Wei Meifen, Russell Daniel W, Mallinckrodt Brent, Vogel David L
Department of Psychology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011-3180, USA.
J Pers Assess. 2007 Apr;88(2):187-204. doi: 10.1080/00223890701268041.
We developed a 12-item, short form of the Experiences in Close Relationship Scale (ECR; Brennan, Clark, & Shaver, 1998) across 6 studies. In Study 1, we examined the reliability and factor structure of the measure. In Studies 2 and 3, we cross-validated the reliability, factor structure, and validity of the short form measure; whereas in Study 4, we examined test-retest reliability over a 1-month period. In Studies 5 and 6, we further assessed the reliability, factor structure, and validity of the short version of the ECR when administered as a stand-alone instrument. Confirmatory factor analyses indicated that 2 factors, labeled Anxiety and Avoidance, provided a good fit to the data after removing the influence of response sets. We found validity to be equivalent for the short and the original versions of the ECR across studies. Finally, the results were comparable when we embedded the short form within the original version of the ECR and when we administered it as a stand-alone measure.
我们在6项研究中开发了亲密关系体验量表（ECR；Brennan、Clark和Shaver，1998）的一个包含12个条目的简版。在研究1中，我们检验了该测量方法的信度和因子结构。在研究2和3中，我们对简版测量方法的信度、因子结构和效度进行了交叉验证；而在研究4中，我们考察了1个月期间的重测信度。在研究5和6中，我们进一步评估了作为独立工具使用时ECR简版的信度、因子结构和效度。验证性因子分析表明，在去除反应定势的影响后，标记为焦虑和回避的两个因子与数据拟合良好。我们发现在各项研究中，ECR简版和原版的效度相当。最后，当我们将简版嵌入ECR原版中以及将其作为独立测量方法使用时，结果具有可比性。
