Suppr超能文献

患者特异性的解剖学和功能参数为凸轮型股骨髋臼撞击症的发病机制提供了新的见解。

Patient-specific anatomical and functional parameters provide new insights into the pathomechanism of cam FAI.

作者信息

Ng K C Geoffrey, Lamontagne Mario, Adamczyk Andrew P, Rakhra Kawan S, Beaulé Paul E

机构信息

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Apr;473(4):1289-96. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3797-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) represents a constellation of anatomical and clinical features, but definitive diagnosis is often difficult. The high prevalence of cam deformity of the femoral head in the asymptomatic population as well as clinical factors leading to the onset of symptoms raises questions as to what other factors increase the risk of cartilage damage and hip pain.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose was to identify any differences in anatomical parameters and squat kinematics among symptomatic, asymptomatic, and control individuals and if these parameters can determine individuals at risk of developing symptoms of cam FAI.

METHODS

Forty-three participants (n = 43) were recruited and divided into three groups: symptomatic (12), asymptomatic (17), and control (14). Symptomatic participants presented a cam deformity (identified by an elevated alpha angle on CT images), pain symptoms, clinical signs, and were scheduled for surgery. The other recruited volunteers were blinded and unaware whether they had a cam deformity. After the CT data were assessed for an elevated alpha angle, participants with a cam deformity but who did not demonstrate any clinical signs or symptoms were considered asymptomatic, whereas participants without a cam deformity and without clinical signs or symptoms were considered healthy control subjects. For each participant, anatomical CT parameters (axial alpha angle, radial alpha angle, femoral head-neck offset, femoral neck-shaft angle, medial proximal femoral angle, femoral torsion, acetabular version) were evaluated. Functional squat parameters (maximal squat depth, pelvic range of motion) were determined using a motion capture system. A stepwise discriminant function analysis was used to determine which of the parameters were most suitable to classify each participant with their respective subgroup.

RESULTS

The symptomatic group showed elevated alpha angles and lower femoral neck-shaft angles, whereas the asymptomatic group showed elevated alpha angles in comparison with the control group. The best discriminating parameters to determine symptoms were radial alpha angle, femoral neck-shaft angle, and pelvic range of motion (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In the presence of a cam deformity, indications of a decreased femoral neck-shaft angle and reduced pelvic range of motion can identify those at risk of symptomatic FAI.

摘要

背景

股骨髋臼撞击症(FAI)表现为一系列解剖学和临床特征,但明确诊断往往困难。无症状人群中股骨头凸轮畸形的高患病率以及导致症状发作的临床因素引发了关于其他哪些因素会增加软骨损伤和髋关节疼痛风险的问题。

问题/目的:目的是确定有症状、无症状和对照个体在解剖学参数和深蹲运动学方面是否存在差异,以及这些参数是否能够确定有凸轮型FAI症状发生风险的个体。

方法

招募了43名参与者(n = 43),并将其分为三组:有症状组(12名)、无症状组(17名)和对照组(14名)。有症状的参与者表现出凸轮畸形(通过CT图像上增大的α角确定)、疼痛症状、临床体征,并计划进行手术。其他招募的志愿者不知情且不知道自己是否有凸轮畸形。在评估CT数据中增大的α角后,有凸轮畸形但未表现出任何临床体征或症状的参与者被视为无症状,而没有凸轮畸形且没有临床体征或症状的参与者被视为健康对照受试者。对每位参与者评估解剖学CT参数(轴向α角、径向α角、股骨头颈偏移、股骨颈干角、股骨近端内侧角、股骨扭转、髋臼旋转)。使用运动捕捉系统确定功能性深蹲参数(最大深蹲深度、骨盆活动范围)。采用逐步判别函数分析来确定哪些参数最适合将每位参与者分类到各自的亚组中。

