Fukuda Hitoshi, Iwasaki Koichi, Murao Kenichi, Yamagata Sen, Lo Benjamin W Y, Macdonald R Loch
Department of Neurosurgery, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan.
Department of Neurosurgery, Himeji Medical Center, Himeji, Hyogo, Japan.
Surg Neurol Int. 2014 Jul 11;5:106. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.136701. eCollection 2014.
While clipping cerebral aneurysms at the neck is optimal, in some cases this is not possible and other strategies are necessary. The purpose of this study was to describe the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes for inability to clip reconstruct ruptured anterior communicating artery (ACoA) aneurysms.
Of the 70 cases of ruptured ACoA aneurysms between January 2006 and December 2013, our institutional experience revealed four cases of small ACoA aneurysms that had been considered clippable prior to operation but required trapping. When a unilateral A2 segment of anterior cerebral artery (ACA) was compromised by trapping, revascularization was performed by bypass surgery. Clinical presentation, angiographic characteristics, operative approach, intraoperative findings, and treatment outcomes were assessed.
Very small aneurysm under 3 mm was a risk factor for unexpected trapping. The reason for unexpected trapping was laceration of the aneurysmal neck in two cases, and lack of clippaple component due to disintegration of entire aneurysmal wall at the time of rupture in the others. Aneurysms with bilateral A1 were treated with sole trapping through pterional approach in two cases. The other two cases had hypoplastic unilateral A1 segment of ACA and were treated with combination of aneurysm trapping and revascularization of A2 segment of ACA through interhemispheric approach. No patients had new cerebral infarctions of cortical ACA territory from surgery. Cognitive dysfunction was observed in three cases, but all patients became independent at 12-month follow up.
Unexpected trapping was performed when ruptured ACoA aneurysms were unclippable. Trapping with or without bypass can result in reasonable outcomes, with acceptable risk of cognitive dysfunction.
虽然在动脉瘤颈部进行夹闭是治疗脑动脉瘤的最佳方法,但在某些情况下无法实现,需要采取其他策略。本研究的目的是描述无法夹闭并重建破裂的前交通动脉(ACoA)动脉瘤的发生率、危险因素及治疗结果。
2006年1月至2013年12月期间,在我们机构治疗的70例破裂ACoA动脉瘤病例中,有4例小型ACoA动脉瘤,术前认为可夹闭,但手术时需要采用包裹术。当大脑前动脉(ACA)的单侧A2段因包裹术而受到影响时,通过搭桥手术进行血管重建。评估临床表现、血管造影特征、手术入路、术中发现及治疗结果。
小于3mm的极小动脉瘤是意外包裹的危险因素。意外包裹的原因,2例是动脉瘤颈部撕裂,其他病例是由于破裂时整个动脉瘤壁崩解而缺乏可夹闭部分。2例双侧A1的动脉瘤通过翼点入路单纯包裹治疗。另外2例ACA单侧A1段发育不全,通过经半球间入路进行动脉瘤包裹并对ACA的A2段进行血管重建。没有患者因手术出现大脑前动脉皮质区域新的脑梗死。3例患者出现认知功能障碍,但所有患者在12个月随访时均恢复独立生活能力。
当破裂的ACoA动脉瘤无法夹闭时,需进行意外包裹。包裹术联合或不联合搭桥手术可取得合理的治疗结果,认知功能障碍风险可接受。