Hamdi Amir, Mawad Raya, Bassett Roland, di Stasi Antonio, Ferro Roberto, Afrough Aimaz, Ram Ron, Dabaja Bouthaina, Rondon Gabriela, Champlin Richard, Sandmaier Brenda M, Doney Kristine, Bar Merav, Kebriaei Partow
Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Division of Clinical Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014 Nov;20(11):1767-71. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2014.07.005. Epub 2014 Jul 10.
Central nervous system (CNS) relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) confers a poor prognosis in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Preventing CNS relapse after HSCT remains a therapeutic challenge, and criteria for post-HSCT CNS prophylaxis have not been addressed. In a 3-center retrospective analysis, we reviewed the data for 457 adult patients with ALL who received a first allogeneic HSCT in first or second complete remission (CR). All patients received CNS prophylaxis as part of their upfront therapy for ALL, but post-transplantation CNS prophylaxis practice varied by institution and was administered to 48% of the patients. Eighteen patients (4%) developed CNS relapse after HSCT (isolated CNS relapse, n = 8; combined bone marrow and CNS relapse, n = 10). Patients with a previous history of CNS involvement with leukemia had a significantly higher rate for CNS relapse (P = .002), and pretransplantation CNS involvement was the only risk factor for post-transplantation CNS relapse found in this study. We failed to find a significant effect of post-transplantation CNS prophylaxis to prevent relapse after transplantation. Furthermore, no benefit for post-transplantation CNS prophylaxis could be detected when a subgroup analysis of patients with (P = .10) and without previous CNS involvement (P = .52) was performed. Finally, we could not find any significant effect for intensity of the transplantation conditioning regimen on CNS relapse after HSCT. In conclusion, CNS relapse is an uncommon event after HSCT for patients with ALL in CR1 or CR2, but with higher risk among patients with CNS involvement before transplantation. Furthermore, neither the use of post-HSCT CNS prophylaxis nor the intensity of the HSCT conditioning regimen made a significant difference in the rate of post-HSCT CNS relapse.
异基因造血干细胞移植(HSCT)后中枢神经系统(CNS)复发会使成年急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)患者的预后变差。预防HSCT后的CNS复发仍然是一项治疗挑战,且HSCT后CNS预防的标准尚未得到解决。在一项三中心回顾性分析中,我们回顾了457例在首次或第二次完全缓解(CR)时接受首次异基因HSCT的成年ALL患者的数据。所有患者均接受CNS预防作为其ALL初始治疗的一部分,但移植后CNS预防措施因机构而异,48%的患者接受了该预防措施。18例患者(4%)在HSCT后发生CNS复发(孤立性CNS复发,n = 8;骨髓和CNS联合复发,n = 10)。既往有白血病CNS受累病史的患者CNS复发率显著更高(P = .002),且移植前CNS受累是本研究中发现的移植后CNS复发的唯一危险因素。我们未发现移植后CNS预防对预防移植后复发有显著效果。此外,在对有(P = .10)和无既往CNS受累(P = .52)的患者进行亚组分析时,未检测到移植后CNS预防的益处。最后,我们未发现移植预处理方案强度对HSCT后CNS复发有任何显著影响。总之,对于处于CR1或CR2的ALL患者,HSCT后CNS复发是一种不常见的事件,但移植前有CNS受累的患者风险更高。此外,HSCT后CNS预防的使用或HSCT预处理方案的强度对HSCT后CNS复发率均无显著差异。