Departments of 1 Trauma, Hand, and Reconstructive Surgery and.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Oct;21(4):634-9. doi: 10.3171/2014.6.SPINE13523. Epub 2014 Jul 11.
Injuries of the subaxial cervical spine including facet joints and posterior ligaments are common. Potential surgical treatments consist of anterior, posterior, or anterior-posterior fixation. Because each approach has its advantages and disadvantages, the best treatment is debated. This biomechanical cadaver study compared the effect of different facet joint injuries on primary stability following anterior plate fixation.
Fractures and plate fixation were performed on 15 fresh-frozen intact cervical spines (C3-T1). To simulate a translation-rotation injury in all groups, complete ligament rupture and facet dislocation were simulated by dissecting the entire posterior and anterior ligament complex between C-4 and C-5. In the first group, the facet joints were left intact. In the second group, one facet joint between C-4 and C-5 was removed and the other side was left intact. In the third group, both facet joints between C-4 and C-5 were removed. The authors next performed single-level anterior discectomy and interbody grafting using bone material from the respective thoracic vertebral bodies. An anterior cervical locking plate was used for fixation. Continuous loading was performed using a servohydraulic test bench at 2 N/sec. The mean load failure was measured when the implant failed.
In the group in which both facet joints were intact, the mean load failure was 174.6 ± 46.93 N. The mean load failure in the second group where only one facet joint was removed was 127.8 ± 22.83 N. In the group in which both facet joints were removed, the mean load failure was 73.42 ± 32.51 N. There was a significant difference between the first group (both facet joints intact) and the third group (both facet joints removed) (p < 0.05, Kruskal-Wallis test).
In this cadaver study, primary stability of anterior plate fixation for dislocation injuries of the subaxial cervical spine was dependent on the presence of the facet joints. If the bone in one or both facet joints is damaged in the clinical setting, anterior plate fixation in combination with bone grafting might not provide sufficient stabilization; additional posterior stabilization may be needed.
下颈椎(包括关节突关节和后方韧带)损伤较为常见。潜在的手术治疗方法包括前路、后路或前后路固定。由于每种方法都有其优缺点,因此最佳治疗方案存在争议。本生物力学尸体研究比较了不同关节突关节损伤对前路钢板固定后颈椎下位颈椎稳定性的影响。
在 15 个新鲜冷冻完整颈椎(C3-T1)上进行骨折和钢板固定。为了模拟所有组的平移旋转损伤,通过在 C-4 和 C-5 之间解剖整个后韧带复合体和前韧带复合体,模拟完全韧带断裂和关节突脱位。在第一组中,关节突关节保持完整。在第二组中,去除 C-4 和 C-5 之间的一个关节突关节,另一侧保持完整。在第三组中,去除 C-4 和 C-5 之间的两个关节突关节。作者随后在相应的胸椎椎体上进行单节段前路椎间盘切除术和椎间植骨。使用前路颈椎锁定钢板进行固定。使用伺服液压试验台以 2 N/sec 的速度进行连续加载。当植入物失效时,测量平均失效负荷。
在关节突关节均完整的组中,平均失效负荷为 174.6 ± 46.93 N。仅去除一个关节突关节的第二组的平均失效负荷为 127.8 ± 22.83 N。在去除两个关节突关节的组中,平均失效负荷为 73.42 ± 32.51 N。第一组(关节突关节均完整)和第三组(关节突关节均去除)之间存在显著差异(p < 0.05,Kruskal-Wallis 检验)。
在这项尸体研究中,前路钢板固定在下颈椎下位颈椎脱位损伤的初步稳定性取决于关节突关节的存在。如果临床中一个或两个关节突关节的骨质受损,前路钢板固定结合植骨可能无法提供足够的稳定性;可能需要额外的后路稳定。