BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Aug 1;14:213. doi: 10.1186/s12888-014-0213-z.
Suicide completion is a tragic outcome in secondary mental healthcare. However, the extent to which demographic and clinical characteristics, suicide method and service use-related factors vary across psychiatric diagnoses remains poorly understood, particularly regarding differences between 'schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD)' and 'all other diagnoses', which may have implications for suicide prevention in high risk groups.
308 patients who died by suicide over 2007-2011 were identified from the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust Biomedical Research Centre Case Register. Demographic, clinical, services use-related factors, 'full risk assessment' ratings and the Health of the Nation Outcome Scale (HONOS) scores were compared across psychiatric diagnoses. Specifically, differences between patients with and without SSD were investigated.
Patients with SSD ended their lives at a younger age, were more frequently of Black ethnicity and had higher levels of social deprivation than other diagnoses. Also, these patients were more likely to have HONOS and 'risk assessment' completed. However, patients who had no SSD scored significantly higher on 'self-injury' and 'depression' HONOS items and they were more likely to have the following 'risk assessment' items: 'suicidal ideation', 'hopelessness', 'feeling no control of life', 'impulsivity' and 'significant loss'. Of note, 'disengagement' was more common in patients with SSD, although they had been seen by the staff closer to the time of suicide than in all-other diagnoses. Whilst 'hanging' was the most common suicide method amongst patients with non-SSD, most service users with a SSD diagnosis used 'jumping' (from heights or in front of a vehicle).
Suicide completion characteristics varied between SSD and other diagnoses in patients receiving secondary mental healthcare. In particular, although clinicians tend to more frequently recognize suicide risk as a focus of concern in patients who have SSD, who are therefore more likely to have a detailed risk assessment documented; 'known' suicide risk factors appear to be more relevant in patients with non-SSD. Hence, the classic suicide prevention model might be of little use for SSD.
在二级精神卫生保健中,自杀完成是一个悲惨的结果。然而,在精神科诊断中,人口统计学和临床特征、自杀方法和服务使用相关因素的差异程度仍知之甚少,特别是在“精神分裂症谱系障碍(SSD)”和“所有其他诊断”之间的差异,这可能对高危人群的预防自杀有影响。
2007-2011 年间,从南伦敦和莫兹利国民保健信托基金会生物医学研究中心病例登记处确定了 308 名自杀死亡的患者。比较了人口统计学、临床、服务使用相关因素、“全面风险评估”评分和国家健康结果量表(HONOS)评分在不同精神科诊断中的差异。具体来说,研究了有和没有 SSD 的患者之间的差异。
SSD 患者的自杀年龄更小,更频繁地来自黑人种族,社会贫困程度更高。此外,这些患者更有可能完成 HONOS 和“风险评估”。然而,没有 SSD 的患者在 HONOS 的“自我伤害”和“抑郁”项目上得分显著更高,他们更有可能有以下“风险评估”项目:“自杀意念”、“绝望”、“感觉无法控制生活”、“冲动”和“重大损失”。值得注意的是,在 SSD 患者中,“脱离”更为常见,尽管他们在自杀前比所有其他诊断都更接近工作人员。虽然在非 SSD 患者中,“上吊”是最常见的自杀方法,但大多数有 SSD 诊断的服务使用者使用“跳楼”(从高处或在车辆前)。
在接受二级精神卫生保健的患者中,SSD 和其他诊断之间的自杀完成特征存在差异。特别是,尽管临床医生往往更频繁地将 SSD 患者的自杀风险视为关注的焦点,因此更有可能记录详细的风险评估;但在非 SSD 患者中,“已知”的自杀风险因素似乎更为相关。因此,经典的自杀预防模式对 SSD 可能没有什么用。