• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

COMET计划数据库:2011年至2013年的进展与活动

The COMET Initiative database: progress and activities from 2011 to 2013.

作者信息

Gargon Elizabeth, Williamson Paula R, Altman Douglas G, Blazeby Jane M, Clarke Mike

机构信息

University of Liverpool, Department of Biostatistics, 1st floor Duncan Building, Daulby Street, Liverpool L69 3GA, UK.

出版信息

Trials. 2014 Jul 10;15:279. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-279.

DOI:10.1186/1745-6215-15-279
PMID:25012001
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4107994/
Abstract

The Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) Initiative database is an international repository of studies relevant to the development of core outcome sets. By the end of 2013, it included a unique collection of 306 studies. The website is increasingly being used, with more than 12,000 visits in 2013 (a 55% increase over 2012), 8,369 unique visitors (a 53% increase) and 6,844 new visitors (a 48% increase). There has been a rise in visits from outside the United Kingdom, with 2,405 such visits in 2013 (30% of all visits). By December 2013, a total of 4,205 searches had been completed, with 2,139 in 2013 alone.

摘要

有效性试验核心结局指标(COMET)计划数据库是一个与核心结局集开发相关研究的国际知识库。截至2013年底,它包含了306项研究的独特集合。该网站的使用频率越来越高,2013年的访问量超过12000次(比2012年增长了55%),独立访客8369人(增长了53%),新增访客6844人(增长了48%)。来自英国以外地区的访问量有所增加,2013年有2405次此类访问(占所有访问量的30%)。截至2013年12月,总共完成了4205次搜索,仅2013年就有2139次。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbd7/4107994/5af91bc49b6d/1745-6215-15-279-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbd7/4107994/ad7b3a008617/1745-6215-15-279-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbd7/4107994/5af91bc49b6d/1745-6215-15-279-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbd7/4107994/ad7b3a008617/1745-6215-15-279-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbd7/4107994/5af91bc49b6d/1745-6215-15-279-2.jpg

相似文献

1
The COMET Initiative database: progress and activities from 2011 to 2013.COMET计划数据库:2011年至2013年的进展与活动
Trials. 2014 Jul 10;15:279. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-279.
2
The COMET initiative database: progress and activities update (2014).COMET计划数据库:进展与活动更新(2014年)
Trials. 2015 Nov 11;16:515. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1038-x.
3
The COMET Initiative database: progress and activities update (2015).COMET计划数据库:进展与活动更新(2015年)
Trials. 2017 Feb 3;18(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1788-8.
4
Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative: protocol for an international Delphi study to achieve consensus on how to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a 'core outcome set'.有效性试验核心结局指标(COMET)计划:一项国际德尔菲研究的方案,旨在就如何为“核心结局集”中包含的结局选择结局测量工具达成共识。
Trials. 2014 Jun 25;15:247. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-247.
5
Outcomes and endpoints in trials of cancer treatment: the past, present, and future.癌症治疗试验中的结局和终点:过去、现在和未来。
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Jan;16(1):e32-42. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70375-4. Epub 2014 Dec 29.
6
The project data sphere initiative: accelerating cancer research by sharing data.项目数据领域计划:通过数据共享加速癌症研究
Oncologist. 2015 May;20(5):464-e20. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0431. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
7
Clinical trial registries: more international, converging efforts are needed.临床试验注册机构:需要更多国际化且协同的努力。
Trials. 2017 Feb 27;18(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1836-4.
8
Use of Open Access Platforms for Clinical Trial Data.开放获取平台在临床试验数据中的应用。
JAMA. 2016;315(12):1283-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.2374.
9
Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and User Survey.为比较效果研究选择重要的健康结果:最新综述与用户调查
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 19;11(1):e0146444. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146444. eCollection 2016.
10
The future of clinical trials: A panel discussion.临床试验的未来:小组讨论。
Stat Med. 2012 Nov 10;31(25):3068-72. doi: 10.1002/sim.5484. Epub 2012 Jul 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient reported outcomes used in clinical trials and core outcome sets for individuals with genetic intellectual disability: a scoping review.用于临床试验的患者报告结局以及针对遗传性智力残疾个体的核心结局集:一项范围综述
J Neurodev Disord. 2025 Jul 31;17(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s11689-025-09633-5.
2
Measuring What Matters in Parkinson's Disease Research and Dysphagia: The Need for Core Outcome Sets.衡量帕金森病研究和吞咽困难中的关键因素:核心结局集的必要性。
Mov Disord. 2025 Jul;40(7):1260-1264. doi: 10.1002/mds.30241. Epub 2025 May 23.
3
'Without the Data You're Not Going to Know If It's Important or Not': A Mixed Methods Study on What Dysphagia Intervention Outcomes are Important to People with Parkinson's Disease and Family Members.

