• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

种植体支抗远中移动矫治器与传统牙齿支抗远中移动矫治器在上颌磨牙远中移动效果的比较

Comparison of maxillary molar distalization with an implant-supported distal jet and a traditional tooth-supported distal jet appliance.

作者信息

Cozzani Mauro, Pasini Marco, Zallio Francesco, Ritucci Robert, Mutinelli Sabrina, Mazzotta Laura, Giuca Maria Rita, Piras Vincenzo

机构信息

Scientific Committee UOC Odontoiatria "G. Gaslini-Galliera" Hospital, Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche, Università di Cagliari, Via Binaghi 4, 09121 Cagliari, Italy.

Università di Pisa, Lungarno Pacinotti 43, 56126 Pisa, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Dent. 2014;2014:937059. doi: 10.1155/2014/937059. Epub 2014 Jun 11.

DOI:10.1155/2014/937059
PMID:25018770
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4075073/
Abstract

Aim. To investigate and compare the efficiency of two appliances for molar distalization: the bone-anchored distal screw (DS) and the traditional tooth-supported distal jet (DJ) for molar distalization and anchorage loss. Methods. Tests (18 subjects) were treated with a DS and controls (18 subjects) were treated with a DJ. Lateral cephalograms were obtained before and at the end of molar distalization and were analysed. Shapiro Wilk test, unpaired t-test, and Wilcoxon rank-sum test were applied according to values distribution. The α level was fixed at 0.05. Results. Maxillary first molars were successfully distalized into a Class I relationship in all patients. The mean molar distalization and treatment time were similar in both groups. The DS group exhibited a spontaneous distalization (2.1 ± 0.9 mm) of the first premolar with control of anchorage loss, distal tipping, extrusion, and skeletal changes. Conclusions. The DS is an adequate compliance-free distalizing appliance that can be used safely for the correction of Class II malocclusions. In comparison to the traditional DJ, the DS enables not only a good rate of molar distalization, but also a spontaneous distalization of the first premolars.

