Xie Zhuojun, Xu Hao, Tian Ye, Han Xianglong
State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Department of Orthodontics, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Apr 29;29(5):277. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06339-9.
This study aimed to evaluate the long-term skeletal and dental stability following maxillary molar distalization for Angle Class II malocclusion and to explore potential relapse-related factors.
A systematic search of twelve electronic databases and six manual sources was conducted. After data extraction and risk of bias assessment, meta-analyses using random-effects models were performed. Heterogeneity was explored through subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses. The certainty of evidence was rated using the GRADE approach.
9 non-randomized clinical trials involving 223 Class II malocclusion patients were included. Meta-analyses of 5 skeletal and 9 dental treatment effects were conducted. While skeletal changes were minimal and not statistically significant, significant mesial relapse of the first molar (1.80 mm, p = 0.002, I = 90%) and the second molar (3.19 mm, p = 0.007, I = 93%) was observed. Besides, the first molar showed notable extrusion (1.18 mm, p = 0.002, I = 85%) and mesial inclination (1.46°, p = 0.004, I = 18%). Subgroup analyses identified a significant age-related effect on vertical changes of the first molar, with greater extrusion in younger patients (≤ 18 years). The certainty of evidence was rated low to very low.
Over a mean follow-up of 4.2 years, skeletal changes were minimal, while maxillary molars showed significant mesial relapse. The first molar also exhibited measurable extrusion and mesial inclination, with younger patients showing greater vertical changes. However, these findings were based on low to very low certainty of evidence due to non-randomized study designs and high heterogeneity, warranting cautious interpretation and further validation.
Identifying long-term relapse patterns and patient-related factors after maxillary molar distalization can help orthodontists optimize treatment planning, select appropriate cases, and develop individualized retention strategies to improve long-term stability.
本研究旨在评估安氏II类错牙合畸形上颌磨牙远移后的长期骨骼和牙齿稳定性,并探索潜在的复发相关因素。
对12个电子数据库和6个手工检索来源进行系统检索。在数据提取和偏倚风险评估后,采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。通过亚组分析和敏感性分析探讨异质性。使用GRADE方法对证据的确定性进行评级。
纳入了9项涉及223例II类错牙合畸形患者的非随机临床试验。对5项骨骼和9项牙齿治疗效果进行了荟萃分析。虽然骨骼变化很小且无统计学意义,但观察到第一磨牙有明显的近中复发(1.80mm,p = 0.002,I = 90%)和第二磨牙(3.19mm,p = 0.007,I = 93%)。此外,第一磨牙显示出明显的伸长(1.18mm,p = 0.002,I = 85%)和近中倾斜(1.46°,p = 0.004,I = 18%)。亚组分析确定年龄对第一磨牙垂直变化有显著影响,年轻患者(≤18岁)伸长更明显。证据的确定性被评为低到极低。
在平均4.2年的随访中,骨骼变化很小,而上颌磨牙显示出明显的近中复发。第一磨牙还表现出可测量的伸长和近中倾斜,年轻患者的垂直变化更大。然而,由于非随机研究设计和高异质性,这些发现基于低到极低的证据确定性,需要谨慎解释并进一步验证。
识别上颌磨牙远移后的长期复发模式和患者相关因素有助于正畸医生优化治疗计划,选择合适的病例,并制定个性化的保持策略,以提高长期稳定性。