017 Aug;32(4):341-351. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2015.12.015. Epub 2016 Nov 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Sleuthing subjectivity: a review of covert measures of consciousness.探寻主观性:意识隐蔽测量方法综述
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2025 May 23. doi: 10.1038/s41583-025-00934-1.
2
Interrater Agreement between Bedside and Video Raters Using the CPOT-Neuro for Pain Assessment in Critically Ill Patients with a Brain Injury.使用CPOT-Neuro对脑损伤重症患者进行疼痛评估时床边评估者与视频评估者之间的评分者间一致性
Nurs Rep. 2024 Jan 19;14(1):212-219. doi: 10.3390/nursrep14010017.
3
Validation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool-Neuro in brain-injured adults in the intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study.

本文引用的文献

1
Detecting pain in traumatic brain-injured patients with different levels of consciousness during common procedures in the ICU: typical or atypical behaviors?在重症监护病房的常规操作过程中,检测不同意识水平的创伤性脑损伤患者的疼痛:典型行为还是非典型行为?
Clin J Pain. 2014 Nov;30(11):960-9. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000061.
2
Validation and evaluation of two observational pain assessment tools in a trauma and neurosurgical intensive care unit.验证和评估创伤和神经外科重症监护病房中两种观察性疼痛评估工具。
Pain Res Manag. 2013 Nov-Dec;18(6):e107-14. doi: 10.1155/2013/263104.
3
Clinical practice guidelines for the management of pain, agitation, and delirium in adult patients in the intensive care unit.
重症监护疼痛观察工具-神经在 ICU 脑损伤成人中的验证:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Crit Care. 2021 Apr 13;25(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03561-1.
4
Evaluation of Nociception Using Quantitative Pupillometry and Skin Conductance in Critically Ill Unconscious Patients: A Pilot Study.使用定量瞳孔测量法和皮肤电导率评估重症昏迷患者的伤害感受:一项初步研究。
Brain Sci. 2021 Jan 15;11(1):109. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11010109.
5
Behavioral Pain Indicators in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury Admitted to an Intensive Care Unit.入住重症监护病房的创伤性脑损伤患者的行为疼痛指标。
J Caring Sci. 2018 Dec 1;7(4):197-203. doi: 10.15171/jcs.2018.030. eCollection 2018 Dec.
成人重症监护病房疼痛、躁动和谵妄管理的临床实践指南。
Crit Care Med. 2013 Jan;41(1):263-306. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182783b72.
4
How to implement monitoring tools for sedation, pain and delirium in the intensive care unit: an experimental cohort study.如何在重症监护病房实施镇静、疼痛和谵妄监测工具:一项实验性队列研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2012 Dec;38(12):1974-81. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2658-1. Epub 2012 Sep 4.
5
A sensitive scale to assess nociceptive pain in patients with disorders of consciousness.一种用于评估意识障碍患者痛觉的敏感量表。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2012 Dec;83(12):1233-7. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2012-302987. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
6
Pain indicators in brain-injured critical care adults: an integrative review.颅脑损伤重症监护成人的疼痛指标:综合评价。
Aust Crit Care. 2012 May;25(2):110-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2011.10.002. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
7
A biopsychosocial formulation of pain communication.疼痛沟通的生物-心理-社会表述。
Psychol Bull. 2011 Nov;137(6):910-939. doi: 10.1037/a0023876.
8
[Critical review of instruments to assess pain in the non communicative brain injured persons in intensive care].[对评估重症监护中无交流能力脑损伤患者疼痛的工具的批判性综述]
Rech Soins Infirm. 2011 Mar(104):64-85.
9
Inter-rater reliability of the Full Outline of UnResponsiveness score and the Glasgow Coma Scale in critically ill patients: a prospective observational study.昏迷患者 Full Outline of UnResponsiveness 评分与格拉斯哥昏迷评分的观察者间信度:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Crit Care. 2010;14(2):R64. doi: 10.1186/cc8963. Epub 2010 Apr 14.
10
[Sedation in neurointensive care unit].[神经重症监护病房中的镇静]
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2009 Dec;28(12):1015-9. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2009.10.003.