Ainsworth Craig D, Skanes Allan C, Klein George J, Gula Lorne J, Yee Raymond, Krahn Andrew D
Division of Cardiology, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
Heart Rhythm. 2006 Apr;3(4):416-23. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2005.12.024.
Ventricular tachycardia (VT) resulting from arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) may be difficult to differentiate from idiopathic right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) VT.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the hypothesis that QRS characteristics would be different in ARVC because of altered conduction through abnormal myocardium.
In 24 RVOT VT patients (18 women and 6 men; age 42 +/- 10 years) and 20 ARVC patients (12 women and 8 men; age 38 +/- 14 years), mean QRS duration, frontal plane axis, and precordial R-wave transition were measured in 12-lead ECGs recorded during VT.
Mean QRS duration was longer in all 12 leads in ARVC patients. A significant difference was noted in leads I, III, aVL, aVF, V(1), V(2), and V(3) (P <.05). Leads I and aVL had the largest mean difference between ARVC and RVOT VT patients of 17.6 +/- 4.7 ms and 15.8 +/- 7.5 ms, respectively (P <.0001). Lead I QRS duration > or =120 ms had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity 46%, positive predictive value 61%, and negative predictive value 100% for ARVC. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.89. The addition of mean QRS axis <30 degrees (R<S in lead III) to the above criterion increased specificity for ARVC to 100%. QRS duration remained sensitive and specific in the subgroup of nine ARVC ECGs with an inferior axis (ROC area 0.82). R-wave transition was not different between groups.
QRS duration is longer in ARVC compared with RVOT VT. An algorithm combining lead I QRS duration for sensitivity and axis for specificity is useful for differentiating the two tachycardia substrates.
致心律失常性右室心肌病(ARVC)所致的室性心动过速(VT)可能难以与特发性右室流出道(RVOT)VT相鉴别。
本研究旨在探讨由于异常心肌导致传导改变,ARVC患者的QRS波特征会有所不同这一假说。
对24例RVOT VT患者(18例女性,6例男性;年龄42±10岁)和20例ARVC患者(12例女性,8例男性;年龄38±14岁),在VT发作时记录的12导联心电图中测量平均QRS波时限、额面电轴和胸前导联R波移行。
ARVC患者所有12个导联的平均QRS波时限均较长。在I、III、aVL、aVF、V(1)、V(2)和V(3)导联观察到显著差异(P<0.05)。I导联和aVL导联中,ARVC与RVOT VT患者之间的平均差异最大,分别为17.6±4.7 ms和15.8±7.5 ms(P<0.0001)。I导联QRS波时限≥120 ms对ARVC的敏感性为100%,特异性为46%,阳性预测值为61%,阴性预测值为100%。受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积为0.89。将平均QRS电轴<30度(III导联R<S)加入上述标准可使ARVC的特异性提高到100%。在9例下壁电轴的ARVC心电图亚组中,QRS波时限仍具有敏感性和特异性(ROC面积0.82)。两组间R波移行无差异。
与RVOT VT相比,ARVC患者的QRS波时限更长。一种结合I导联QRS波时限的敏感性和电轴的特异性的算法有助于鉴别这两种心动过速的基质。