Suppr超能文献

术前与术后抗菌治疗对下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除术后后遗症影响的比较临床评估

A comparative clinical evaluation of the effect of preoperative and postoperative antimicrobial therapy on postoperative sequelae after impacted mandibular third molar extraction.

作者信息

Olurotimi Akanbi Olojede, Gbotolorun Olalekan Micah, Ibikunle Adebayo Aremu, Emeka Christian Ibezi, Arotiba Godwin Toyin, Akinwande Jelili Adisa

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Lagos Nigeria.

出版信息

J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2014 Jul 1;5(2):e2. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2014.5202. eCollection 2014 Apr.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effect of preoperative and postoperative antibiotics therapy on postoperative sequelae after impacted mandibular third molar extractions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a prospective study conducted at Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of the Lagos University Teaching Hospitalon consecutive patients with impacted third molar extractions for a 12 month period. Group I (n = 31) had administration of 1 gram of oral metronidazole and 1 gram of amoxicillin capsules 30 minutes preoperative and Group II (n = 31) had 500 milligrams of amoxicillin capsule 8 hourly and 400 milligrams of metronidazole tablets administered post operatively for 5 days. Pain, facial swelling and mouth opening assessment were done postoperatively and on days 1, 3 and 7.

RESULTS

The general pattern of postoperative pain, regardless of antimicrobial use revealed that pain increased from day 1 to day 3 postoperatively and began to decrease in intensity subsequently up to the seventh day. There was however a statistically significant difference (P = 0.0001) between the two groups on the 7th postoperative day with the subjects in Group I showing lower pain intensity. The mean difference of the facial width on days 1 and 3 was significant (P = 0.04 and P = 0.0001 respectively) with subjects in Group II having a reduced facial width compared to those in Group I.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggested that the administration of preoperative or postoperative antibiotics showed no marked differences in the degree of postoperative sequaele that occur after impacted mandibular third molar extractions.

摘要

目的

比较术前和术后抗生素治疗对下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除术后后遗症的影响。

材料与方法

这是一项前瞻性研究,在拉各斯大学教学医院口腔颌面外科对连续接受下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除术的患者进行了为期12个月的研究。第一组(n = 31)在术前30分钟口服1克甲硝唑和1克阿莫西林胶囊,第二组(n = 31)在术后每8小时口服500毫克阿莫西林胶囊,并口服400毫克甲硝唑片,持续5天。术后以及术后第1、3和7天进行疼痛、面部肿胀和开口度评估。

结果

无论是否使用抗菌药物,术后疼痛的总体模式显示,术后疼痛从第1天到第3天加重,随后强度开始降低,直至第7天。然而,术后第7天两组之间存在统计学显著差异(P = 0.0001),第一组患者的疼痛强度较低。第1天和第3天面部宽度的平均差异显著(分别为P = 0.04和P = 0.0001),与第一组相比,第二组患者的面部宽度减小。

结论

本研究表明,术前或术后使用抗生素在下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除术后发生的后遗症程度上没有显著差异。

相似文献

2
Effectiveness of Antimicrobial Therapy after Extraction of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018 Jan 1;19(1):81-85. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2215.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of gender and menstrual cycle phase on patıents undergoıng ımpacted thırd molar surgery: a cross-sectıonal study.
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2024 Jul 1;29(4):e468-e475. doi: 10.4317/medoral.26443.
2
A prospective split-mouth clinical study: comparison of piezosurgery and conventional rotary instruments in impacted third molar surgery.
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Mar;24(1):51-55. doi: 10.1007/s10006-019-00817-7. Epub 2019 Dec 7.
3
Dry Socket Etiology, Diagnosis, and Clinical Treatment Techniques.
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Apr;44(2):52-58. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2018.44.2.52. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
4
Infection, Alveolar Osteitis, and Adverse Effects Using Metronidazole in Healthy Patients Undergoing Third Molar Surgery: A Meta-analysis.
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2018 Jun;17(2):142-149. doi: 10.1007/s12663-017-1031-x. Epub 2017 Jul 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in third molar surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Oct;65(10):1909-21. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.03.004.
4
Postoperative analgesia after lower third molar surgery: contribution of the use of long-acting local anesthetics, low-power laser, and diclofenac.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006 Nov;102(5):e4-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.02.024. Epub 2006 Aug 10.
5
Postoperative prophylactic antibiotic treatment in third molar surgery--a necessity?
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004 Jan;62(1):3-8; discussion 9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2003.05.004.
6
Types, frequencies, and risk factors for complications after third molar extraction.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003 Dec;61(12):1379-89. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2003.04.001.
8
Third-molar removal patterns in an insured population.
J Am Dent Assoc. 2001 Apr;132(4):469-75. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2001.0209.
9
Celecoxib and rofecoxib. The role of COX-2 inhibitors in dental practice.
J Am Dent Assoc. 2001 Apr;132(4):451-6. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2001.0207.
10
Assessing health outcomes after extraction of third molars: the postoperative symptom severity (PoSSe) scale.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000 Oct;38(5):480-7. doi: 10.1054/bjom.2000.0339.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验