Benedict Catherine, Traeger Lara, Dahn Jason R, Antoni Michael, Zhou Eric S, Bustillo Natalie, Penedo Frank J
Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
J Sex Med. 2014 Oct;11(10):2571-80. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12645. Epub 2014 Jul 24.
Men with advanced prostate cancer (APC) undergoing androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) often experience distressing sexual side effects. Sexual bother is an important component of adjustment. Factors associated with increased bother are not well understood.
This study sought to describe sexual dysfunction and bother in APC patients undergoing ADT, identify socio-demographic and health/disease-related characteristics related to sexual bother, and evaluate associations between sexual bother and psychosocial well-being and quality of life (QOL).
Baseline data of a larger psychosocial intervention study was used. Pearson's correlation and independent samples t-test tested bivariate relations. Multivariate regression analysis evaluated relations between sexual bother and psychosocial and QOL outcomes.
The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite sexual function and bother subscales, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy--General, and Dyadic Adjustment Scale were the main outcome measures.
Participants (N = 80) were 70 years old (standard deviation [SD] = 9.6) and reported 18.7 months (SD = 17.3) of ADT. Sexual dysfunction (mean = 10.1; SD = 18.0) was highly prevalent. Greater sexual bother (lower scores) was related to younger age (β = 0.25, P = 0.03) and fewer months of ADT (β = 0.22, P = 0.05). Controlling for age, months of ADT, current and precancer sexual function, sexual bother correlated with more depressive symptoms (β = -0.24, P = 0.06) and lower QOL (β = 0.25, P = 0.05). Contrary to hypotheses, greater sexual bother was related to greater dyadic satisfaction (β = -0.35, P = 0.03) and cohesion (β = -0.42, P = 0.01).
The majority of APC patients undergoing ADT will experience sexual dysfunction, but there is variability in their degree of sexual bother. Psychosocial aspects of sexual functioning should be considered when evaluating men's adjustment to ADT effects. Assessment of sexual bother may help identify men at risk for more general distress and lowered QOL. Psychosocial interventions targeting sexual bother may complement medical treatments for sexual dysfunction and be clinically relevant, particularly for younger men and those first starting ADT.
接受雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT)的晚期前列腺癌(APC)男性患者常经历令人苦恼的性功能副作用。性困扰是适应过程的一个重要组成部分。与性困扰增加相关的因素尚未完全明确。
本研究旨在描述接受ADT的APC患者的性功能障碍和性困扰,确定与性困扰相关的社会人口学和健康/疾病相关特征,并评估性困扰与心理社会幸福感和生活质量(QOL)之间的关联。
使用一项更大规模心理社会干预研究的基线数据。采用Pearson相关性分析和独立样本t检验来检验双变量关系。多元回归分析评估性困扰与心理社会及生活质量结果之间的关系。
扩展前列腺癌指数综合问卷的性功能和性困扰子量表、流行病学研究中心抑郁量表、癌症治疗功能评估通用量表以及二元调适量表为主要结局指标。
参与者(N = 80)年龄为70岁(标准差[SD] = 9.6),接受ADT的时间为18.7个月(SD = 17.3)。性功能障碍(均值 = 10.1;SD = 18.0)非常普遍。性困扰程度越高(得分越低)与年龄越小(β = 0.25,P = 0.03)以及接受ADT的时间越短(β = 0.22,P = 0.05)相关。在控制年龄、接受ADT的时间、当前和癌前性功能后,性困扰与更多的抑郁症状(β = -0.24,P = 0.06)以及较低的生活质量(β = 0.25,P = 0.05)相关。与假设相反,性困扰程度越高与更高的二元满意度(β = -0.35,P = 0.03)和凝聚力(β = -0.42,P = 0.01)相关。
大多数接受ADT的APC患者会经历性功能障碍,但他们的性困扰程度存在差异。在评估男性对ADT影响的适应情况时,应考虑性功能的心理社会方面。对性困扰的评估可能有助于识别有更普遍困扰和生活质量降低风险的男性。针对性困扰的心理社会干预可能补充性功能障碍的医学治疗,并且在临床上具有相关性,特别是对于年轻男性和刚开始接受ADT的男性。