摘要

目的。研究并比较两种用于磨牙远移的矫治器的效率:骨锚式远移螺钉(DS)和传统的牙齿支持式远移矫治器(DJ)在磨牙远移和支抗丧失方面的情况。方法。试验组(18名受试者)使用DS进行治疗,对照组(18名受试者)使用DJ进行治疗。在磨牙远移开始前和结束时获取头颅侧位片并进行分析。根据数值分布应用夏皮罗 - 威尔克检验、非配对t检验和威尔科克森秩和检验。α水平设定为0.05。结果。所有患者的上颌第一磨牙均成功远移至I类关系。两组的平均磨牙远移量和治疗时间相似。DS组第一前磨牙出现自发远移(2.1±0.9毫米),同时支抗丧失、远中倾斜、伸长及骨骼变化得到控制。结论。DS是一种无需患者配合的合适远移矫治器,可安全用于矫治II类错牙合畸形。与传统的DJ相比,DS不仅能实现良好的磨牙远移率,还能使第一前磨牙自发远移。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5e/4075073/0753964587d2/IJD2014-937059.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5e/4075073/0aca68635a47/IJD2014-937059.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5e/4075073/b311acfa2dcb/IJD2014-937059.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5e/4075073/41f7d813f3b3/IJD2014-937059.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5e/4075073/7172f5d7f212/IJD2014-937059.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5e/4075073/d982b2043482/IJD2014-937059.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5e/4075073/0753964587d2/IJD2014-937059.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5e/4075073/0aca68635a47/IJD2014-937059.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5e/4075073/b311acfa2dcb/IJD2014-937059.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5e/4075073/41f7d813f3b3/IJD2014-937059.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5e/4075073/7172f5d7f212/IJD2014-937059.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5e/4075073/d982b2043482/IJD2014-937059.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5e/4075073/0753964587d2/IJD2014-937059.006.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of maxillary molar distalization with an implant-supported distal jet and a traditional tooth-supported distal jet appliance.种植体支抗远中移动矫治器与传统牙齿支抗远中移动矫治器在上颌磨牙远中移动效果的比较
Int J Dent. 2014;2014:937059. doi: 10.1155/2014/937059. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
2
Evaluation of maxillary molar distalization with the distal jet: a comparison with other contemporary methods.使用远中喷射器对上颌磨牙远移的评估:与其他当代方法的比较。
Angle Orthod. 2002 Oct;72(5):481-94. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2002)072<0481:EOMMDW>2.0.CO;2.
3
Comparative evaluation of molar distalization therapy using pendulum and distal screw appliances.使用摆锤式矫治器和远中螺钉矫治器进行磨牙远移治疗的比较评估。
Korean J Orthod. 2015 Jul;45(4):171-9. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2015.45.4.171. Epub 2015 Jul 24.
4
A comparison of two intraoral molar distalization appliances: distal jet versus pendulum.两种口腔内磨牙远移矫治器的比较:远中喷射器与摆式矫治器。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Sep;128(3):353-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.04.031.
5
Comparing Distal-Jet with Dental Anchorage to Distal-Jet with Skeletal Anchorage: A Prospective Parallel Cohort Study.比较带牙支抗的远中喷射器与带骨支抗的远中喷射器:一项前瞻性平行队列研究。
Dent J (Basel). 2022 Sep 27;10(10):179. doi: 10.3390/dj10100179.
6
Comparison between direct vs indirect anchorage in two miniscrew-supported distalizing devices.两种微螺钉支持的远中移动装置中直接锚固与间接锚固的比较。
Angle Orthod. 2016 May;86(3):399-406. doi: 10.2319/040715-231.1. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
7
A comparison of two maxillary molar distalizing appliances with the distal jet.两种上颌磨牙远移矫治器与远中喷射器的比较。
World J Orthod. 2005 Winter;6(4):382-90.
8
Miniscrew-supported distal jet versus conventional distal jet appliance: A pilot study.微螺钉支持的远中喷射器与传统远中喷射矫治器:一项初步研究。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2019 Jul 1;11(7):e650-e658. doi: 10.4317/jced.55780. eCollection 2019 Jul.
9
The effectiveness of pendulum, K-loop, and distal jet distalization techniques in growing children and its effects on anchor unit: A comparative study.钟摆式、K环和远中喷射远中移动技术在儿童生长发育中的有效性及其对支抗单位的影响:一项比较研究。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2016 Oct-Dec;34(4):331-40. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.191411.
10
Comparative evaluation of molar distalization therapy with erupted second molar: Segmented versus Quad Pendulum appliance.已萌出第二磨牙情况下磨牙远移治疗的比较评估:片段弓矫治器与四眼簧矫治器对比
Prog Orthod. 2014;15(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s40510-014-0049-6. Epub 2014 Aug 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of total treatment duration with hybrid pendulum and buccal interradicular miniscrew supported maxillary molar distalization mechanics: a retrospective study.混合摆式与颊侧根间微型螺钉支持的上颌磨牙远移力学的总治疗时间比较:一项回顾性研究
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Aug 21;25(1):1348. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06714-8.
2
Effectiveness of Clear Aligner Therapy in Maxillary Molar Distalization for Class II Malocclusion: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies.透明矫治器治疗Ⅱ类错牙合畸形上颌磨牙远移的有效性:临床研究的系统评价
