• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Emergency physician awareness of prehospital procedures and medications.

作者信息

Waldron Rachel, Sixsmith Diane M

机构信息

New York Hospital Queens, Department of Emergency Medicine, Flushing, New York.

出版信息

West J Emerg Med. 2014 Jul;15(4):504-10. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2014.2.18651.

DOI:10.5811/westjem.2014.2.18651
PMID:25035759
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4100859/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Maintaining patient safety during transition from prehospital to emergency department (ED) care depends on effective handoff communication between providers. We sought to determine emergency physicians' (EP) knowledge of the care provided by paramedics in terms of both procedures and medications, and whether the use of a verbal report improved physician accuracy.

METHODS

We conducted a 2-phase observational survey of a convenience sample of EPs in an urban, academic ED. In this large ED paramedics have no direct contact with physicians for non-critical patients, giving their report instead to the triage nurse. In Phase 1, paramedics gave verbal report to the triage nurse only. In Phase 2, a research assistant (RA) stationed in triage listened to this report and then repeated it back verbatim to the EPs caring for the patient. The RA then queried the EPs 90 minutes later regarding their patients' prehospital procedures and medications. We compared the accuracy of these 2 reporting methods.

RESULTS

There were 163 surveys completed in Phase 1 and 116 in Phase 2. The oral report had no effect on EP awareness that the patient had been brought in by ambulance (86% in Phase 1 and 85% in Phase 2.) The oral report did improve EP awareness of prehospital procedures, from 16% in Phase 1 to 45% in Phase 2, OR=4.28 (2.5-7.5). EPs were able to correctly identify all oral medications in 18% of Phase 1 cases and 47% of Phase 2 cases, and all IV medications in 42% of Phase 1 cases and 50% of Phase 2 cases. The verbal report led to a mild improvement in physician awareness of oral medications given, OR=4.0 (1.09-14.5), and no improvement in physician awareness of IV medications given, OR=1.33 (0.15-11.35). Using a composite score of procedures plus oral plus IV medications, physicians had all three categories correct in 15% of Phase 1 and 39% of Phase 2 cases (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

EPs in our ED were unaware of many prehospital procedures and medications regardless of the method used to provide this information. The addition of a verbal hand-off report resulted in a modest improvement in overall accuracy.

摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/059c/4100859/3f3f69e051ef/wjem-15-504-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/059c/4100859/b9ab8bcd11c1/wjem-15-504-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/059c/4100859/3f3f69e051ef/wjem-15-504-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/059c/4100859/b9ab8bcd11c1/wjem-15-504-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/059c/4100859/3f3f69e051ef/wjem-15-504-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Emergency physician awareness of prehospital procedures and medications.
West J Emerg Med. 2014 Jul;15(4):504-10. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2014.2.18651.
2
Improving Emergency Medicine Clinician Awareness of Prehospital-Administered Medications.提高急诊医学临床医生对院前应用药物的认识。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2024;28(3):506-512. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2023.2238815. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
3
An analysis of paramedic verbal reports to physicians in the emergency department trauma room.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2003 Apr-Jun;7(2):247-51. doi: 10.1080/10903120390936888.
4
Alternative Destination Transport? The Role of Paramedics in Optimal Use of the Emergency Department.替代性目的地转运?护理人员在急诊科优化使用中的作用。
West J Emerg Med. 2016 Nov;17(6):690-697. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2016.9.31384. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
5
Physician workload and the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale: the Predictors of Workload in the Emergency Room (POWER) Study.医生工作量与加拿大急诊科分诊及 acuity 量表:急诊室工作量预测因素(POWER)研究
CJEM. 2009 Jul;11(4):321-9. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500011350.
6
Quantitative Analysis of the Content of EMS Handoff of Critically Ill and Injured Patients to the Emergency Department.危重伤病患者急诊医疗服务交接内容的定量分析
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2017 Jan-Feb;21(1):14-17. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2016.1194930. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
7
Prospective evaluation of the MET-AP system providing triage plans for acute pediatric abdominal pain.对提供小儿急性腹痛分诊计划的MET-AP系统进行前瞻性评估。
Int J Med Inform. 2008 Mar;77(3):208-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.01.004. Epub 2007 Feb 22.
8
Videographic Assessment of the Quality of EMS to ED Handoff Communication During Pediatric Resuscitations.儿科复苏期间急诊医疗服务(EMS)与急诊科(ED)交接沟通质量的视频评估
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019 Jan-Feb;23(1):15-21. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2018.1481475. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
9
Impact of a Standardized Patient Hand-off Tool on Communication between Emergency Medical Services Personnel and Emergency Department Staff.标准化患者交接工具对紧急医疗服务人员与急诊科工作人员之间沟通的影响。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2021 Jul-Aug;25(4):530-538. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2020.1808745. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
10
The impact of prehospital instant photography of motor vehicle crashes on receiving physician perception.机动车碰撞事故的院前即时摄影对接诊医生认知的影响。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 1997 Apr-Jun;1(2):76-9. doi: 10.1080/10903129708958792.

引用本文的文献

1
Handover methods between local emergency medical services and Accident and Emergency: is there a gold standard? A scoping review.本地紧急医疗服务与急症室之间的交接方法:是否存在黄金标准?系统评价。
Acta Biomed. 2022 Aug 31;93(4):e2022288. doi: 10.23750/abm.v93i4.13515.

本文引用的文献

1
ED handoffs: observed practices and communication errors.ED 交接班:观察到的实践和沟通错误。
Am J Emerg Med. 2011 Jun;29(5):502-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2009.12.004. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
2
At-risk populations and the critically ill rely disproportionately on ambulance transport to emergency departments.高危人群和重症患者不成比例地依赖救护车将他们送往急诊部门。
Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Oct;56(4):341-7. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.04.014. Epub 2010 Jun 15.
3
Assessing clinical handover between paramedics and the trauma team.评估急救人员与创伤小组之间的临床交接情况。
Injury. 2010 May;41(5):460-4. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2009.07.065. Epub 2009 Sep 6.
4
Information loss in emergency medical services handover of trauma patients.创伤患者在紧急医疗服务交接过程中的信息丢失。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2009 Jul-Sep;13(3):280-5. doi: 10.1080/10903120802706260.
5
Handoffs causing patient harm: a survey of medical and surgical house staff.导致患者伤害的交接班:对内科和外科住院医师的一项调查
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008 Oct;34(10):563-70. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(08)34071-9.
6
Medical errors involving trainees: a study of closed malpractice claims from 5 insurers.涉及实习医生的医疗差错:对5家保险公司已结案的医疗事故索赔进行的研究
Arch Intern Med. 2007 Oct 22;167(19):2030-6. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.19.2030.
7
Retention of information by emergency department staff at ambulance handover: do standardised approaches work?急诊科工作人员在救护车交接时对信息的留存:标准化方法有效吗?
Emerg Med J. 2007 Aug;24(8):539-42. doi: 10.1136/emj.2006.045906.
8
Clinical and economic factors associated with ambulance use to the emergency department.与使用救护车前往急诊科相关的临床和经济因素。
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Aug;13(8):879-85. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.04.006. Epub 2006 Jul 6.
9
Transfers of patient care between house staff on internal medicine wards: a national survey.内科病房住院医师之间的患者护理交接:一项全国性调查。
Arch Intern Med. 2006 Jun 12;166(11):1173-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.11.1173.
10
Medicine-related problems resulting in emergency department visits.导致急诊就诊的与医学相关的问题。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2006 May;62(5):387-93. doi: 10.1007/s00228-006-0116-0. Epub 2006 Apr 8.