Bémer Pascale, Plouzeau Chloé, Tande Didier, Léger Julie, Giraudeau Bruno, Valentin Anne Sophie, Jolivet-Gougeon Anne, Vincent Pascal, Corvec Stéphane, Gibaud Sophie, Juvin Marie Emmanuelle, Héry-Arnaud Genevieve, Lemarié Carole, Kempf Marie, Bret Laurent, Quentin Roland, Coffre Carine, de Pinieux Gonzague, Bernard Louis, Burucoa Christophe
CHU Nantes, Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Nantes, France
CHU Poitiers, Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Poitiers, France.
J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Oct;52(10):3583-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01459-14. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
There is no standard method for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI). The contribution of 16S rRNA gene PCR sequencing on a routine basis remains to be defined. We performed a prospective multicenter study to assess the contributions of 16S rRNA gene assays in PJI diagnosis. Over a 2-year period, all patients suspected to have PJIs and a few uninfected patients undergoing primary arthroplasty (control group) were included. Five perioperative samples per patient were collected for culture and 16S rRNA gene PCR sequencing and one for histological examination. Three multicenter quality control assays were performed with both DNA extracts and crushed samples. The diagnosis of PJI was based on clinical, bacteriological, and histological criteria, according to Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines. A molecular diagnosis was modeled on the bacteriological criterion (≥ 1 positive sample for strict pathogens and ≥ 2 for commensal skin flora). Molecular data were analyzed according to the diagnosis of PJI. Between December 2010 and March 2012, 264 suspected cases of PJI and 35 control cases were included. PJI was confirmed in 215/264 suspected cases, 192 (89%) with a bacteriological criterion. The PJIs were monomicrobial (163 cases [85%]; staphylococci, n = 108; streptococci, n = 22; Gram-negative bacilli, n = 16; anaerobes, n = 13; others, n = 4) or polymicrobial (29 cases [15%]). The molecular diagnosis was positive in 151/215 confirmed cases of PJI (143 cases with bacteriological PJI documentation and 8 treated cases without bacteriological documentation) and in 2/49 cases without confirmed PJI (sensitivity, 73.3%; specificity, 95.5%). The 16S rRNA gene PCR assay showed a lack of sensitivity in the diagnosis of PJI on a multicenter routine basis.
目前尚无诊断人工关节感染(PJI)的标准方法。16S rRNA基因PCR测序在日常诊断中的作用仍有待明确。我们进行了一项前瞻性多中心研究,以评估16S rRNA基因检测在PJI诊断中的作用。在两年时间里,纳入了所有疑似患有PJI的患者以及一些接受初次关节置换术的未感染患者(对照组)。每位患者收集5份围手术期样本用于培养和16S rRNA基因PCR测序,1份用于组织学检查。对DNA提取物和粉碎样本进行了三项多中心质量控制检测。根据美国传染病学会指南,PJI的诊断基于临床、细菌学和组织学标准。分子诊断以细菌学标准为模型(严格致病菌≥1份阳性样本,共生皮肤菌群≥2份阳性样本)。根据PJI的诊断对分子数据进行分析。在2010年12月至2012年3月期间,纳入了264例疑似PJI病例和35例对照病例。264例疑似病例中有215例确诊为PJI,其中192例(89%)符合细菌学标准。PJI为单微生物感染(163例[85%];葡萄球菌,n = 108;链球菌,n = 22;革兰氏阴性杆菌,n = 16;厌氧菌,n = 13;其他,n = 4)或多微生物感染(29例[15%])。在215例确诊的PJI病例中,151例分子诊断呈阳性(143例有细菌学PJI记录,8例接受治疗但无细菌学记录),在49例未确诊PJI的病例中有2例呈阳性(敏感性为73.3%;特异性为95.5%)。16S rRNA基因PCR检测在多中心日常诊断PJI中显示出缺乏敏感性。