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2025 Jun 30;15(3):222-233. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_59_24. eCollection 2025 May-Jun.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Soft tissue, skeletal and dentoalveolar changes following conventional anchorage molar distalization therapy in class II non-growing subjects: a multicentric retrospective study.传统支抗磨牙远移治疗在生长发育中 II 类非患者中的软组织、骨骼和牙牙槽变化:一项多中心回顾性研究。
Prog Orthod. 2012 May;13(1):30-41. doi: 10.1016/j.pio.2011.07.002. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
2
Efficiency of the distal screw in the distal movement of maxillary molars.远中螺钉在上颌磨牙远中移动中的效率。
World J Orthod. 2010 Winter;11(4):341-5.
3
Midpalatal miniscrews for orthodontic anchorage: factors affecting clinical success.
Long-term stability of maxillary molar distalization in the treatment of Angle Class II malocclusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
安氏II类错牙合畸形治疗中上颌磨牙远移的长期稳定性:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Apr 29;29(5):277. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06339-9.
4
Balancing the Load: How Optimal Forces Shape the Longevity and Stability of Orthodontic Mini-Implants.平衡负荷:最佳力如何塑造正畸微型种植体的寿命和稳定性。
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Feb 5;13(2):71. doi: 10.3390/dj13020071.
5
The efficiency of a customized distalizer with Variety SP® screws anchored on palatal miniscrews for upper molar distalization.带 Variety SP® 螺钉的个性化远移器在上颌磨牙远移中锚定在腭侧微种植体上的效率。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2024 Jun 10;29(2):e2423253. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.29.2.e2423253.oar. eCollection 2024.
6
Molar distalization in orthodontics: a bibliometric analysis.正畸中的磨牙远移:文献计量分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Jan 30;28(2):123. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05520-w.
7
Effectiveness of miniscrew-supported maxillary molar distalization according to temporary anchorage device features and appliance design: systematic review and meta-analysis.微型种植体支抗上颌磨牙远移效果的评估:基于临时支抗装置特征和矫治器设计的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Angle Orthod. 2024 Jan 1;94(1):107-121. doi: 10.2319/052223-364.1.
8
Comparing Distal-Jet with Dental Anchorage to Distal-Jet with Skeletal Anchorage: A Prospective Parallel Cohort Study.比较带牙支抗的远中喷射器与带骨支抗的远中喷射器:一项前瞻性平行队列研究。
Dent J (Basel). 2022 Sep 27;10(10):179. doi: 10.3390/dj10100179.
9
Torque control of maxillary anterior teeth with the double J retractor and palatal miniscrews during en masse retraction.双 J 拉钩和腭部微型种植体在整体内收中控制上颌前牙转矩。
Angle Orthod. 2022 Jul 1;92(4):562-572. doi: 10.2319/092621-725.1.
10
Sagittal, rotational and transverse changes with three intraoral distalization force systems: Jones jig, distal jet and first class.三种口内远中移动力系统(琼斯矫治器、远中喷射器和一类矫治器)导致的矢状向、旋转和横向变化
J Clin Exp Dent. 2021 May 1;13(5):e455-e462. doi: 10.4317/jced.57993. eCollection 2021 May.
腭中微型种植钉作为正畸支抗:影响临床成功率的因素。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Jan;137(1):66-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.11.036.
4
Optimal palatal configuration for miniscrew applications.种植钉应用的最佳腭部形态。
Angle Orthod. 2010 Jan;80(1):145-52. doi: 10.2319/122908-662.1.
5
Efficiency of a skeletonized distal jet appliance supported by miniscrew anchorage for noncompliance maxillary molar distalization.微螺钉支抗支持的非依从性上颌磨牙远移的骨皮质远端喷射矫治器的效能
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Oct;136(4):578-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.10.049.
6
Maxillary molar distalization with the dual-force distalizer supported by mini-implants: a clinical study.使用微型种植体支持的双力远移器进行上颌磨牙远移:一项临床研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Mar;135(3):282.e1-5; discussion 282-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.11.018.
7
Numerical/experimental analysis of the stress field around miniscrews for orthodontic anchorage.正畸支抗微螺钉周围应力场的数值/实验分析
Eur J Orthod. 2009 Feb;31(1):12-20. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn066. Epub 2008 Dec 15.
8
Treatment effects of intraoral appliances with conventional anchorage designs for non-compliance maxillary molar distalization: a literature review.传统支抗设计的口腔矫治器用于非依从性上颌磨牙远移的治疗效果:一项文献综述
Eur J Orthod. 2008 Dec;30(6):558-71. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn047. Epub 2008 Sep 27.
9
Quantitative cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of palatal bone thickness for orthodontic miniscrew placement.正畸微螺钉植入腭骨厚度的锥形束计算机断层扫描定量评估。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Sep;134(3):361-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.01.027.
10
Pendulum appliances with 2 anchorage designs: conventional anchorage vs bone anchorage.具有两种锚固设计的摆式矫治器:传统锚固与骨锚固
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Mar;133(3):339.e9-339.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.10.002.