Frederick Luke R, Cakir Omer Onur, Arora Hans, Helfand Brian T, McVary Kevin T
Division of Urology, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL, USA.
J Sex Med. 2014 Oct;11(10):2546-53. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12647. Epub 2014 Jul 24.
Prior research conducted on treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) has been derived from surveys involving relatively small populations of men. There are needs for large population-based studies in this area. Our study addresses that need.
The aim of this study was to characterize ED treatment among a large population of men.
Patients ≥30 years in commercial insurance dataset with diagnosis code for ED during 12-month period ending June 2011 were identified. Men were considered "treated" if prescription was filled for phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE5i), injection or urethral prostaglandins, or androgen replacement (ART) during study period. "Untreated" patients received the diagnosis but did not fill prescription. Statistical analyses were used to compare prescription frequency with clinical characteristics, including age and comorbidities.
ED treatment rates among large population of insured men, treatment types employed, patient demographics, associated medical comorbidities of this population, and prescriber details were the main outcome measures.
Only 25.4% of 6,228,509 men with ED were treated during study period. While PDE5is were the most commonly prescribed medical therapy (75.2%), ART was utilized as monotherapy or in combination therapy in 30.6% of men. ART was significantly (P < 0.0001) more frequently used in men <40 and >65 years. Although ED frequency was associated with increased age and number of comorbidities, men >60 years were significantly (P < 0.0001) less likely to be treated compared with men aged 40-59 years. Additionally, treatment frequency did not vary as a function of number of comorbidities. However, compared with men with prostate cancer, men with comorbid hypogonadism, sleep disorders, benign prostatic hyperplasia, or components of metabolic syndrome were (P < 0.0001) more likely to be treated.
Despite high prevalence of ED with age and comorbidities, most men continue receiving no treatment. Although benefits of medical intervention for ED are well-recognized, many barriers to treatment continually exist including physician, patient and partner preference and knowledge.
此前关于勃起功能障碍(ED)治疗的研究来自涉及相对少量男性人群的调查。该领域需要开展基于大量人群的研究。我们的研究满足了这一需求。
本研究的目的是描述大量男性人群中的ED治疗情况。
在商业保险数据集中识别出年龄≥30岁、在截至2011年6月的12个月期间有ED诊断代码的患者。如果在研究期间为磷酸二酯酶5型抑制剂(PDE5i)、注射剂或尿道前列腺素或雄激素替代治疗(ART)开具了处方,则该男性被视为“接受治疗”。“未接受治疗”的患者虽有诊断但未开具处方。采用统计分析比较处方频率与临床特征,包括年龄和合并症。
大量参保男性中的ED治疗率、所采用的治疗类型、患者人口统计学特征、该人群的相关医学合并症以及开处方者的详细信息是主要观察指标。
在6228509名患有ED的男性中,研究期间仅有25.4%的人接受了治疗。虽然PDE5i是最常用的药物治疗(75.2%),但30.6%的男性将ART用作单一疗法或联合疗法。ART在年龄<40岁和>65岁的男性中使用频率显著更高(P<0.0001)。虽然ED的发生率与年龄增长和合并症数量增加相关,但与40 - 59岁的男性相比,60岁以上的男性接受治疗的可能性显著更低(P<0.0001)。此外,治疗频率并不随合并症数量而变化。然而,与患有前列腺癌的男性相比,患有合并性腺功能减退、睡眠障碍、良性前列腺增生或代谢综合征成分的男性接受治疗的可能性更大(P<0.0001)。
尽管随着年龄增长和合并症的出现,ED的患病率很高,但大多数男性仍未接受治疗。虽然ED的医学干预益处已得到充分认识,但治疗的许多障碍仍然存在,包括医生、患者及伴侣的偏好和认知。