Pedley Adam, Wade Alex R
Department of Psychology, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
F1000Res. 2013 Nov 15;2:247. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.2-247.v1. eCollection 2013.
A remarkable series of recent papers have shown that colour can influence performance in cognitive tasks. In particular, they suggest that viewing a participant number printed in red ink or other red ancillary stimulus elements improves performance in tasks requiring local processing and impedes performance in tasks requiring global processing whilst the reverse is true for the colour blue. The tasks in these experiments require high level cognitive processing such as analogy solving or remote association tests and the chromatic effect on local vs. global processing is presumed to involve widespread activation of the autonomic nervous system. If this is the case, we might expect to see similar effects on all local vs. global task comparisons. To test this hypothesis, we asked whether chromatic cues also influence performance in tasks involving low level visual feature integration.
Subjects performed either local (contrast detection) or global (form detection) tasks on achromatic dynamic Glass pattern stimuli. Coloured instructions, target frames and fixation points were used to attempt to bias performance to different task types. Based on previous literature, we hypothesised that red cues would improve performance in the (local) contrast detection task but would impede performance in the (global) form detection task.
A two-way, repeated measures, analysis of covariance (2×2 ANCOVA) with gender as a covariate, revealed no influence of colour on either task, F(1,29) = 0.289, p = 0.595, partial η (2) = 0.002. Additional analysis revealed no significant differences in only the first attempts of the tasks or in the improvement in performance between trials.
We conclude that motivational processes elicited by colour perception do not influence neuronal signal processing in the early visual system, in stark contrast to their putative effects on processing in higher areas.
近期一系列引人注目的论文表明,颜色会影响认知任务的表现。具体而言,这些论文指出,看到用红色墨水打印的参与者编号或其他红色辅助刺激元素,会提高需要局部处理的任务的表现,并阻碍需要全局处理的任务的表现,而蓝色则相反。这些实验中的任务需要高水平的认知处理,如类比求解或远距离联想测试,并且颜色对局部与全局处理的影响被认为涉及自主神经系统的广泛激活。如果是这样,我们可能会预期在所有局部与全局任务比较中看到类似的效果。为了验证这一假设,我们询问颜色线索是否也会影响涉及低水平视觉特征整合的任务的表现。
受试者对消色差动态格拉斯图案刺激执行局部(对比度检测)或全局(形状检测)任务。使用彩色指令、目标框架和注视点试图使表现偏向不同的任务类型。基于先前的文献,我们假设红色线索会提高(局部)对比度检测任务的表现,但会阻碍(全局)形状检测任务的表现。
以性别作为协变量的双向重复测量协方差分析(2×2 协方差分析)显示,颜色对任何一项任务均无影响,F(1,29) = 0.289,p = 0.595,偏 η² = 0.002。进一步分析显示,仅在任务的首次尝试中或各次试验之间的表现改善方面,均无显著差异。
我们得出结论,与颜色感知引发的动机过程对更高区域处理的假定影响形成鲜明对比的是,这些过程不会影响早期视觉系统中的神经元信号处理。