Coulter A, Noone A, Goldacre M
Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, University of Oxford, Oxford Regional Health Authority.
BMJ. 1989 Jul 29;299(6694):304-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6694.304.
There has been much concern about the wide variations in general practitioners' referral rates and the consequent implications for cost and quality of care. This has led to a call to evaluate the appropriateness and effectiveness of referrals. A collaborative audit of referrals to outpatient clinics was conducted by 127 general practitioners in 33 practices in the Oxford region. Records were kept of 18,754 referrals, which included data on diagnoses and reasons for referral. Overall, 6553 (35.4%) of the referrals were for particular treatments or operations and a further 6475 (34.9%) were for specific investigation or diagnosis. Advice on management was the main reason for referral in 2656 (14.3%) cases, and in 1719 (9.3%) cases the general practitioners wanted the consultants to take over managing their patients. Reassurance of either the general practitioner or the patient was recorded as the main reason in only 762 (4.1%) referrals. There seems to be scope for rationalising the referral process. A programme with three stages for evaluating referrals to outpatient clinics is recommended.
全科医生的转诊率差异很大,以及由此对医疗成本和质量产生的影响,这引发了诸多关注。这导致人们呼吁对转诊的合理性和有效性进行评估。牛津地区33家诊所的127名全科医生对门诊转诊进行了联合审计。记录了18754次转诊,其中包括诊断和转诊原因的数据。总体而言,6553次(35.4%)转诊是为了进行特定治疗或手术,另有6475次(34.9%)是为了进行特定检查或诊断。在2656例(14.3%)病例中,管理建议是转诊的主要原因,在1719例(9.3%)病例中,全科医生希望顾问接手管理他们的患者。只有762次(4.1%)转诊将全科医生或患者的安心作为主要原因。转诊流程似乎有合理化的空间。建议制定一个分三个阶段评估门诊转诊的方案。