Wichmann Julian L, Majenka Pawel, Beeres Martin, Kromen Wolfgang, Schulz Boris, Wesarg Stefan, Bauer Ralf W, Kerl J Matthias, Gruber-Rouh Tatjana, Hammerstingl Renate, Vogl Thomas J, Lehnert Thomas
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany,
Eur Radiol. 2014 Nov;24(11):2927-35. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3300-0. Epub 2014 Jul 17.
To intra-individually compare single-portal-phase low-tube-voltage (100-kVp) computed tomography (CT) with 120-kVp images for short-term follow-up assessment of CT severity index (CTSI) of acute pancreatitis, interobserver agreement and radiation dose.
We retrospectively analysed 66 patients with acute pancreatitis who underwent initial dual-contrast-phase CT (unenhanced, arterial, portal phase) at admission and short-term (mean interval 11.4 days) follow-up dual-contrast-phase dual-energy CT. The 100-kVp and linearly blended images representing 120-kVp acquisition follow-up CT images were independently evaluated by three radiologists using a modified CTSI assessing pancreatic inflammation, necrosis and extrapancreatic complications. Scores were compared with paired t test and interobserver agreement was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).
Mean CTSI scores on unenhanced, portal- and dual-contrast-phase images were 4.9, 6.1 and 6.2 (120 kVp) and 5.0, 6.0 and 6.1 (100 kVp), respectively. Contrast-enhanced series showed a higher CTSI compared to unenhanced images (P < 0.05) but no significant differences between single- and dual-contrast-phase series (P > 0.7). CTSI scores were comparable for 100-kVp and 120-kVp images (P > 0.05). Interobserver agreement was substantial for all evaluated series and subcategories (ICC 0.67-0.93). DLP of single-portal-phase 100-kVp images was reduced by 41 % compared to 120-kVp images (363.8 versus 615.9 mGy cm).
Low-tube-voltage single-phase 100-kVp CT provides sufficient information for follow-up evaluation of acute pancreatitis and significantly reduces radiation exposure.
• Single-portal-phase CT provides sufficient evaluation for follow-up of acute pancreatitis. • Follow-up CT does not benefit from unenhanced or arterial-phase acquisition. • CT severity index scores are equal for dual-contrast-phase 100-/120-kVp acquisition (P > 0.05). • 100-kVp single-portal-phase follow-up CT of acute pancreatitis significantly reduces radiation exposure.
对急性胰腺炎患者进行个体内比较,采用单期门静脉期低管电压(100 kVp)计算机断层扫描(CT)与120 kVp图像,以评估急性胰腺炎的CT严重程度指数(CTSI)、观察者间一致性及辐射剂量。
我们回顾性分析了66例急性胰腺炎患者,这些患者在入院时接受了初始双期对比增强CT(平扫、动脉期、门静脉期)检查,并在短期内(平均间隔11.4天)进行了双期对比增强双能量CT随访。三位放射科医生使用改良的CTSI独立评估代表120 kVp采集的100 kVp和线性混合图像,以评估胰腺炎症、坏死和胰腺外并发症。采用配对t检验比较评分,并使用组内相关系数(ICC)评估观察者间一致性。
平扫、门静脉期和双期对比增强图像的平均CTSI评分分别为4.9、6.1和6.2(120 kVp)以及5.0、6.0和6.1(100 kVp)。与平扫图像相比,对比增强系列显示CTSI更高(P < 0.05),但单期和双期对比增强系列之间无显著差异(P > 0.7)。100 kVp和120 kVp图像的CTSI评分具有可比性(P > 0.05)。所有评估系列和亚类的观察者间一致性良好(ICC 0.67 - 0.93)。与120 kVp图像相比,单期门静脉期100 kVp图像的剂量长度乘积(DLP)降低了41%(363.8对615.9 mGy cm)。
低管电压单期100 kVp CT为急性胰腺炎的随访评估提供了足够的信息,并显著降低了辐射暴露。
• 单期门静脉期CT为急性胰腺炎的随访提供了充分的评估。• 随访CT在平扫或动脉期采集并无优势。• 双期对比增强100/120 kVp采集的CT严重程度指数评分相等(P > 0.05)。• 急性胰腺炎的100 kVp单期门静脉期随访CT显著降低了辐射暴露。