• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

MRI显示有结构性病变的部分性癫痫对抗癫痫药物的反应

Response to antiepileptic drugs in partial epilepsy with structural lesions on MRI.

作者信息

Park Kang Min, Shin Kyong Jin, Ha Sam Yeol, Park JinSe, Kim Si Eun, Kim Sung Eun

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea.

Department of Neurology, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014 Aug;123:64-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.04.029. Epub 2014 May 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.04.029
PMID:25012014
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Although partial epilepsy with structural lesions on MRI (lesional epilepsy) is less favorably responsive to antiepileptics than those without structural lesions on MRI, the response to antiepileptics in lesional epilepsy is a heterogeneous condition. There is growing evidence that the extent of epileptic network beyond the visible lesion on MRI may be related with the response to antiepileptics. The aims of this study are to clarify whether (1) the epilepsy network beyond the visible lesion on MRI, or (2) duration of lesional epilepsy on MRI are related with the response to antiepileptics or not.

METHODS

The inclusion criteria for this study were (1) having structural lesions on MRI, (2) taking antiepileptics for at least 1 year, and (3) age ≥13 years old. The definition for drug-resistance epilepsy was a failure of adequate trials of two tolerated, appropriately chosen and used antiepileptics to achieve sustained seizure freedom. The duration was defined as the interval between the start of antiepileptics and the last follow-up. We defined the lesion-plus group as the structural lesions on MRI that has wider spread of epileptic network beyond the visible lesions on MRI, such as hippocampal sclerosis and malformation of cortical development. Lesion-restriction group was defined as the epileptic network being believed to be limited on the structural lesions.

RESULTS

We found 234 patients with lesional epilepsy, who met the inclusion criteria. Of these 234 patients, 115 patients were male (49%) and 119 patients were female (51%). The median age was 22 years old (range 13-78 years old) and the median duration was 131 months (range 12-516 months). Forty percent (90/234 patients) were intractable to antiepileptics. Of the structural lesions on MRI, hippocampal sclerosis was most frequent (N=90). Other structural lesions were malformation of cortical development (N=38), cerebromalatic lesions related with trauma (N=34), tumor (N=19), cystic lesion (N=15), cerebral infarction (N=11), vascular malformation (N=10), and other miscellaneous lesion (N=24). Lesion-plus group had significantly higher drug-resistance epilepsy than cystic lesions on MRI (60/128 vs. 2/15, p=0.013 by Fisher's exact test). There was a tendency of having more drug-resistance epilepsy in the lesion-plus group than the lesion-restriction group (56/121 vs. 30/89, p=0.09 by Chi-square test). The median duration in drug-resistance epilepsy was significantly longer than that of medically controlled epilepsy (178 months (range 23-516 months) vs 102 months (range 12-479 months), p<0.0001 by Mann-Whitney test). In addition, duration was only the significant variable associated with drug-resistance epilepsy in lesional epilepsy by multiple logistic regression analysis (p=0.02 for overall model fit).

CONCLUSION

In lesional epilepsy, hippocampal sclerosis and malformation of cortical development are more intractable to antiepileptics, reflecting wider epileptic network beyond the visible lesion. In addition, the response to antiepileptics may be expected to decrease when the duration is prolonged.

摘要

目的

尽管磁共振成像(MRI)显示有结构损伤的部分性癫痫(损伤性癫痫)对抗癫痫药物的反应不如MRI无结构损伤的癫痫,但损伤性癫痫对抗癫痫药物的反应存在异质性。越来越多的证据表明,MRI上可见损伤之外的癫痫网络范围可能与对抗癫痫药物的反应有关。本研究的目的是明确:(1)MRI上可见损伤之外的癫痫网络,或(2)MRI上损伤性癫痫的病程,是否与对抗癫痫药物的反应相关。

方法

本研究的纳入标准为:(1)MRI有结构损伤;(2)服用抗癫痫药物至少1年;(3)年龄≥13岁。耐药性癫痫的定义为:充分试用两种耐受、适当选择和使用的抗癫痫药物后仍未能实现持续无癫痫发作。病程定义为开始服用抗癫痫药物至最后一次随访的时间间隔。我们将损伤加组定义为MRI上的结构损伤,其癫痫网络在MRI可见损伤之外有更广泛的扩散,如海马硬化和皮质发育畸形。损伤局限组定义为癫痫网络被认为局限于结构损伤。

