Hulsegge Gerben, Smit Henriëtte A, van der Schouw Yvonne T, Daviglus Martha L, Verschuren W M Monique
Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2015 Oct;22(10):1307-16. doi: 10.1177/2047487314544083. Epub 2014 Jul 24.
Studies investigating the relation between risk profiles and cardiovascular disease have measured risk at baseline only. We investigated maintenance and changes of risk profiles over time and their potential impact on incident cardiovascular disease.
Population-based cohort study.
Risk factors were measured at baseline (1987-1991) among 5574 cardiovascular disease-free adults aged 20-59 years. They were classified into four risk categories according to smoking status, presence of diabetes and widely accepted cut-off values for blood pressure, total cholesterol/HDL-ratio and body mass index. Categories were subdivided (maintenance, deterioration, improvement) based on risk factor levels at six and 11 years of follow-up. Multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for cardiovascular disease incidence 5-10 years following the risk-change period were fitted using Cox proportional hazards models.
Only 12% of participants were low risk at baseline, and only 7% maintained it. Participants who maintained a low risk profile over 11 years had seven times lower risk of cardiovascular disease (HR: 0.14, 95% CI: 0.05-0.41) than participants with long-term high risk profile, whereas those low risk at baseline whose profile deteriorated had three times lower risk (HR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.18-0.71). Our results suggest that, within each baseline risk profile group, compared with a stable profile, improving profiles may be associated with up to two-fold lower HRs, and deteriorating profiles with about two-fold higher HRs.
Our study, using long-term risk profiles, demonstrates the full benefits of low risk profile. These findings underscore the importance of achieving and maintaining low risk from young adulthood onwards.
研究风险状况与心血管疾病之间关系的研究仅在基线时测量风险。我们调查了风险状况随时间的维持和变化及其对心血管疾病发病的潜在影响。
基于人群的队列研究。
在基线时(1987 - 1991年)对5574名年龄在20 - 59岁、无心血管疾病的成年人测量风险因素。根据吸烟状况、糖尿病的存在以及血压、总胆固醇/高密度脂蛋白比值和体重指数的广泛认可的临界值,将他们分为四个风险类别。根据随访6年和11年时的风险因素水平,将类别进一步细分(维持、恶化、改善)。使用Cox比例风险模型拟合风险变化期后5 - 10年心血管疾病发病率的多变量调整风险比(HRs)和95%置信区间(95% CIs)。
仅12%的参与者在基线时为低风险,且仅有7%维持该状态。在11年中维持低风险状况的参与者患心血管疾病的风险比长期处于高风险状况的参与者低7倍(HR:0.14,95% CI:0.05 - 0.41),而那些基线时为低风险但风险状况恶化的参与者风险低3倍(HR:0.36,95% CI:0.18 - 0.71)。我们的结果表明,在每个基线风险状况组内,与稳定的风险状况相比,风险状况改善可能与HRs降低多达两倍相关,而风险状况恶化则与HRs升高约两倍相关。
我们使用长期风险状况的研究证明了低风险状况的全部益处。这些发现强调了从青年期开始实现并维持低风险的重要性。