Rao Satish S C
Department of Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Digestive Health Center, Medical College of Georgia, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, GA.
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014 Oct;48(9):752-64. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000180.
Fecal incontinence (FI) is a multifactorial disorder that imposes considerable social and economic burdens. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of current and emerging treatment options for FI. A MEDLINE search was conducted for English-language articles related to FI prevalence, etiology, diagnosis, and treatment published from January 1, 1990 through June 1, 2013. The search was extended to unpublished trials on ClinicalTrials.gov and relevant publications cited in included articles. Conservative approaches, including dietary modifications, medications, muscle-strengthening exercises, and biofeedback, have been shown to provide short-term benefits. Transcutaneous electrical stimulation was considered ineffective in a randomized clinical trial. Unlike initial studies, sacral nerve stimulation has shown reasonable short-term effectiveness and some complications. Dynamic graciloplasty and artificial sphincter and bowel devices lack randomized controlled trials and have shown inconsistent results and high rates of explantation. Of injectable bulking agents, dextranomer microspheres in non-animal stabilized hyaluronic acid (NASHA Dx) has shown significant improvement in incontinence scores and frequency of incontinence episodes, with generally mild adverse effects. For the treatment of FI, conservative measures and biofeedback therapy are modestly effective. When conservative therapies are ineffective, invasive procedures, including sacral nerve stimulation, may be considered, but they are associated with complications and lack randomized, controlled trials. Bulking agents may be an appropriate alternative therapy to consider before more aggressive therapies in patients who fail conservative therapies.
大便失禁(FI)是一种多因素导致的疾病,会带来相当大的社会和经济负担。本文旨在概述FI目前及新出现的治疗选择。对1990年1月1日至2013年6月1日发表的与FI患病率、病因、诊断和治疗相关的英文文章进行了MEDLINE检索。检索范围扩大到ClinicalTrials.gov上未发表的试验以及纳入文章中引用的相关出版物。保守治疗方法,包括饮食调整、药物治疗、肌肉强化锻炼和生物反馈,已显示出能带来短期益处。经皮电刺激在一项随机临床试验中被认为无效。与最初的研究不同,骶神经刺激已显示出合理的短期疗效和一些并发症。动态股薄肌成形术、人工括约肌和肠道装置缺乏随机对照试验,结果不一致且取出率高。在非动物稳定透明质酸(NASHA Dx)中的葡聚糖微球注射填充剂在失禁评分和失禁发作频率方面有显著改善,且一般不良反应较轻。对于FI的治疗,保守措施和生物反馈疗法有一定效果。当保守治疗无效时,可考虑包括骶神经刺激在内的侵入性手术,但这些手术会伴有并发症且缺乏随机对照试验。对于保守治疗失败的患者,在采用更积极的治疗方法之前,填充剂可能是一种合适的替代治疗方法。