Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital - General Campus, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada.
Department of Information Services, The Ottawa Hospital - General Campus, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada.
Eur Radiol. 2023 Nov;33(11):8324-8332. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09748-0. Epub 2023 May 26.
To compare the MRI texture profile of acetabular subchondral bone in normal, asymptomatic cam positive, and symptomatic cam-FAI hips and determine the accuracy of a machine learning model for discriminating between the three hip classes.
A case-control, retrospective study was performed including 68 subjects (19 normal, 26 asymptomatic cam, 23 symptomatic cam-FAI). Acetabular subchondral bone of unilateral hip was contoured on 1.5 T MR images. Nine first-order 3D histogram and 16 s-order texture features were evaluated using specialized texture analysis software. Between-group differences were assessed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests, and differences in proportions compared using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Gradient-boosted ensemble methods of decision trees were created and trained to discriminate between the three groups of hips, with percent accuracy calculated.
Sixty-eight subjects (median age 32 (28-40), 60 male) were evaluated. Significant differences among all three groups were identified with first-order (4 features, all p ≤ 0.002) and second-order (11 features, all p ≤ 0.002) texture analyses. First-order texture analysis could differentiate between control and cam positive hip groups (4 features, all p ≤ 0.002). Second-order texture analysis could additionally differentiate between asymptomatic cam and symptomatic cam-FAI groups (10 features, all p ≤ 0.02). Machine learning models demonstrated high classification accuracy of 79% (SD 16) for discriminating among all three groups.
Normal, asymptomatic cam positive, and cam-FAI hips can be discriminated based on their MRI texture profile of subchondral bone using descriptive statistics and machine learning algorithms.
Texture analysis can be performed on routine MR images of the hip and used to identify early changes in bone architecture, differentiating morphologically abnormal from normal hips, prior to onset of symptoms.
• MRI texture analysis is a technique for extracting quantitative data from routine MRI images. • MRI texture analysis demonstrates that there are different bone profiles between normal hips and those with femoroacetabular impingement. • Machine learning models can be used in conjunction with MRI texture analysis to accurately differentiate between normal hips and those with femoroacetabular impingement.
比较正常、无症状凸轮阳性和有症状凸轮-FAI 髋关节髋臼软骨下骨的 MRI 纹理特征,并确定机器学习模型区分这三种髋关节类别的准确性。
本病例对照、回顾性研究纳入 68 例患者(19 例正常、26 例无症状凸轮阳性、23 例有症状凸轮-FAI)。在 1.5T MRI 图像上对单侧髋关节髋臼软骨下骨进行轮廓勾画。使用专门的纹理分析软件评估 9 个一阶 3D 直方图和 16 个二阶纹理特征。使用 Kruskal-Wallis 和 Mann-Whitney U 检验评估组间差异,使用卡方和 Fisher 确切检验比较比例差异。创建并训练梯度提升决策树集成方法以区分三组髋关节,计算百分比准确率。
共评估 68 例患者(中位年龄 32(28-40)岁,60 例男性)。所有三组之间均存在显著差异,包括一阶(4 个特征,均 p≤0.002)和二阶(11 个特征,均 p≤0.002)纹理分析。一阶纹理分析可区分对照组和凸轮阳性髋关节组(4 个特征,均 p≤0.002)。二阶纹理分析还可以区分无症状凸轮和有症状凸轮-FAI 组(10 个特征,均 p≤0.02)。机器学习模型对三组的分类准确率高达 79%(SD 16)。
可以根据软骨下骨的 MRI 纹理特征,使用描述性统计和机器学习算法区分正常、无症状凸轮阳性和凸轮-FAI 髋关节。
可以在髋关节的常规 MRI 图像上进行纹理分析,并在出现症状之前使用该技术来识别骨结构的早期变化,从而区分形态异常的髋关节和正常髋关节。
MRI 纹理分析是一种从常规 MRI 图像中提取定量数据的技术。
MRI 纹理分析表明,正常髋关节和髋关节撞击症患者的骨形态不同。
机器学习模型可与 MRI 纹理分析结合使用,准确区分正常髋关节和髋关节撞击症患者。