结果

我们发现234例符合纳入标准的损伤性癫痫患者。在这234例患者中,115例为男性(49%),119例为女性(51%)。中位年龄为22岁(范围13 - 78岁),中位病程为131个月(范围12 - 516个月)。40%(90/234例患者)对抗癫痫药物难治。在MRI上的结构损伤中,海马硬化最为常见(N = 90)。其他结构损伤包括皮质发育畸形(N = 38)、与创伤相关的脑软化病变(N = 34)、肿瘤(N = 19)、囊性病变(N = 15)、脑梗死(N = 11)、血管畸形(N = 10)和其他杂类病变(N = 24)。损伤加组的耐药性癫痫显著高于MRI上的囊性病变(60/128 vs. 2/15,Fisher精确检验p = 0.013)。损伤加组的耐药性癫痫有多于损伤局限组的趋势(56/121 vs. 30/89,卡方检验p = 0.09)。耐药性癫痫的中位病程显著长于药物控制的癫痫(178个月(范围23 - 516个月)vs 102个月(范围12 - 479个月),Mann-Whitney检验p < 0.0001)。此外,通过多因素逻辑回归分析,病程是损伤性癫痫中与耐药性癫痫相关的唯一显著变量(总体模型拟合p = 0.02)。

结论

在损伤性癫痫中,海马硬化和皮质发育畸形对抗癫痫药物更难治,反映出可见损伤之外有更广泛的癫痫网络。此外,病程延长时,对抗癫痫药物的反应可能会降低。

相似文献

1
Response to antiepileptic drugs in partial epilepsy with structural lesions on MRI.MRI显示有结构性病变的部分性癫痫对抗癫痫药物的反应
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014 Aug;123:64-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.04.029. Epub 2014 May 14.
2
[Contribution of MRI to the exploration of partial refractory epilepsy].[磁共振成像在部分性难治性癫痫检查中的作用]
Rev Neurol (Paris). 2004 Jun;160 Spec No 1:5S91-7.
3
New-onset temporal lobe epilepsy in children: lesion on MRI predicts poor seizure outcome.儿童新发颞叶癫痫:MRI上的病灶预示癫痫发作预后不良。
Neurology. 2006 Dec 26;67(12):2147-53. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000248189.93630.4f. Epub 2006 Nov 2.
4
Prevalence of nonlesional focal epilepsy in an adult epilepsy clinic.成人癫痫诊所中非病灶性局灶性癫痫的患病率。
Can J Neurol Sci. 2013 Mar;40(2):198-202. doi: 10.1017/s0317167100013731.
5
Classification of structural lesions in magnetic resonance imaging. Surgical implications in drug-resistant epilepsy patients.磁共振成像中结构病变的分类。对耐药性癫痫患者的手术意义。
Rev Neurol. 2015 Sep 16;61(6):241-8.
6
Clinical characteristics in focal cortical dysplasia: a retrospective evaluation in a series of 120 patients.局灶性皮质发育不良的临床特征:对120例患者的回顾性评估
Brain. 2006 Jul;129(Pt 7):1907-16. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl133. Epub 2006 May 19.
7
Experience with lacosamide in a series of children with drug-resistant focal epilepsy.拉考沙胺治疗耐药性局灶性癫痫儿童系列病例的经验。
Pediatr Neurol. 2011 Jun;44(6):414-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2010.12.003.
8
SEEG-guided RF-thermocoagulation of epileptic foci: a therapeutic alternative for drug-resistant non-operable partial epilepsies.立体定向脑电图引导下癫痫灶射频热凝术:耐药性不可手术的部分性癫痫的一种治疗选择。
Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg. 2011;36:61-78. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-0179-7_4.
9
Loss of network efficiency associated with cognitive decline in chronic epilepsy.认知衰退与慢性癫痫相关的网络效率降低。
Neurology. 2011 Sep 6;77(10):938-44. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31822cfc2f. Epub 2011 Aug 10.
10
[Cost-effectiveness of epilepsy surgery in a cohort of patients with medically intractable partial epilepsy--preliminary results].[一组药物难治性部分性癫痫患者癫痫手术的成本效益——初步结果]
Rev Neurol (Paris). 2004 Jun;160 Spec No 1:5S354-67.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostication in Epilepsy with Integrated Analysis of Blood Parameters and Clinical Data.结合血液参数与临床数据对癫痫进行预后评估
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 18;13(18):5517. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185517.
2
Early epilepsy surgery for non drug-resistant patients.非耐药患者的早期癫痫手术
Epilepsy Behav Rep. 2022 Apr 21;19:100542. doi: 10.1016/j.ebr.2022.100542. eCollection 2022.
3
Factors not considered in the study of drug-resistant epilepsy: Psychiatric comorbidities, age, and gender.耐药性癫痫研究中未考虑的因素:精神共病、年龄和性别。
Epilepsia Open. 2022 Aug;7 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S81-S93. doi: 10.1002/epi4.12576. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
4
Predicting the antiepileptic drug response by brain connectivity in newly diagnosed focal epilepsy.基于脑连接预测新诊断局灶性癫痫的抗癫痫药物反应。
J Neurol. 2020 Apr;267(4):1179-1187. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-09697-4. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
5
Long-term follow-up of a large cohort with focal epilepsy of unknown cause: deciphering their clinical and prognostic characteristics.不明原因局灶性癫痫的大样本队列的长期随访:解析其临床和预后特征。
J Neurol. 2020 Mar;267(3):838-847. doi: 10.1007/s00415-019-09656-8. Epub 2019 Dec 2.