Niemeijer Maartje N, van den Berg Marten E, Eijgelsheim Mark, van Herpen Gerard, Stricker Bruno H, Kors Jan A, Rijnbeek Peter R
Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Medical Informatics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Heart. 2014 Dec;100(23):1831-6. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-305671. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a major health burden and is primarily caused by ventricular arrhythmias. Currently, the most well-known marker for the risk of ventricular arrhythmias is QT/QTc prolongation. Animal studies indicate that QT variability might be a better indicator. Our objective was to give an overview of the literature on QT variability in humans, therefore we performed a free-text search in PubMed and Embase from inception through February 2013. We identified nine QT variability markers in 109 studies reporting on QT variability markers, measured on the surface ECG. QT variability can be distinguished using two characteristics: heart rate normalisation and whether QT interval is measured on consecutive beats. Most study populations were small (median 48 subjects, range 1-805) and different methods, time intervals and leads for measurement were used. QT variability markers were determinants for the risk of ventricular arrhythmias, (sudden) cardiac death and total mortality. Few studies compared the predictive value of QT variability with that of QT/QTc prolongation. A study comparing all different QT variability markers is lacking. In conclusion, QT variability markers are potential determinants of ventricular arrhythmias and cardiac mortality. However, it is unclear which marker and methodology are clinically most useful as well as what reference values are reliable. More studies on larger datasets are needed to find the most accurate marker for the prediction of arrhythmias and SCD to assess its value in addition to QT/QTc duration and its role in drug-induced arrhythmia and sudden death.
心脏性猝死(SCD)是一项重大的健康负担,主要由室性心律失常引起。目前,最广为人知的室性心律失常风险标志物是QT/QTc延长。动物研究表明,QT变异性可能是一个更好的指标。我们的目的是对有关人类QT变异性的文献进行综述,因此我们在PubMed和Embase数据库中进行了从建库至2013年2月的自由文本检索。我们在109项报告表面心电图测量的QT变异性标志物的研究中确定了9种QT变异性标志物。QT变异性可根据两个特征进行区分:心率标准化以及QT间期是否在连续心搏上测量。大多数研究人群规模较小(中位数为48名受试者,范围为1 - 8o5),并且使用了不同的测量方法、时间间隔和导联。QT变异性标志物是室性心律失常、(心脏性)猝死和全因死亡率风险的决定因素。很少有研究比较QT变异性与QT/QTc延长的预测价值。缺乏一项比较所有不同QT变异性标志物的研究。总之,QT变异性标志物是室性心律失常和心脏性死亡率的潜在决定因素。然而,尚不清楚哪种标志物和方法在临床上最有用,以及哪些参考值是可靠的。需要更多关于更大数据集的研究,以找到预测心律失常和SCD的最准确标志物,除了评估QT/QTc时长之外,还要评估其在药物性心律失常和猝死中的价值及其作用。