Suppr超能文献

同胞全相合与亲缘单倍体相合移植治疗急性淋巴细胞白血病中枢神经系统复发结局的比较。

Comparison of central nervous system relapse outcomes following haploidentical vs identical-sibling transplant for acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

机构信息

Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.

Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Ann Hematol. 2020 Jul;99(7):1643-1653. doi: 10.1007/s00277-020-04080-9. Epub 2020 May 26.

Abstract

To explore the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of central nervous system (CNS) relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and to compare the differences in CNS relapse between haploidentical donor HSCT (HID-HSCT) and HLA-identical sibling donor HSCT (ISD-HSCT). We performed a retrospective nested case-control study on patients with CNS relapse after allo-HSCT. The cumulative incidence of CNS relapse was 4.06% after allo-HSCT in ALL, with a significantly poor prognosis. The incidence was 3.91% and 5.36% in HID-HSCT and ISD-HSCT, respectively (p = .227). Among the patients with CNS relapse, the overall survival (OS) at 3 years was 56.2 ± 6.8% in the HID-HSCT subgroup and 76.9 ± 10.2% in the ISD-HSCT subgroup (p = .176). The 3-year cumulative incidence of systemic relapse was also comparable between the two subgroups (HID-HSCT, 40.6 ± 7.4%; ISD-HSCT, 13.3 ± 8.7%, respectively, p = .085). Younger age (p = .045), T-ALL (p = .035), hyperleukocytosis at diagnosis (p < .001), advanced disease stage at transplant (p < .001), pre-HSCT CNS involvement (p < .001), and absence of chronic graft vs host disease (cGVHD) (p < .001) were independent risk factors for CNS relapse after allo-HSCT. In conclusion, CNS relapse was a significant complication after allo-HSCT in ALL and was associated with poor prognosis. The incidences and outcomes were comparable between HID-HSCT and ISD-HSCT.

摘要

探讨异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT)治疗急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)后中枢神经系统(CNS)复发的发生率、危险因素和结局,并比较单倍体相合供者 HSCT(HID-HSCT)和 HLA 相合同胞供者 HSCT(ISD-HSCT)之间 CNS 复发的差异。我们对 allo-HSCT 后 CNS 复发的患者进行了回顾性巢式病例对照研究。ALL 患者 allo-HSCT 后 CNS 复发的累积发生率为 4.06%,预后较差。HID-HSCT 和 ISD-HSCT 组的发生率分别为 3.91%和 5.36%(p=0.227)。在 CNS 复发的患者中,HID-HSCT 亚组的 3 年总生存率(OS)为 56.2±6.8%,ISD-HSCT 亚组为 76.9±10.2%(p=0.176)。两组的系统性复发 3 年累积发生率也相当(HID-HSCT,40.6±7.4%;ISD-HSCT,13.3±8.7%,分别,p=0.085)。年龄较小(p=0.045)、T-ALL(p=0.035)、诊断时白细胞增多(p<0.001)、移植时疾病分期较晚(p<0.001)、预 HSCT CNS 受累(p<0.001)和无慢性移植物抗宿主病(cGVHD)(p<0.001)是 allo-HSCT 后 CNS 复发的独立危险因素。总之,CNS 复发是 ALL 患者 allo-HSCT 后的一个严重并发症,与预后不良相关。HID-HSCT 和 ISD-HSCT 之间的发生率和结局相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验