Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Jan;81(1):91-100. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.06.035. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has been developed to provide a less-invasive myotomy for achalasia in adults but seldom has been used in pediatric patients.
To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of POEM for pediatric patients with achalasia.
Single-center, prospective study.
Academic medical center.
A total of 27 pediatric patients (mean age 13.8 years, range 6-17 years) with achalasia.
The primary outcome was symptom relief during follow-up, defined as an Eckardt score of ≤3. Secondary outcomes were procedure-related adverse events, clinical reflux adverse events, and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure on manometry before and after POEM.
A total of 26 cases (96.3%) underwent successful POEM. A submucosal tunnelling attempt failed in 1 case because of serious inflammation and adhesion. No serious adverse events related to POEM were encountered. During a mean follow-up period of 24.6 months (range 15-38 months), treatment success was achieved in all patients (mean score before vs after treatment 8.3 vs 0.7; P < .001). Mean LES pressure also decreased from a mean of 31.6 mm Hg to 12.9 mm Hg after POEM (P < .001). Five patients developed clinical reflux adverse events (19.2%).
Single center and lack of some objective evaluations.
This relatively long-term follow-up study adds to the evidence that POEM seems to be a promising new treatment for pediatric patients with achalasia, resulting in long-term symptom relief in all cases and without serious adverse events.
经口内镜下肌切开术(POEM)已被开发用于为成人贲门失弛缓症提供一种微创肌切开术,但很少用于儿科患者。
评估 POEM 治疗小儿贲门失弛缓症的可行性、安全性和疗效。
单中心前瞻性研究。
学术医疗中心。
共 27 例贲门失弛缓症患儿(平均年龄 13.8 岁,范围 6-17 岁)。
POEM
主要结局是随访期间的症状缓解,定义为 Eckardt 评分≤3。次要结局是与 POEM 相关的不良事件、临床反流不良事件以及 POEM 前后食管下括约肌(LES)压力的测压。
共有 26 例(96.3%)成功进行了 POEM。1 例因严重炎症和粘连导致黏膜下隧道尝试失败。未发生与 POEM 相关的严重不良事件。在平均 24.6 个月(范围 15-38 个月)的随访期间,所有患者均达到治疗成功(治疗前平均评分 8.3 分 vs 治疗后 0.7 分;P<0.001)。LESP 压力也从 POEM 前的平均 31.6mmHg 降至 12.9mmHg(P<0.001)。5 例患者发生临床反流不良事件(19.2%)。
单中心和缺乏一些客观评估。
这项相对长期的随访研究进一步证明,POEM 似乎是治疗小儿贲门失弛缓症的一种有前途的新方法,所有患者均长期缓解症状,且无严重不良事件。