Avanesov Maxim, Weinrich Julius M, Kraus Thomas, Derlin Thorsten, Adam Gerhard, Yamamura Jin, Karul Murat
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Eur J Radiol. 2016 Nov;85(11):2014-2022. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.09.013. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
The purpose of the retrospective study was to evaluate the additional value of dual-phase multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) protocols over a single-phase protocol on initial MDCT in patients with acute pancreatitis using three CT-based pancreatitis severity scores with regard to radiation dose.
In this retrospective, IRB approved study MDCT was performed in 102 consecutive patients (73 males; 55years, IQR48-64) with acute pancreatitis. Inclusion criteria were CT findings of interstitial edematous pancreatitis (IP) or necrotizing pancreatitis (NP) and a contrast-enhanced dual-phase (arterial phase and portal-venous phase) abdominal CT performed at ≥72h after onset of symptoms. The severity of pancreatic and extrapancreatic changes was independently assessed by 2 observers using 3 validated CT-based scoring systems (CTSI, mCTSI, EPIC). All scores were applied to arterial phase and portal venous phase scans and compared to score results of portal venous phase scans, assessed ≥14days after initial evaluation. For effective dose estimation, volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP) were recorded in all examinations.
In neither of the CT severity scores a significant difference was observed after application of a dual-phase protocol compared with a single-phase protocol (IP: CTSI: 2.7 vs. 2.5, p=0.25; mCTSI: 4.0 vs. 4.0, p=0.10; EPIC: 2.0 vs. 2.0, p=0.41; NP: CTSI: 8.0 vs. 7.0, p=0.64; mCTSI: 8.0 vs. 8.0, p=0.10; EPIC: 3.0 vs. 3.0, p=0.06). The application of a single-phase CT protocol was associated with a median effective dose reduction of 36% (mean dose reduction 31%) compared to a dual-phase CT scan.
An initial dual-phase abdominal CT after ≥72h after onset of symptoms of acute pancreatitis was not superior to a single-phase protocol for evaluation of the severity of pancreatic and extrapancreatic changes. However, the effective radiation dose may be reduced by 36% using a single-phase protocol.
本回顾性研究的目的是,使用三种基于CT的胰腺炎严重程度评分,评估在急性胰腺炎患者的初次多排螺旋CT(MDCT)检查中,双期MDCT方案相对于单期方案的附加价值,并考虑辐射剂量。
在这项经机构审查委员会(IRB)批准的回顾性研究中,对102例连续的急性胰腺炎患者(73例男性;年龄55岁,四分位间距48 - 64岁)进行了MDCT检查。纳入标准为间质水肿性胰腺炎(IP)或坏死性胰腺炎(NP)的CT表现,以及在症状发作后≥72小时进行的对比增强双期(动脉期和门静脉期)腹部CT检查。胰腺和胰腺外改变的严重程度由2名观察者使用3种经过验证的基于CT的评分系统(CTSI、mCTSI、EPIC)独立评估。所有评分均应用于动脉期和门静脉期扫描,并与初次评估后≥14天评估的门静脉期扫描的评分结果进行比较。为了估计有效剂量,在所有检查中记录了容积CT剂量指数(CTDIvol)和剂量长度乘积(DLP)。
与单期方案相比,应用双期方案后,在任何一种CT严重程度评分中均未观察到显著差异(IP:CTSI:2.7对2.5,p = 0.25;mCTSI:4.0对4.0,p = 0.10;EPIC:2.0对2.0,p = 0.41;NP:CTSI:8.0对7.0,p = 0.64;mCTSI:8.0对8.0,p = 0.10;EPIC:3.0对3.0,p = 0.06)。与双期CT扫描相比,应用单期CT方案的中位有效剂量降低了36%(平均剂量降低31%)。
在急性胰腺炎症状发作后≥72小时进行的初次双期腹部CT,在评估胰腺和胰腺外改变的严重程度方面并不优于单期方案。然而,使用单期方案可使有效辐射剂量降低36%。