• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

COMET计划数据库:进展与活动更新(2014年)

The COMET initiative database: progress and activities update (2014).

作者信息

Gargon Elizabeth, Williamson Paula R, Altman Doug G, Blazeby Jane M, Clarke Mike

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Block F Waterhouse Building, 1-5 Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK.

Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Windmill Road, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK.

出版信息

Trials. 2015 Nov 11;16:515. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1038-x.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-015-1038-x
PMID:26558998
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4642751/
Abstract

The COMET Initiative database is a repository of studies relevant to the development of core outcome sets (COS). Use of the website continues to increase, with more than 16,500 visits in 2014 (36 % increase over 2013), 12,257 unique visitors (47 % increase), 9780 new visitors (43 % increase) and a rise in the proportion of visits from outside the UK (8565 visits; 51 % of all visits). By December 2014, a total of 6588 searches had been completed, with 2383 in 2014 alone (11 % increase). The growing awareness of the need for COS is reflected in the website and database usage figures.

摘要

COMET计划数据库是一个与核心结局集(COS)开发相关研究的资料库。该网站的访问量持续增长,2014年访问量超过16500次(比2013年增长36%),独立访客12257人(增长47%),新访客9780人(增长43%),来自英国以外地区的访问比例也有所上升(8565次访问;占所有访问量的51%)。截至2014年12月,总共完成了6588次搜索,仅2014年就有2383次(增长11%)。对COS需求的日益认识体现在网站和数据库的使用数据中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e30c/4642751/25d7dc6a6e64/13063_2015_1038_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e30c/4642751/25d7dc6a6e64/13063_2015_1038_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e30c/4642751/25d7dc6a6e64/13063_2015_1038_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The COMET initiative database: progress and activities update (2014).COMET计划数据库:进展与活动更新(2014年)
Trials. 2015 Nov 11;16:515. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1038-x.
2
The COMET Initiative database: progress and activities from 2011 to 2013.COMET计划数据库:2011年至2013年的进展与活动
Trials. 2014 Jul 10;15:279. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-279.
3
The COMET Initiative database: progress and activities update (2015).COMET计划数据库:进展与活动更新(2015年)
Trials. 2017 Feb 3;18(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1788-8.
4
Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and User Survey.为比较效果研究选择重要的健康结果:最新综述与用户调查
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 19;11(1):e0146444. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146444. eCollection 2016.
5
Use of Open Access Platforms for Clinical Trial Data.开放获取平台在临床试验数据中的应用。
JAMA. 2016;315(12):1283-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.2374.
6
The project data sphere initiative: accelerating cancer research by sharing data.项目数据领域计划:通过数据共享加速癌症研究
Oncologist. 2015 May;20(5):464-e20. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0431. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
7
Cochrane Stroke Group 10 years on: progress to date and future challenges.Cochrane卒中小组成立10周年:迄今取得的进展及未来挑战。
Stroke. 2003 Oct;34(10):2537-9. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000089016.77502.59. Epub 2003 Sep 18.
8
The BrainIT Group: concept and current status 2004.BrainIT 集团:2004年的概念与现状
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2005;95:33-7. doi: 10.1007/3-211-32318-x_8.
9
Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and Identification of Gaps.为比较效果研究选择重要的健康结局:最新综述与差距识别
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 14;11(12):e0168403. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168403. eCollection 2016.
10
Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative: protocol for an international Delphi study to achieve consensus on how to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a 'core outcome set'.有效性试验核心结局指标(COMET)计划:一项国际德尔菲研究的方案,旨在就如何为“核心结局集”中包含的结局选择结局测量工具达成共识。
Trials. 2014 Jun 25;15:247. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-247.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of surrogate endpoints in health technology assessment and reimbursement of treatments for the management of chronic kidney disease.替代终点在慢性肾脏病治疗管理的卫生技术评估及报销中的应用
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Aug 29;88:103465. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103465. eCollection 2025 Oct.
2
Completeness and Mismatch of Patient-Important Outcomes After Trauma.创伤后患者重要结局的完整性与不匹配性
Ann Surg Open. 2022 Nov 7;3(4):e211. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000211. eCollection 2022 Dec.
3
Outcome domains measured in randomized controlled trials of physical activity for older adults: a rapid review.

本文引用的文献

1
Group seeks standardization for what clinical trials must measure.该组织寻求临床试验必须测量内容的标准化。
Nat Med. 2014 Aug;20(8):798-9. doi: 10.1038/nm0814-798.
2
The COMET Initiative database: progress and activities from 2011 to 2013.COMET计划数据库:2011年至2013年的进展与活动
Trials. 2014 Jul 10;15:279. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-279.
3
Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: a systematic review.为比较效果研究选择重要的健康结局:一项系统综述。
随机对照试验中测量老年人身体活动的结局指标:快速综述。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023 Mar 24;20(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12966-023-01431-3.
4
Core outcome sets through the healthcare ecosystem: the case of type 2 diabetes mellitus.贯穿医疗保健生态系统的核心结局集:以 2 型糖尿病为例。
Trials. 2020 Jun 25;21(1):570. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04403-1.
5
Patient-important outcomes and core outcome sets: increased attention needed!患者重要结局与核心结局集:需要更多关注!
Br J Anaesth. 2019 Apr;122(4):408-410. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.02.007. Epub 2019 Feb 23.
6
Outcome Selection and Methodological Quality of Major and Minor Shoulder Surgery Studies: A Scoping Review.主要和次要肩部手术研究的结局选择和方法学质量:范围综述。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Mar;477(3):606-619. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000578.
7
IMPART systematic review of education for healthcare professionals implementing supported self-management for asthma.对面向哮喘患者的支持性自我管理的医疗专业人员教育进行系统评价。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2018 Nov 6;28(1):42. doi: 10.1038/s41533-018-0108-4.
8
Development of an online resource for recruitment research in clinical trials to organise and map current literature.开发一个在线资源,用于临床试验中的招聘研究,以组织和绘制当前文献。
Clin Trials. 2018 Dec;15(6):533-542. doi: 10.1177/1740774518796156. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
9
Methods to identify and prioritize patient-centered outcomes for use in comparative effectiveness research.用于比较效果研究中识别以患者为中心的结局并确定其优先级的方法。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 Jun 12;4:95. doi: 10.1186/s40814-018-0284-6. eCollection 2018.
10
Avoidable waste of research related to outcome planning and reporting in clinical trials.避免临床试验中结局计划和报告相关的研究浪费。
BMC Med. 2018 Jun 11;16(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1083-x.
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 16;9(6):e99111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099111. eCollection 2014.
4
Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews.规范临床试验和系统评价的结果。
Trials. 2007 Nov 26;8:39. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-8-39.