• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国终末期肾病患者中碳酸镧与盐酸司维拉姆的成本-最小化分析。

Cost-minimization analysis of lanthanum carbonate versus sevelamer hydrochloride in US patients with end-stage renal disease.

作者信息

Keith Michael S, Wilson Rosamund J, Preston Peter, Copley J Brian

机构信息

Shire, Wayne, Pennsylvania, USA.

Spica Consultants, Marlborough, Wiltshire, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2014 Sep 1;36(9):1276-86. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.06.036. Epub 2014 Jul 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.06.036
PMID:25069799
Abstract

PURPOSE

Sevelamer hydrochloride (SH) and lanthanum carbonate (LC) are calcium-free phosphate binders used in the clinical management of hyperphosphatemia in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The objective of this analysis was to assess the cost-effectiveness of LC monotherapy compared with SH monotherapy in US patients with ESRD in a clinical practice setting.

METHODS

This was a post hoc assessment of phosphate binder costs among US patients with ESRD who converted from SH to LC monotherapy in a previously published, 16-week, Phase IV, real-world study. Calculations of drug costs used both average wholesale price (AWP) and wholesale acquisition cost (WAC).

FINDINGS

There were 953 patients with available baseline SH dose data; 950 also had a recorded LC dose >0 mg at baseline, and 691 had dose data available for both SH at baseline and LC at week 16 (post hoc analysis population). Baseline demographic characteristics were similar in excluded patients and the post hoc analysis population. Mean (SD) serum phosphate levels were 5.91 (1.66) mg/dL at baseline and 5.93 (1.85) mg/dL after conversion to LC monotherapy for 16 weeks. Mean AWP costs were US$35.72 (16.89) per day at baseline and US$24.69 (8.28) per day at week 16, yielding an overall mean cost change (defined as LC cost - SH cost) of -US$11.03 (16.37) per day in favor of LC. The overall mean WAC cost change was -US$9.17 (13.64) per day. Within baseline SH dose subgroups 2400 to 4800, >4800 to 7200, >7200 to 9600, and >9600 mg/d, the mean AWP cost change ranged from US$2.78 (9.26) per day in favor of SH for the 2400- to 4800-mg/d subgroup to -US$33.15 (12.58) per day in favor of LC for the >9600-mg/d subgroup. Mean WAC cost changes showed a similar trend, ranging from US$2.33 (7.72) per day to -US$27.59 (10.48) per day. Linear regression analyses revealed that the inflection SH doses corresponding to a mean cost change of zero were 4905 mg/d (AWP) and 4908 mg/d (WAC). For the 455 (66%) patients in the post hoc analysis population who had baseline SH doses at least as high (≥ 5600 mg/d) as these point estimates, the mean SH:LC tablet ratio was ≥ 3.7, indicating a mean reduction in the tablet burden after conversion to LC of ≥ 73%.

IMPLICATIONS

This real-world assessment of comparative phosphate binder drug costs between SH and LC among US patients with ESRD indicates that average cost savings with LC use increased with increasing SH doses. Conversion to LC from SH ≥ 5600 mg/d reduced drug costs and tablet burden while maintaining serum phosphate levels.

摘要

目的

碳酸司维拉姆(SH)和碳酸镧(LC)是用于终末期肾病(ESRD)患者高磷血症临床管理的无钙磷结合剂。本分析的目的是在临床实践环境中评估LC单药治疗与SH单药治疗相比,对美国ESRD患者的成本效益。

方法

这是一项对美国ESRD患者中从SH转换为LC单药治疗的磷结合剂成本的事后评估,该数据来自之前发表的一项为期16周的IV期真实世界研究。药物成本计算使用了平均批发价(AWP)和批发采购成本(WAC)。

结果

有953例患者有可用的基线SH剂量数据;950例患者在基线时也记录了LC剂量>0mg,691例患者在基线时的SH剂量数据和第16周时的LC剂量数据均可用(事后分析人群)。排除患者和事后分析人群的基线人口统计学特征相似。基线时血清磷平均(标准差)水平为5.91(1.66)mg/dL,转换为LC单药治疗16周后为5.93(1.85)mg/dL。基线时平均AWP成本为每天35.72(16.89)美元,第16周时为每天24.69(8.28)美元,总体平均成本变化(定义为LC成本 - SH成本)为每天 - 11.03(16.37)美元,有利于LC。总体平均WAC成本变化为每天 - 9.17(13.64)美元。在基线SH剂量亚组2400至4800、>4800至7200、>7200至9600和>9600mg/d中,平均AWP成本变化范围从2400至4800mg/d亚组中有利于SH的每天2.78(9.26)美元到>9600mg/d亚组中有利于LC的每天 - 33.15(12.58)美元。平均WAC成本变化显示出类似趋势,范围从每天2.33(7.72)美元到每天 - 27.59(10.48)美元。线性回归分析显示,对应平均成本变化为零的拐点SH剂量分别为4905mg/d(AWP)和4908mg/d(WAC)。在事后分析人群中,455例(66%)基线SH剂量至少与这些点估计值一样高(≥5600mg/d)的患者中,平均SH:LC片剂比例≥3.7,表明转换为LC后片剂负担平均降低≥73%。

结论

这项对美国ESRD患者中SH和LC之间比较磷结合剂药物成本的真实世界评估表明,使用LC的平均成本节约随着SH剂量的增加而增加。从SH≥5600mg/d转换为LC可降低药物成本和片剂负担,同时维持血清磷水平。

