Wu Daxian, Liu Fei, Liu Hongbo, Dai Lizhong, Tan Deming
Department of Infectious Diseases, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Key Laboratory of Viral Hepatitis of Hunan Province, Changsha 410008, China.
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2014 Jul;39(7):664-72. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2014.07.003.
To observe the stability and sensitivity of transcription mediated amplification (TMA) system, and to compare it with real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in amplifying serum HCV RNA in HCV infected patients.
TMA system was established by moloney murine leukemia virus (MMLV) reverse transcriptase, T7 RNA polymerase and 2 specific primers firstly, and then its stability and repeatability were compared at different storage temperatures by the correlation change of HCV RNA amplification curve. The sensitivity difference between TMA and RT-PCR was evaluated by amplifying a group of 10-fold diluted HCV RNA samples which were transcribed in vitro. A total of 101 serums of chronic HCV infected patients were measured by TMA system and RT-PCR to observe the positive rate and their correlation. Linear correlation and linear regression were used to observe the correlation of the two methods.
TMA system was successfully established. TMA system was not stable when stored at 20 °C (placed for 24 hours only), but it was stable for 6 days when stored at 4°C or within 6 months when stored at -20 °C . Compared with RT-PCR whose reagent was made by Hunan Sansure Biotechology Corporation, TMA system showed 20 positive samples and 11 negative samples in a total of 31 samples. So was the RT-PCR kit of the Sansure Biotechology Corporation, and the concordance rate of the two methods was 100%. Advanced quantitative study of the 20 positive samples found that the two methods had good correlation and consistency (r=0.91, P<0.01). Compared with the results of RT-PCR whose reagent was made by Shanghai Kehua Bio-engineering Corporation, TMA system had 34 positive samples and 36 negative samples, while the RT-PCR technology had 32 positive samples and 38 negative samples out of 70 samples. The concordance rate of the two methods was 97.1%, with no statistical difference in the positive rate of the two methods (P>0.05). Advanced quantitative study of 29 positive samples found that the two methods had good correlation and consistency (r=0.96, P<0.01).
The stability and repeatability of TMA system are good within 6 months when stored at -20 °C storage temperature. Both TMA and RT-PCR HCV RNA can detect serum HCV RNA well, and the two methods have good correlation and consistency.
观察转录介导扩增(TMA)系统的稳定性和敏感性,并与实时逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染患者血清HCV RNA的结果进行比较。
首先用莫洛尼鼠白血病病毒(MMLV)逆转录酶、T7 RNA聚合酶和2条特异性引物建立TMA系统,然后通过HCV RNA扩增曲线的相关变化,比较其在不同储存温度下的稳定性和重复性。通过对一组体外转录的10倍稀释HCV RNA样本进行扩增,评估TMA与RT-PCR之间的敏感性差异。用TMA系统和RT-PCR检测101例慢性HCV感染患者的血清,观察阳性率及其相关性。采用直线相关和直线回归分析观察两种方法的相关性。
成功建立TMA系统。TMA系统在20℃储存(仅放置24小时)时不稳定,但在4℃储存6天稳定,在-20℃储存6个月内稳定。与湖南圣湘生物科技有限公司生产试剂的RT-PCR比较,在31份样本中,TMA系统显示20份阳性样本和11份阴性样本。圣湘生物科技有限公司的RT-PCR试剂盒检测结果相同,两种方法的符合率为100%。对20份阳性样本进行进一步定量研究发现,两种方法具有良好的相关性和一致性(r=0.91,P<0.01)。与上海科华生物工程股份有限公司生产试剂的RT-PCR结果比较,在70份样本中,TMA系统有34份阳性样本和36份阴性样本,而RT-PCR技术有32份阳性样本和38份阴性样本。两种方法的符合率为97.1%,两种方法的阳性率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。对29份阳性样本进行进一步定量研究发现,两种方法具有良好的相关性和一致性(r=0.96,P<0.01)。
TMA系统在-20℃储存温度下6个月内稳定性和重复性良好。TMA和RT-PCR均能较好地检测血清HCV RNA,两种方法具有良好的相关性和一致性。