Suppr超能文献

通过高密度标测和起搏体表心电图分析显示,早期致心律失常性右室心肌病与良性流出道异位心律的动态传导和复极变化

Dynamic conduction and repolarisation changes in early arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy versus benign outflow tract ectopy demonstrated by high density mapping & paced surface ECG analysis.

作者信息

Finlay Malcolm C, Ahmed Akbar K, Sugrue Alan, Bhar-Amato Justine, Quarta Giovanni, Pantazis Antonis, Ciaccio Edward J, Syrris Petros, Sen-Chowdhry Srijita, Ben-Simon Ron, Chow Anthony W, Lowe Martin D, Segal Oliver R, McKenna William J, Lambiase Pier D

机构信息

Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 Jul 11;9(7):e99125. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099125. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

AIMS

The concealed phase of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) may initially manifest electrophysiologically. No studies have examined dynamic conduction/repolarization kinetics to distinguish benign right ventricular outflow tract ectopy (RVOT ectopy) from ARVC's early phase. We investigated dynamic endocardial electrophysiological changes that differentiate early ARVC disease expression from RVOT ectopy.

METHODS

22 ARVC (12 definite based upon family history and mutation carrier status, 10 probable) patients without right ventricular structural anomalies underwent high-density non-contact mapping of the right ventricle. These were compared to data from 14 RVOT ectopy and 12 patients with supraventricular tachycardias and normal hearts. Endocardial & surface ECG conduction and repolarization parameters were assessed during a standard S1-S2 restitution protocol.

RESULTS

Definite ARVC without RV structural disease could not be clearly distinguished from RVOT ectopy during sinus rhythm or during steady state pacing. Delay in Activation Times at coupling intervals just above the ventricular effective refractory period (VERP) increased in definite ARVC (43 ± 20 ms) more than RVOT ectopy patients (36 ± 14 ms, p = 0.03) or Normals (25 ± 16 ms, p = 0.008) and a progressive separation of the repolarisation time curves between groups existed. Repolarization time increases in the RVOT were also greatest in ARVC (definite ARVC: 18 ± 20 ms; RVOT ectopy: 5 ± 14, Normal: 1 ± 18, p<0.05). Surface ECG correlates of these intracardiac measurements demonstrated an increase of greater than 48 ms in stimulus to surface ECG J-point pre-ERP versus steady state, with an 88% specificity and 68% sensitivity in distinguishing definite ARVC from the other groups. This technique could not distinguish patients with genetic predisposition to ARVC only (probable ARVC) from controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant changes in dynamic conduction and repolarization are apparent in early ARVC before detectable RV structural abnormalities, and were present to a lesser degree in probable ARVC patients. Investigation of dynamic electrophysiological parameters may be useful to identify concealed ARVC in patients without disease pedigrees by using endocardial electrogram or paced ECG parameters.

摘要

目的

致心律失常性右室心肌病(ARVC)的隐匿期最初可能在电生理方面表现出来。尚无研究通过检测动态传导/复极化动力学来区分良性右室流出道早搏(RVOT早搏)与ARVC的早期阶段。我们研究了能将ARVC疾病早期表现与RVOT早搏区分开来的动态心内膜电生理变化。

方法

22例无右室结构异常的ARVC患者(12例根据家族史和突变携带者状态确诊,10例疑似)接受了右室高密度非接触标测。将这些数据与14例RVOT早搏患者以及12例室上性心动过速且心脏正常患者的数据进行比较。在标准的S1 - S2恢复方案期间评估心内膜和体表心电图的传导及复极化参数。

结果

在窦性心律或稳态起搏期间,无右室结构疾病的确诊ARVC与RVOT早搏无法明确区分。在刚好高于心室有效不应期(VERP)的耦合间期,确诊ARVC患者的激活时间延迟增加(43±20毫秒),高于RVOT早搏患者(36±14毫秒,p = 0.03)或正常人群(25±16毫秒,p = 0.008),且各组之间复极化时间曲线逐渐分离。ARVC患者右室流出道的复极化时间增加也最为显著(确诊ARVC:18±20毫秒;RVOT早搏:5±14毫秒,正常:1±18毫秒,p<0.05)。这些心内测量的体表心电图相关性显示,刺激至体表心电图J点在ERP前与稳态相比增加超过48毫秒,在区分确诊ARVC与其他组时特异性为88%,敏感性为68%。该技术无法区分仅具有ARVC遗传易感性的患者(疑似ARVC)与对照组。

结论

在可检测到右室结构异常之前,早期ARVC就已出现明显的动态传导和复极化变化,疑似ARVC患者的这些变化程度较轻。通过使用心内膜电图或起搏心电图参数研究动态电生理参数,可能有助于识别无疾病家族史患者中的隐匿性ARVC。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ec8/4094482/b7d147dbcff3/pone.0099125.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验