本文引用的文献

1
Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: a systematic review.为比较效果研究选择重要的健康结局:一项系统综述。
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 16;9(6):e99111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099111. eCollection 2014.
2
Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing inaccessible research.提高价值,减少浪费:解决研究的不可获取性问题。
Lancet. 2014 Jan 18;383(9913):257-66. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62296-5. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
3
Biomedical research: increasing value, reducing waste.生物医学研究:提高价值,减少浪费。
“没有数据你就无法知道它是否重要”:一项关于吞咽困难干预结果对帕金森病患者及其家庭成员而言何者重要的混合方法研究
Dysphagia. 2024 Dec 7. doi: 10.1007/s00455-024-10788-x.
4
The impact of health and wellness coaching on patient-important outcomes in chronic illness care: A systematic review and meta-analysis.健康和健康促进教练对慢性病护理中患者重要结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Patient Educ Couns. 2023 Dec;117:107975. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107975. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
5
Comparison of published core outcome sets with outcomes recommended in regulatory guidance from the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency: cross sectional analysis.已发表的核心结局集与美国食品药品监督管理局和欧洲药品管理局监管指南中推荐的结局的比较:横断面分析
BMJ Med. 2022 Nov 3;1(1):e000233. doi: 10.1136/bmjmed-2022-000233. eCollection 2022.
6
Reported outcomes in transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas: a systematic review.经蝶窦手术治疗垂体腺瘤的疗效评价:一项系统综述。
Pituitary. 2023 Apr;26(2):171-181. doi: 10.1007/s11102-023-01303-w. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
7
Swallowing outcomes in dysphagia interventions in Parkinson's disease: a scoping review.帕金森病吞咽障碍干预措施的吞咽结局:范围综述。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2023 Apr;28(2):111-118. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112082. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
8
Systematic review of outcome reporting in studies of SCD and pregnancy: marked heterogeneity hinders meaningful data synthesis.镰状细胞病(SCD)与妊娠研究中结果报告的系统评价:显著的异质性阻碍了有意义的数据综合。
Blood Adv. 2023 May 23;7(10):2004-2007. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022007089.
9
A core outcome set for clinical trials of first- and second-degree perineal tears prevention and treatment: a study protocol for a systematic review and a Delphi survey.用于初次和二度会阴撕裂预防和治疗临床试验的核心结局集:系统评价和德尔菲调查的研究方案。
Trials. 2021 Nov 25;22(1):843. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05820-6.
10
Mindfulness-based interventions for medication adherence: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.基于正念的药物依从性干预措施:系统评价与叙述性综合分析
J Psychosom Res. 2021 Oct;149:110585. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110585. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
Lancet. 2014 Jan 11;383(9912):101-4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62329-6. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
4
Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider.制定临床试验核心结局集:需要考虑的问题。
Trials. 2012 Aug 6;13:132. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-132.
5
Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews.规范临床试验和系统评价的结果。
Trials. 2007 Nov 26;8:39. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-8-39.