Miguez Gonzalo, Laborda Mario A, Miller Ralph R
Departamento de Psicologia, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Learn Behav. 2014 Dec;42(4):318-29. doi: 10.3758/s13420-014-0149-7.
Retroactive cue interference refers to situations in which a target cue X is paired with an outcome in phase 1 and a nontarget cue Z is paired with the same outcome in phase 2, with less subsequent responding to X being seen as a result of the phase 2 training. Two conditioned suppression experiments with rats were conducted to determine whether retroactive cue interference is similarly modulated by a manipulation that influences retroactive outcome interference (e.g., extinction). Both experiments used an ABC renewal-like design in which phase 1 training, phase 2 training, and testing each occurred in different contexts. Experiment 1 found that training the target association in multiple contexts without altering the number of training trials during phase 1 decreased retroactive cue interference (i.e., increased responding consistent with the target association). Experiment 2 found that training the interfering association in multiple contexts without altering the number of interference trials during phase 2 increased retroactive cue interference (i.e., decreased responding consistent with the target association). The possibility of similar mechanisms underlying cue interference and outcome interference is discussed.
在第一阶段,目标线索X与一个结果配对,而在第二阶段,非目标线索Z与相同的结果配对,由于第二阶段的训练,随后对X的反应减少。进行了两项以大鼠为对象的条件性抑制实验,以确定逆向线索干扰是否会受到影响逆向结果干扰的操作(例如消退)的类似调节。两项实验均采用了类似ABC更新的设计,其中第一阶段训练、第二阶段训练和测试分别在不同的环境中进行。实验1发现,在多个环境中训练目标关联,而不改变第一阶段的训练次数,会减少逆向线索干扰(即增加与目标关联一致的反应)。实验2发现,在多个环境中训练干扰关联,而不改变第二阶段的干扰次数,会增加逆向线索干扰(即减少与目标关联一致的反应)。文中讨论了线索干扰和结果干扰背后存在类似机制的可能性。