Suppr超能文献

急性胰腺炎的多层螺旋CT:使用不同CT评分系统对单相与双相多层螺旋CT进行个体内比较以初步评估急性胰腺炎

MDCT of acute pancreatitis: Intraindividual comparison of single-phase versus dual-phase MDCT for initial assessment of acute pancreatitis using different CT scoring systems.

作者信息

Avanesov Maxim, Weinrich Julius M, Kraus Thomas, Derlin Thorsten, Adam Gerhard, Yamamura Jin, Karul Murat

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Radiol. 2016 Nov;85(11):2014-2022. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.09.013. Epub 2016 Sep 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the retrospective study was to evaluate the additional value of dual-phase multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) protocols over a single-phase protocol on initial MDCT in patients with acute pancreatitis using three CT-based pancreatitis severity scores with regard to radiation dose.

METHODS

In this retrospective, IRB approved study MDCT was performed in 102 consecutive patients (73 males; 55years, IQR48-64) with acute pancreatitis. Inclusion criteria were CT findings of interstitial edematous pancreatitis (IP) or necrotizing pancreatitis (NP) and a contrast-enhanced dual-phase (arterial phase and portal-venous phase) abdominal CT performed at ≥72h after onset of symptoms. The severity of pancreatic and extrapancreatic changes was independently assessed by 2 observers using 3 validated CT-based scoring systems (CTSI, mCTSI, EPIC). All scores were applied to arterial phase and portal venous phase scans and compared to score results of portal venous phase scans, assessed ≥14days after initial evaluation. For effective dose estimation, volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP) were recorded in all examinations.

RESULTS

In neither of the CT severity scores a significant difference was observed after application of a dual-phase protocol compared with a single-phase protocol (IP: CTSI: 2.7 vs. 2.5, p=0.25; mCTSI: 4.0 vs. 4.0, p=0.10; EPIC: 2.0 vs. 2.0, p=0.41; NP: CTSI: 8.0 vs. 7.0, p=0.64; mCTSI: 8.0 vs. 8.0, p=0.10; EPIC: 3.0 vs. 3.0, p=0.06). The application of a single-phase CT protocol was associated with a median effective dose reduction of 36% (mean dose reduction 31%) compared to a dual-phase CT scan.

CONCLUSIONS

An initial dual-phase abdominal CT after ≥72h after onset of symptoms of acute pancreatitis was not superior to a single-phase protocol for evaluation of the severity of pancreatic and extrapancreatic changes. However, the effective radiation dose may be reduced by 36% using a single-phase protocol.

摘要

目的

本回顾性研究的目的是,使用三种基于CT的胰腺炎严重程度评分,评估在急性胰腺炎患者的初次多排螺旋CT(MDCT)检查中,双期MDCT方案相对于单期方案的附加价值,并考虑辐射剂量。

方法

在这项经机构审查委员会(IRB)批准的回顾性研究中,对102例连续的急性胰腺炎患者(73例男性;年龄55岁,四分位间距48 - 64岁)进行了MDCT检查。纳入标准为间质水肿性胰腺炎(IP)或坏死性胰腺炎(NP)的CT表现,以及在症状发作后≥72小时进行的对比增强双期(动脉期和门静脉期)腹部CT检查。胰腺和胰腺外改变的严重程度由2名观察者使用3种经过验证的基于CT的评分系统(CTSI、mCTSI、EPIC)独立评估。所有评分均应用于动脉期和门静脉期扫描,并与初次评估后≥14天评估的门静脉期扫描的评分结果进行比较。为了估计有效剂量,在所有检查中记录了容积CT剂量指数(CTDIvol)和剂量长度乘积(DLP)。

结果

与单期方案相比,应用双期方案后,在任何一种CT严重程度评分中均未观察到显著差异(IP:CTSI:2.7对2.5,p = 0.25;mCTSI:4.0对4.0,p = 0.10;EPIC:2.0对2.0,p = 0.41;NP:CTSI:8.0对7.0,p = 0.64;mCTSI:8.0对8.0,p = 0.10;EPIC:3.0对3.0,p = 0.06)。与双期CT扫描相比,应用单期CT方案的中位有效剂量降低了36%(平均剂量降低31%)。

结论

在急性胰腺炎症状发作后≥72小时进行的初次双期腹部CT,在评估胰腺和胰腺外改变的严重程度方面并不优于单期方案。然而,使用单期方案可使有效辐射剂量降低36%。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验