• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[阅读任务对从多篇文本中学习的影响]

[The effect of reading tasks on learning from multiple texts].

作者信息

Kobayashi Keiichi

出版信息

Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2014 Jun;85(2):203-9. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.85.13309.

DOI:10.4992/jjpsy.85.13309
PMID:25016841
Abstract

This study examined the effect of reading tasks on the integration of content and source information from multiple texts. Undergraduate students (N = 102) read five newspaper articles about a fictitious incident in either a summarization task condition or an evaluation task condition. Then, they performed an integration test and a source choice test, which assessed their understanding of a situation described in the texts and memory for the sources of text information. The results indicated that the summarization and evaluation task groups were not significantly different in situational understanding. However, the summarization task group significantly surpassed the evaluation task group for source memory. No significant correlation between the situational understanding and the source memory was found for the summarization group, whereas a significant positive correlation was found for the evaluation group. The results are discussed in terms of the documents model framework.

摘要

本研究考察了阅读任务对整合来自多篇文本的内容和来源信息的影响。本科生(N = 102)在摘要任务条件或评价任务条件下阅读了五篇关于虚构事件的报纸文章。然后,他们进行了一项整合测试和一项来源选择测试,这两项测试评估了他们对文本中描述的情况的理解以及对文本信息来源的记忆。结果表明,摘要任务组和评价任务组在情境理解方面没有显著差异。然而,摘要任务组在来源记忆方面显著超过了评价任务组。摘要组的情境理解和来源记忆之间未发现显著相关性,而评价组则发现了显著的正相关。研究结果依据文献模型框架进行了讨论。

相似文献

1
[The effect of reading tasks on learning from multiple texts].[阅读任务对从多篇文本中学习的影响]
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2014 Jun;85(2):203-9. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.85.13309.
2
Easy-to-read texts for students with intellectual disability: linguistic factors affecting comprehension.智障学生易懂的文本:影响理解的语言因素。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2014 May;27(3):212-25. doi: 10.1111/jar.12065. Epub 2013 Jul 1.
3
The effects of summarization and factual retrieval practice on text comprehension and text retention in elementary education.总结和事实检索练习对基础教育中文本理解和文本保持的影响。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2024 Jun;30(2):258-267. doi: 10.1037/xap0000507. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
4
Source credibility and the processing of refutation texts.来源可信度与反驳性文本的处理
Mem Cognit. 2017 Jan;45(1):168-181. doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0649-0.
5
Processing and memory of information presented in narrative or expository texts.叙述性或说明性文本中信息的处理和记忆。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2010 Sep;80(Pt 3):341-62. doi: 10.1348/000709910X485700. Epub 2010 Feb 2.
6
From simple agents to information sources: Readers' differential processing of story characters as a function of story consistency.从简单的代理到信息源:读者对故事角色的差异处理作为故事一致性的函数。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2021 Jan;212:103191. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103191. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
7
[The effect of working memory on learning from texts].[工作记忆对文本学习的影响]
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2011 Aug;82(3):223-30. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.82.223.
8
[Effects of signals on memory and comprehension of history text: insertion of signals that relate the main text with corresponding information in the margins].信号对历史文本记忆与理解的影响:插入将正文与页边相应信息联系起来的信号
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2001 Aug;72(3):227-33. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.72.227.
9
Questioning and reading goals: information-seeking questions asked on scientific texts read under different task conditions.质疑和阅读目标:在不同任务条件下阅读科学文本时提出的信息寻求问题。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2013 Sep;83(Pt 3):502-20. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02079.x. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
10
Learning from texts: activation of information from previous texts during reading.从文本中学习:阅读过程中激活先前文本中的信息。
Read Writ. 2016;29:1161-1178. doi: 10.1007/s11145-016-9630-3. Epub 2016 Feb 3.