• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同人群亲密关系体验问卷的测量不变性。

Measurement invariance of the experiences in close relationships questionnaire across different populations.

机构信息

Sapienza Università di Roma (Italy).

Istituto Superiore di Sanità (Italy).

出版信息

Span J Psychol. 2014;17:E22. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2014.19.

DOI:10.1017/sjp.2014.19
PMID:25012389
Abstract

The measurement invariance of the Experiences in Close Relationships (ECR) questionnaire was investigated across four samples of non-clinical subjects (N = 222), dermatological patients (N = 458), psychiatric inpatients (N = 156), and patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (N = 101). The results provided evidence of configural, metric, and scalar invariance across groups. Overall, our findings provide further support to the reliability and validity of the ECR.

摘要

本研究考察了非临床受试者(N=222)、皮肤科患者(N=458)、精神科住院患者(N=156)和耐药性癫痫患者(N=101)四个样本中亲密关系经历问卷(ECR)的测量不变性。结果表明,组间具有构念不变性、度量不变性和标度不变性。总的来说,我们的研究结果进一步支持了 ECR 的信度和效度。

相似文献

1
Measurement invariance of the experiences in close relationships questionnaire across different populations.不同人群亲密关系体验问卷的测量不变性。
Span J Psychol. 2014;17:E22. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2014.19.
2
Validation of a 16-Item Short Form of the Czech Version of the Experiences in Close Relationships Revised Questionnaire in a Representative Sample.在一个代表性样本中对捷克语版亲密关系经验修订问卷16项简表的验证。
Psychol Rep. 2016 Dec;119(3):804-825. doi: 10.1177/0033294116667725. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
3
Psychometrics and validity of the Dutch Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised (ECR-r) in an outpatient mental health sample.荷兰亲密关系经验修订量表(ECR-r)在门诊心理健康样本中的心理测量学和效度。
J Pers Assess. 2013;95(2):217-24. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2012.740540. Epub 2012 Nov 26.
4
Romantic attachment in Chilean adults: development of a short-form version of the experiences in close relationships.智利成年人的浪漫依恋:亲密关系体验简短版的编制。
Span J Psychol. 2013;16:E61. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2013.64.
5
Assessing adult attachment across different contexts: validation of the Portuguese version of the experiences in Close Relationships-Relationship Structures questionnaire.评估不同情境下的成人依恋:《亲密关系-关系结构问卷》葡萄牙语版本的效度验证
J Pers Assess. 2015;97(1):22-30. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2014.950377. Epub 2014 Aug 30.
6
Reliability and validity of the Experiences in Close Relationships Scale-12: Attachment dimensions in a clinical sample with eating disorders.亲密关系体验量表-12的信效度:进食障碍临床样本中的依恋维度
Int J Eat Disord. 2018 Jan;51(1):18-27. doi: 10.1002/eat.22807. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
7
The Experiences in Close Relationship Scale (ECR)-short form: reliability, validity, and factor structure.亲密关系体验量表(ECR)简版:信度、效度与因子结构
J Pers Assess. 2007 Apr;88(2):187-204. doi: 10.1080/00223890701268041.
8
Structure and Measurement Invariance of Adult Romantic Attachment.成人浪漫依恋的结构和测量不变性。
J Pers Assess. 2019 Mar-Apr;101(2):171-180. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2017.1391274. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
9
A Serbian version of modified and revised Experiences in Close Relationships scale (SM-ECR-R).一份经过修改和修订的亲密关系经历量表(SM-ECR-R)的塞尔维亚语版本。
J Pers Assess. 2013;95(5):530-8. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2013.778271. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
10
Evaluation of a short version of the Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised questionnaire (ECR-RD8): results from a representative German sample.亲密关系经历量表修订版(ECR-RD8)短版评估:来自代表性德国样本的结果。
BMC Psychol. 2021 Sep 14;9(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00637-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Self-Schema, Attachment Style, and Treatment Outcome of Patients in an Opiate Maintenance Treatment Unit.阿片类药物维持治疗单元中患者的自我图式、依恋风格与治疗结果
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 23;12:595883. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.595883. eCollection 2021.
2
Attachment in Patients with Bipolar and Unipolar Depression: A Comparison with Clinical and Non-clinical Controls.双相抑郁和单相抑郁患者的依恋:与临床及非临床对照的比较
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2019 Dec 31;15:143-152. doi: 10.2174/1745017901915010143. eCollection 2019.