相似文献

1
Cost-minimization analysis of lanthanum carbonate versus sevelamer hydrochloride in US patients with end-stage renal disease.美国终末期肾病患者中碳酸镧与盐酸司维拉姆的成本-最小化分析。
Clin Ther. 2014 Sep 1;36(9):1276-86. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.06.036. Epub 2014 Jul 26.
2
Real-world dose-relativity, tablet burden, and cost comparison of conversion between sevelamer hydrochloride/carbonate and lanthanum carbonate monotherapies.盐酸司维拉姆/碳酸司维拉姆与碳酸镧单一疗法转换的真实世界剂量相关性、片剂负担及成本比较
Clin Ther. 2014 Oct 1;36(10):1431-42.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.07.012. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
3
The real-world dose-relativity of sevelamer hydrochloride and lanthanum carbonate monotherapy in patients with end-stage renal disease.盐酸司维拉姆和碳酸镧单药治疗终末期肾病患者的真实世界剂量相关性
Adv Ther. 2013 Dec;30(12):1100-10. doi: 10.1007/s12325-013-0077-5. Epub 2013 Dec 5.
4
Cost-effectiveness of lanthanum carbonate in the treatment of hyperphosphatemia in dialysis patients: a Canadian payer perspective.碳酸镧治疗透析患者高磷血症的成本效果分析:一个加拿大支付方视角。
Clin Ther. 2012 Jul;34(7):1531-43. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.06.006. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
5
Cost-effectiveness of lanthanum carbonate versus sevelamer hydrochloride for the treatment of hyperphosphatemia in patients with end-stage renal disease: a US payer perspective.碳酸镧相对于盐酸司维拉姆治疗终末期肾病患者高磷血症的成本效果分析:美国支付者视角。
Value Health. 2011 Dec;14(8):1002-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.05.043. Epub 2011 Jul 28.
6
Phosphate-Binder Use in US Dialysis Patients: Prevalence, Costs, Evidence, and Policies.美国透析患者中磷结合剂的使用:流行率、成本、证据和政策。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2018 Feb;71(2):246-253. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.09.007. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
7
Cost-Effectiveness of First-Line Sevelamer and Lanthanum versus Calcium-Based Binders for Hyperphosphatemia of Chronic Kidney Disease.一线司维拉姆和碳酸镧与钙基结合剂治疗慢性肾脏病高磷血症的成本效益
Value Health. 2018 Mar;21(3):318-325. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.08.3020. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
8
Clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of lanthanum carbonate as second-line therapy in hemodialysis patients in Japan.日本血液透析患者中碳酸镧作为二线治疗的临床疗效和成本效益。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011 Jun;6(6):1375-84. doi: 10.2215/CJN.08841010. Epub 2011 May 5.
9
A systematic review of the economic evaluations of non-calcium-containing phosphate binders, sevelamer and Lanthanum, in end-stage renal disease patients with hyperphosphatemia.一项关于非钙类磷结合剂(司维拉姆和镧)在高磷血症终末期肾病患者中的经济性评价的系统评价。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2019 Jun;19(3):287-298. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2019.1567336. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
10
A meta-analysis of phosphate binders lanthanum carbonate versus sevelamer hydrochloride in patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing hemodialysis.终末期肾病血液透析患者中碳酸镧与盐酸司维拉姆两种磷结合剂的荟萃分析。
Afr Health Sci. 2018 Sep;18(3):689-696. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v18i3.27.

引用本文的文献

1
A network meta-analysis of therapies for hyperphosphatemia in CKD based on randomized trials.一项基于随机试验的慢性肾脏病高磷血症治疗的网络荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 15;15(1):2012. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-84942-8.
2
A Novel Method for Detecting Lanthanum Phosphate Deposition in the Gastroduodenal Mucosa Using Fluorescence Microscopy.一种使用荧光显微镜检测胃十二指肠黏膜中磷酸镧沉积的新方法。
Cureus. 2022 Oct 26;14(10):e30729. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30729. eCollection 2022 Oct.
3
A randomized controlled trial of different serum phosphate ranges in subjects on hemodialysis.
一项针对血液透析患者不同血清磷范围的随机对照试验。
BMC Nephrol. 2019 Feb 4;20(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12882-019-1216-2.
4
Vascular calcification: When should we interfere in chronic kidney disease patients and how?血管钙化:慢性肾脏病患者何时以及如何进行干预?
World J Nephrol. 2016 Sep 6;5(5):398-417. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v5.i5.398.
5
Sevelamer Carbonate and Lanthanum Usage Evaluation and Cost Considerations at a Veteran's Affairs Medical Center.退伍军人事务医疗中心的碳酸司维拉姆和镧使用评估及成本考量
Hosp Pharm. 2016 Apr;51(4):312-9. doi: 10.1310/hpj5104-312.
6
Incremental cost-utility of sevelamer relative to calcium carbonate for treatment of hyperphosphatemia among pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease patients.在透析前慢性肾病患者中,司维拉姆相对于碳酸钙治疗高磷血症的增量成本-效用。
BMC Nephrol. 2016 Apr 28;17(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12882-016-0256-0.
7
Economic comparison of the monitoring programmes for bluetongue vectors in Austria and Switzerland.奥地利和瑞士蓝舌病媒介监测计划的经济比较
Vet Rec. 2015 May 2;176(18):464. doi: 10.1136/vr.102979. Epub 2015 Apr 3.