Wang Xiaoming, Zhang Hui, Nie Liangming, Xu Linhai, Chen Min, Ding Zhaoping
Stem Cell Res Ther. 2014 Aug 1;5(4):92. doi: 10.1186/scrt481.
Adipose tissue-derived stromal cells (ADSCs) are abundant and easy to obtain, but the diversity of differentiation potential from different locations may vary with the developmental origin of their mesenchymal compartment. We therefore aim to compare the myogenic differentiation and reparative activity of ADSCs derived from the pericardial tissue to ADSCs of subcutaneous origin.
Pericardial and inguinal adipose tissues from Wistar rats were surgically obtained, and the stromal fraction was isolated after enzymatic digestion. The phenotypic epitopes of the resultant two types of ADSCs were analyzed with flow cytometry, and the expression of transcriptional factors was analyzed with immunostaining. Furthermore, their potential toward adipogenic, osteogenic, and myogenic differentiation also was compared. Finally, the reparative activity and the resultant functional benefits were examined by allograft transplantation into an infarcted model in rats.
ADSCs from two adipose sources showed identical morphology and growth curve at the initial stage, but inguinal ADSCs (ingADSCs) sustained significantly vigorous growth after 25 days of cultivation. Although both ADSCs shared similar immunophenotypes, the pericardial ADSCs (periADSC) intrinsically exhibited partial expression of transcription factors for cardiogenesis (such as GATA-4, Isl-1, Nkx 2.5, and MEF-2c) and more-efficient myogenic differentiation, but less competent for adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation. After in vivo transplantation, periADSCs exhibited significantly vigorous reparative activity evidenced by thickening of ventricular wall and pronounced vasculogenesis and myogenesis, although the majority of prelabeled cells disappeared 28 days after transplantation. The structural repair also translated into functional benefits of hearts after infarction.
Although two sources of ADSCs are phenotypically identical, pericADSCs constituted intrinsic properties toward myogenesis and vasculogenesis, and thus provided more potent reparative effects after transplantation; therefore, they represent an attractive candidate cell donor for cardiac therapy.
脂肪组织来源的基质细胞(ADSCs)数量丰富且易于获取,但不同部位的ADSCs分化潜能的多样性可能因其间充质成分的发育起源而异。因此,我们旨在比较心包组织来源的ADSCs与皮下来源的ADSCs的成肌分化和修复活性。
通过手术获取Wistar大鼠的心包和腹股沟脂肪组织,酶消化后分离出基质部分。用流式细胞术分析所得两种类型ADSCs的表型抗原决定簇,用免疫染色分析转录因子的表达。此外,还比较了它们向脂肪生成、成骨和成肌分化的潜能。最后,通过同种异体移植到大鼠梗死模型中,检测其修复活性及由此产生的功能益处。
两种脂肪来源的ADSCs在初始阶段形态和生长曲线相同,但腹股沟ADSCs(ingADSCs)在培养25天后生长明显旺盛。尽管两种ADSCs具有相似的免疫表型,但心包ADSCs(periADSCs)内在地表现出心脏发生转录因子(如GATA-4、Isl-1、Nkx 2.5和MEF-2c)的部分表达和成肌分化更高效,但脂肪生成和成骨分化能力较弱。体内移植后,periADSCs表现出明显旺盛的修复活性,表现为心室壁增厚以及明显的血管生成和成肌,尽管大多数预先标记的细胞在移植后28天消失。结构修复也转化为梗死后心脏功能的改善。
尽管两种来源的ADSCs在表型上相同,但periADSCs具有成肌和血管生成的内在特性,因此移植后提供更有效的修复作用;因此,它们是心脏治疗中极具吸引力的候选细胞供体。