• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

思考思考的伦理要求——诊断、元认知与医学职业精神。

The ethical imperative to think about thinking - diagnostics, metacognition, and medical professionalism.

作者信息

Stark Meredith, Fins Joseph J

出版信息

Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2014 Oct;23(4):386-96. doi: 10.1017/S0963180114000061. Epub 2014 Jul 17.

DOI:10.1017/S0963180114000061
PMID:25033249
Abstract

While the medical ethics literature has well explored the harm to patients, families, and the integrity of the profession in failing to disclose medical errors once they occur, less often addressed are the moral and professional obligations to take all available steps to prevent errors and harm in the first instance. As an expanding body of scholarship further elucidates the causes of medical error, including the considerable extent to which medical errors, particularly in diagnostics, may be attributable to cognitive sources, insufficient progress in systematically evaluating and implementing suggested strategies for improving critical thinking skills and medical judgment is of mounting concern. Continued failure to address pervasive thinking errors in medical decisionmaking imperils patient safety and professionalism, as well as beneficence and nonmaleficence, fairness and justice. We maintain that self-reflective and metacognitive refinement of critical thinking should not be construed as optional but rather should be considered an integral part of medical education, a codified tenet of professionalism, and by extension, a moral and professional duty.

摘要

虽然医学伦理文献已经充分探讨了医疗失误发生后对患者、家属以及行业诚信造成的危害,但较少涉及的是首先采取一切可行措施预防失误和伤害的道德与职业义务。随着越来越多的学术研究进一步阐明医疗失误的成因,包括在很大程度上医疗失误(尤其是诊断方面的失误)可能归因于认知因素,在系统评估和实施提高批判性思维技能及医学判断力的建议策略方面缺乏足够进展,这一问题日益受到关注。在医疗决策中持续未能解决普遍存在的思维错误,危及患者安全和职业素养,以及行善和不伤害原则、公平和正义。我们认为,对批判性思维进行自我反思和元认知的完善不应被视为可有可无,而应被视为医学教育的一个组成部分、职业精神的一项编纂原则,进而也是一项道德和职业责任。

相似文献

1
The ethical imperative to think about thinking - diagnostics, metacognition, and medical professionalism.思考思考的伦理要求——诊断、元认知与医学职业精神。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2014 Oct;23(4):386-96. doi: 10.1017/S0963180114000061. Epub 2014 Jul 17.
2
Teaching Critical Thinking: A Case for Instruction in Cognitive Biases to Reduce Diagnostic Errors and Improve Patient Safety.教授批判性思维:以认知偏差教学减少诊断错误和提高患者安全的案例。
Acad Med. 2019 Feb;94(2):187-194. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002518.
3
Conscience as clinical judgment: medical education and the virtue of prudence.作为临床判断的良知:医学教育与审慎之德
Virtual Mentor. 2013 Mar 1;15(3):202-5. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2013.15.3.medu1-1303.
4
Critical appraisal of clinical judgment: an essential dimension of clinical ethics.临床判断的批判性评估:临床伦理学的一个重要维度。
J Med Philos. 2013 Feb;38(1):1-5. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhs055.
5
Diagnostic decision-making and strategies to improve diagnosis.诊断决策制定与改善诊断的策略。
Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2013 Oct;43(9):232-41. doi: 10.1016/j.cppeds.2013.07.003.
6
A medical ethical reasoning model and its contributions to medical education.医学伦理推理模型及其对医学教育的贡献。
Med Educ. 2010 Sep;44(9):864-873. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03722.x.
7
Morality, ethics, and radiologists' responsibilities.道德、伦理与放射科医生的职责。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999 Aug;173(2):279-84. doi: 10.2214/ajr.173.2.10430119.
8
Medical ethics and ethical dilemmas.医学伦理与伦理困境。
Niger J Med. 2009 Jan-Mar;18(1):8-16.
9
[Not Available].
Praxis (Bern 1994). 2016;105(21):1261-1266. doi: 10.1024/1661-8157/a002494.
10
Antecedents and Consequences of Medical Students' Moral Decision Making during Professionalism Dilemmas.医学生在职业精神困境中道德决策的前因与后果
AMA J Ethics. 2017 Jun 1;19(6):568-577. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.6.medu1-1706.

引用本文的文献

1
The challenge of cognitive science for medical diagnosis.认知科学对医学诊断的挑战。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023 Feb 9;8(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00460-z.
2
Why Metacognition Is Not Always Helpful.
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 2;11:1537. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01537. eCollection 2020.