结果

有症状组的α角升高,股骨颈干角较低,而无症状组与对照组相比α角升高。确定症状的最佳判别参数是径向α角、股骨颈干角和骨盆活动范围(p < 0.001)。

结论

在存在凸轮畸形的情况下,股骨颈干角减小和骨盆活动范围减小的迹象可识别有症状性FAI风险的个体。

相似文献

1
Patient-specific anatomical and functional parameters provide new insights into the pathomechanism of cam FAI.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Apr;473(4):1289-96. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3797-1.
2
Cam FAI and Smaller Neck Angles Increase Subchondral Bone Stresses During Squatting: A Finite Element Analysis.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 May;477(5):1053-1063. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000528.
3
Anatomic Predictors of Sagittal Hip and Pelvic Motions in Patients With a Cam Deformity.
Am J Sports Med. 2018 May;46(6):1331-1342. doi: 10.1177/0363546518755150. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
4
Femoral Morphology in the Dysplastic Hip: Three-dimensional Characterizations With CT.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Apr;475(4):1045-1054. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5119-2.
5
Increased Hip Stresses Resulting From a Cam Deformity and Decreased Femoral Neck-Shaft Angle During Level Walking.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Apr;475(4):998-1008. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5038-2.
6
Differences in anatomical parameters between the affected and unaffected hip in patients with bilateral cam-type deformities.
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2016 Mar;33:13-19. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2016.01.007. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
7
Can combining femoral and acetabular morphology parameters improve the characterization of femoroacetabular impingement?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Apr;473(4):1396-403. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4037-4.
9
Can a Computational Model Predict the Effect of Lesion Location on Cam-type Hip Impingement?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Jul 1;481(7):1432-1443. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002565. Epub 2023 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

3
MRI texture analysis of acetabular cancellous bone can discriminate between normal, cam positive, and cam-FAI hips.
Eur Radiol. 2023 Nov;33(11):8324-8332. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09748-0. Epub 2023 May 26.
4
[Progress in diagnosis and hip arthroscopic treatment of borderline developmental dysplasia of hip with Cam-type femoroacetabular impingement].
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 May 15;37(5):629-634. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202301058.
5
Femoral neck-shaft angle can predict the anterior capsular thickness in patients with femoracetabular impingement syndrome.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Jul;31(7):2716-2720. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07347-6. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
9
Muscle and Hip Contact Forces in Asymptomatic Men With Cam Morphology During Deep Squat.
Front Sports Act Living. 2021 Sep 9;3:716626. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2021.716626. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Incidence of hip pain in a prospective cohort of asymptomatic volunteers: is the cam deformity a risk factor for hip pain?
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Apr;42(4):793-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546513518417. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
3
Statistical shape modeling of cam femoroacetabular impingement.
J Orthop Res. 2013 Oct;31(10):1620-6. doi: 10.1002/jor.22389. Epub 2013 Jul 7.
4
The pathoanatomy and arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement.
Bone Joint Res. 2012 Oct 1;1(10):245-57. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.110.2000105. Print 2012 Oct.
5
Relationship between femoral anteversion and findings in hips with femoroacetabular impingement.
Orthopedics. 2013 Mar;36(3):e293-300. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20130222-17.
6
Three-dimensional quantification of femoral head shape in controls and patients with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement.
Ann Biomed Eng. 2013 Jun;41(6):1162-71. doi: 10.1007/s10439-013-0762-1. Epub 2013 Feb 15.
8
Can the alpha angle assessment of cam impingement predict acetabular cartilage delamination?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Dec;470(12):3361-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2601-3.
9
Computing Inter-Rater Reliability for Observational Data: An Overview and Tutorial.
Tutor Quant Methods Psychol. 2012;8(1):23-34. doi: 10.20982/tqmp.08.1.p023.
10
Radiographic predictors of hip pain in femoroacetabular impingement.
HSS J. 2011 Jul;7(2):115-9. doi: 10.1007/s11420-010-9192-x. Epub 2011 Jan 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验