González M, Venter G J, López S, Iturrondobeitia J C, Goldarazena A
Entomology Laboratory, Basque Institute of Agricultural Research and Development, NEIKER-TECNALIA, Vitoria, Spain.
Med Vet Entomol. 2014 Dec;28(4):421-31. doi: 10.1111/mve.12081. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
The efficacy of 23 compounds in repelling Culicoides biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae), particularly Culicoides obsoletus (Meigen) females, was determined by means of a Y-tube olfactometer. The 10 most effective compounds were further evaluated in landing bioassays. The six most promising compounds (including chemical and plant-derived repellents) were evaluated at 10% and 25% concentrations in field assays using Centers for Disease Control (CDC) light traps. At least three compounds showed promising results against Culicoides biting midges with the methodologies used. Whereas olfactometer assays indicated DEET at 1 µg/µL to be the most effective repellent, filter paper landing bioassays showed plant-derived oils to be better. Light traps fitted with polyester mesh impregnated with a mixture of octanoic, decanoic and nonanoic fatty acids at 10% and 25% concentrations collected 2.2 and 3.6 times fewer midges than control traps and were as effective as DEET, which is presently considered the reference standard insect repellent. The best plant-derived product was lemon eucalyptus oil. Although these have been reported as safe potential repellents, the present results indicate DEET and the mixture of organic fatty acids to be superior and longer lasting.
通过Y型嗅觉仪测定了23种化合物对蠓科(双翅目:蠓科)叮咬蠓,特别是废弃库蠓(Meigen)雌蠓的驱避效果。对10种最有效的化合物进一步进行着陆生物测定评估。在现场试验中,使用疾病控制中心(CDC)诱蚊灯,以10%和25%的浓度对六种最有前景的化合物(包括化学和植物源驱避剂)进行了评估。使用所采用的方法,至少有三种化合物对叮咬蠓显示出有前景的结果。嗅觉仪试验表明,1 µg/µL的避蚊胺是最有效的驱避剂,而滤纸着陆生物测定表明植物源油效果更好。装有浸渍了10%和25%浓度的辛酸、癸酸和壬酸脂肪酸混合物的聚酯网的诱蚊灯收集到的蠓比对照诱蚊灯少2.2倍和3.6倍,并且与目前被视为参考标准驱虫剂的避蚊胺效果相同。最好的植物源产品是柠檬桉叶油。尽管这些已被报道为安全的潜在驱避剂,但目前的结果表明避蚊胺和有机脂肪酸混合物更优越且持续时间更长。