Börekci Gülay, Aslan Gönül, Aydin Esin, Fiandaca Mark J, Stender Henrik, Lee Natuschka M, Özkul Yusuf, Emekdaş Gürol
Mersin University School of Health Sciences, Mersin, Turkey.
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2014 Jul;48(3):385-401. doi: 10.5578/mb.7876.
Rapid and accurate diagnosis of mycobacteria is very important in the prevention and effective treatment of tuberculosis which is still a serious public health problem. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) method using rRNA targeted probes allows for precise and accurate identification of mixed microorganisms from cultures and directly from clinical samples within a few hours without the need for culture methods. In this study it was aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of two different FISH methods (Oligo-FISH and PNA-FISH) with the conventional culture methods for the identification of Mycobacterium spp. grown in BACTEC MGIT™ (Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube) system. A total of 60 MGIT (BD, USA) positive, 52 MGIT negative samples and 10 different reference strains were included in the study. 16S rRNA targeted oligonucleotide probes (Myc657: Mycobacterium subdivision, Eub338: Positive control, NonEub: Negative control) were used for oligo-FISH, and 16S rRNA targeted peptide nucleotide probes (MTC: Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, NTM: Non-tuberculosis Mycobacterium, BacUni: Positive control) for PNA-FISH. Ehrlich-Ziehl-Neelsen staining (ARB) and Löwenstein-Jensen (LJ) culture methods were performed as conventional methods as well as MGIT 960 culture system. Of MGIT positive 60 samples (44 sputum, 4 tissue, 4 urine, 3 bronchoalveolar lavage, 3 CSF, 1 abscess, 1 peritoneal fluid), 29 (48.3%) were found positive for ARB and 44 (73.3%) with LJ culture methods giving a total of 59 positive results. Fifty-eight (96.6%) of those isolates were identified as MTC, and one (1.7%) as NTM by conventional methods. By using Oligo-FISH, 95% (57/60) of the isolates were identified as Mycobacterium spp., while three samples (5%) yielded negative result. By using PNA-FISH, 54 (91.5%) isolates were identified as mycobacteria, of them 53 (90%) were typed as MTC and 1 (1.7%) as NTM. Five isolates that were found positive with Oligo-FISH, but negative with PNA-FISH, yielded positive result with PNA-FISH method performed with minor modifications. It was determined that both FISH methods are more rapid (approximately 2-2.5 hours) and practical than the conventional culture methods and also PNA-FISH was more practical than Oligo-FISH. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the probes used for Oligo-FISH, were 96.6%, 100%, 100% and 96.4%, respectively. Those values for the probes used for PNA-FISH, were 91.5%, 100%, 100% and 91.4%, respectively (p< 0.0001). The compatibility of the methods was calculated with kappa statistical analysis, assigning perfect concordances between Oligo- and PNA-FISH methods, as well as between conventional and both of the FISH methods (κ: 0.964, 0.929, 0.964; p= 0.001). The coverage of oligonucleotide and PNA probes was also checked by using 16S rRNA gene sequence database retrieved from the SILVA 102. It was determined that the rates of coverage were 86.5% for Eub338, 41.7% for Myc657, 84.2% for BacUni, 76.3% for MTC (100% for only M.tuberculosis and M.bovis) and 25.8% for NTM probes. In conclusion, Oligo- and PNA-FISH methods seem to be successful for rapid and accurate identification of Mycobacterium spp. from MGIT positive cultures in routine mycobacteriology laboratories without the need for expensive methods.
快速准确地诊断分枝杆菌对于结核病的预防和有效治疗非常重要,结核病仍是一个严重的公共卫生问题。使用rRNA靶向探针的荧光原位杂交(FISH)方法能够在数小时内从培养物以及直接从临床样本中精确鉴定混合微生物,而无需培养方法。本研究旨在比较两种不同的FISH方法(寡核苷酸-FISH和肽核酸-FISH)与传统培养方法对在BACTEC MGIT™(分枝杆菌生长指示管)系统中生长的分枝杆菌属的鉴定性能。该研究共纳入60份MGIT(美国BD公司)阳性样本、52份MGIT阴性样本以及10种不同的参考菌株。寡核苷酸-FISH使用16S rRNA靶向寡核苷酸探针(Myc657:分枝杆菌亚群,Eub338:阳性对照,NonEub:阴性对照),肽核酸-FISH使用16S rRNA靶向肽核酸探针(MTC:结核分枝杆菌复合群,NTM:非结核分枝杆菌,BacUni:阳性对照)。采用埃利希-齐尔-尼尔森染色(ARB)和罗-琴(LJ)培养方法以及MGIT 960培养系统作为传统方法。在MGIT阳性的60份样本(44份痰液、4份组织、4份尿液、3份支气管肺泡灌洗、3份脑脊液、1份脓肿、1份腹腔积液)中,ARB检测出29份(48.3%)阳性,LJ培养方法检测出44份(73.3%)阳性,共计59份阳性结果。通过传统方法,这些分离株中有58份(96.6%)被鉴定为结核分枝杆菌复合群,1份(1.7%)为非结核分枝杆菌。使用寡核苷酸-FISH,95%(57/60)的分离株被鉴定为分枝杆菌属,而3份样本(5%)结果为阴性。使用肽核酸-FISH,54份(91.5%)分离株被鉴定为分枝杆菌,其中53份(90%)被分类为结核分枝杆菌复合群,1份(1.7%)为非结核分枝杆菌。5份在寡核苷酸-FISH中呈阳性但在肽核酸-FISH中呈阴性的分离株,经稍作修改的肽核酸-FISH方法检测结果为阳性。结果表明,两种FISH方法均比传统培养方法更快速(约2 - 2.5小时)且实用,并且肽核酸-FISH比寡核苷酸-FISH更实用。用于寡核苷酸-FISH的探针的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为:96.6%、100%、100%和96.4%。用于肽核酸-FISH的探针的相应值分别为91.5%、100%、100%和91.4%(p < 0.0001)。通过kappa统计分析计算方法的兼容性,确定寡核苷酸-FISH与肽核酸-FISH方法之间以及传统方法与两种FISH方法之间的一致性极佳(κ:0.�64、0.929、0.964;p = 0.001)。还使用从SILVA 102检索的16S rRNA基因序列数据库检查了寡核苷酸和肽核酸探针的覆盖范围。结果确定,Eub338的覆盖率为86.5%,Myc657为41.7%;BacUni为84.2%,MTC为76.3%(仅结核分枝杆菌和牛分枝杆菌为100%),NTM探针为25.8%。总之,寡核苷酸-FISH和肽核酸-FISH方法似乎能够成功地在常规分枝杆菌实验室中从MGIT阳性培养物中快速准确地鉴定分枝杆菌属,而无需使用昂贵的方法。